Quote:
Originally Posted by waterwolves
Quote:
Originally Posted by ligastar
the U.S. should make mandatory gun insurance (think car insurance) where gun owner's must have insurance on their weapon(s).
let's say $5 per month, per weapon. so a gun owner with a sporting rifle, a shotgun and a pistol would be looking at a $180 yearly gun insurance tab.
the gov't takes this money and uses it to (1) run the training courses / psycho test for new gun applicants, (2) expand the medical health capabilities in the U.S., and (3) buy back any guns now deemed illegal in the upcoming new legislation.
is this something NRA members and gun lovers could get behind? this gives the gun lovers a chance to be part of the solution instead of being part of the problem.
Still no response to either of these. And regarding the smart guns:
Quote:
The NRA has also insisted that smart gun technology would infringe upon the second amendment.
It's just ridiculous that the NRA's stance, or any gun nut's stance, is that the solution is more guns on the streets. I'm sure there are many responsible gun owners who carry, who train and practice shooting, and take great care to safeguard their weapons. But I think that these gun owners are in the minority of everyone who owns a gun. I have a feeling the majority of CCW holders have done the bare minimum requirements to get their permit.
For an armed populace to be effective, all permit holders would have to train regularly. Otherwise it would be like an army just handing out rifles, shooting a few practice rounds, and telling the soldiers to go take that hill.
I would think that the if the NRA was serious about responsible gun ownership, they would be at the forefront demanding tighter regulations on who was allowed to carry in public. Right now it just looks like they are lobbyists for the gun manufacturers.