Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago

12-21-2012 , 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Note that Pratt is probably not a shill. He's a mark. His resume is pretty much exactly what'd you expect from someone Tsao respects:


He's also a big English-only guy and funds anti-abortion types. So, Tsao, that's your boyfriend. He's not remarkably worse than the usual scum you admire, but he's also not any better.
standard. he's wrong because of stuff completely unrelated to him being right.

makes sense!

also lol @ him being someone i admire, i'd never heard of him until i posted that video, and only remember his name because it's pratt and morgan is a pratt.


whatever he is, morgan (and all those who share his viewpoint) got thoroughly owned in that video and looked like an idiot.
12-21-2012 , 09:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sommerset
oooh ok, I actually had no idea what "its a dog whistle" meant So, this isnt true, then?
No, it's true. It happened. I don't know how often, because googling it reveals a lot of pages of white supremacists getting excited about how the Koreans got to shoot black people.

What dog whistle means is that mentioning it has a different meaning to different audiences.
12-21-2012 , 09:28 PM
[QUOTE=FlyWf;36313754

What dog whistle means is that mentioning it has a different meaning to different audiences.[/QUOTE]

Gotcha
12-21-2012 , 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
standard. he's wrong because of stuff completely unrelated to him being right.

makes sense!

also lol @ him being someone i admire, i'd never heard of him until i posted that video, and only remember his name because it's pratt and morgan is a pratt.


whatever he is, morgan (and all those who share his viewpoint) got thoroughly owned in that video and looked like an idiot.
also lol @ the fact that the spokesman for anti-gun arguments (Morgan) got completely owned on his own show by apparently someone whose dumb enough to be a racist.
12-21-2012 , 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
You want to bet about Biden confiscating our guns within a month? We can even bet in gold or silver if you don't want to use worthless fiat money.
the fact that your side will fail at banning guns doesn't change the fact that it wants to succeed.
12-21-2012 , 09:30 PM
Not confiscating guns is EXACTLY what a group of people who wanted to confiscate guns would do. God, Tsao, you should become a detective.
12-21-2012 , 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sommerset
Oh im not denying that the crazies will be crazy about this. But I mean, in a situation like that, where the police have been overpowered how else do these people protect their livelihoods? Again, I mean this sort of self defense seems pretty reasonable to me, and sure as hell goes a lot further with me than stuff like "I need my gun cuz constitution says"
Dunno about USA, but in Europe in case of a RIOT , the government compensates the financial loses to the victims.
12-21-2012 , 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Not confiscating guns is EXACTLY what a group of people who wanted to confiscate guns would do. God, Tsao, you should become a detective.
umm they aren't doing it by choice, if you missed that part?
12-21-2012 , 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
whatever he is, morgan (and all those who share his viewpoint) got thoroughly owned in that video and looked like an idiot.
so I guess you have to admit that ACism is confirmed the dumbest political philosophy ever given that lirva did nothing but get owned over and over again when he posted here? lol tsao
12-21-2012 , 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinner3
Dunno about USA, but in Europe in case of a RIOT , the government compensates the financial loses to the victims.
Europe seems pretty awesome
12-21-2012 , 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
so I guess you have to admit that ACism is confirmed the dumbest political philosophy ever given that lirva did nothing but get owned over and over again when he posted here? lol tsao
lirva isn't the spokesperson for ACism though...
12-21-2012 , 09:36 PM
but piers morgan is the spokesperson for...something?
12-21-2012 , 10:03 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/op...-out.html?_r=0

This has some interesting data, but unfortunately very little in the way of analysis as to what the op-ed author makes of it. I think it should make relatively clear that a higher number of guns doesn't necessarily translate to a higher rate of murder, even though the United States leads in both categories among high-income developed nations.
12-21-2012 , 10:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
but piers morgan is the spokesperson for...something?
he's the spokesperson for the anti-gun movement in america.

sorry but he represents the best your side has to offer :/
12-21-2012 , 10:11 PM
wow, you pick a cnn show host, and elevate him to spokesman for the cause. that is a special world you reside in and form opinions from
12-21-2012 , 10:11 PM
hahahaowow at claiming the dude on one side of the argument is a spokesperson for everyone on that side but the other guy isn't. Jesus Taso.
12-21-2012 , 10:14 PM
Carolyn McCarthy and Michael Bloomberg are spokespeople for those who support gun control. Piers Morgan is a clown with a TV show.
12-21-2012 , 10:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterwolves
Some smart gun talk. It looks like it's possible but pricey.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-...b_2324978.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by ligastar
the U.S. should make mandatory gun insurance (think car insurance) where gun owner's must have insurance on their weapon(s).

let's say $5 per month, per weapon. so a gun owner with a sporting rifle, a shotgun and a pistol would be looking at a $180 yearly gun insurance tab.

the gov't takes this money and uses it to (1) run the training courses / psycho test for new gun applicants, (2) expand the medical health capabilities in the U.S., and (3) buy back any guns now deemed illegal in the upcoming new legislation.

is this something NRA members and gun lovers could get behind? this gives the gun lovers a chance to be part of the solution instead of being part of the problem.
Still no response to either of these. And regarding the smart guns:

Quote:

The NRA has also insisted that smart gun technology would infringe upon the second amendment.
It's just ridiculous that the NRA's stance, or any gun nut's stance, is that the solution is more guns on the streets. I'm sure there are many responsible gun owners who carry, who train and practice shooting, and take great care to safeguard their weapons. But I think that these gun owners are in the minority of everyone who owns a gun. I have a feeling the majority of CCW holders have done the bare minimum requirements to get their permit.

For an armed populace to be effective, all permit holders would have to train regularly. Otherwise it would be like an army just handing out rifles, shooting a few practice rounds, and telling the soldiers to go take that hill.

I would think that the if the NRA was serious about responsible gun ownership, they would be at the forefront demanding tighter regulations on who was allowed to carry in public. Right now it just looks like they are lobbyists for the gun manufacturers.
12-21-2012 , 10:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
Carolyn McCarthy and Michael Bloomberg are spokespeople for those who support gun control. Piers Morgan is a clown with a TV show.
wat, you actually think those two are better spokespeople for your movement than Morgan?
12-21-2012 , 10:45 PM
****ing Obama is really pissing me off. Delegating to Biden, refusing to call out the NRA. Memo to Barry: you won twice. You don't have to run ever again. You can call these mother****ers out dude.
12-21-2012 , 10:47 PM
if he did his party would get romped by the NRA and its members.

nothing significant is going to happen with gun control riverman so what's your next solution to the problem?
12-21-2012 , 10:49 PM
Well, it's certainly good to see the gun nuts on the defensive.

/smug european
12-21-2012 , 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
if he did his party would get romped by the NRA and its members.

nothing significant is going to happen with gun control riverman so what's your next solution to the problem?
a. wrong. only gerrymandered republicans face consequences from the nra in the form of primary challenges, thanks to republitards rigging districts nationwide democratic seats arent decided by gun nuts.

b. lol taso.
12-21-2012 , 11:14 PM
I heard something about putting teachers in every gun store, are gun shows going to be extempt?
12-21-2012 , 11:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
****ing Obama is really pissing me off. Delegating to Biden, refusing to call out the NRA. Memo to Barry: you won twice. You don't have to run ever again. You can call these mother****ers out dude.
This. Why doesn't he? God knows what is being said behind closed doors in the White House. Political cost/benefit analysis bs.

      
m