Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago

11-28-2012 , 10:53 AM
Don't worry, I'm sure you meant 'he works for and celebrates the party of slavery' and 'works fulltime on keeping the sharecroppers placated' in the best possible way.

11-28-2012 , 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
Don't worry, I'm sure you meant 'he works for and celebrates the party of slavery' and 'works fulltime on keeping the sharecroppers placated' in the best possible way.

your a good person, one of these days you will see the error of your ways.
11-28-2012 , 11:46 AM
Any day now I'll stop celebrating slavery and appeasing those damn sharecroppers, you'll see!
11-28-2012 , 12:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by will1530
In Washington it is a multiple guess exam (leaf through a booklet for a bit and you'll pass), and drive a few miles with the instructor. If you manage to always use your turn signals, stay in the correct lane, and parallel park you've passed (about equivalent to putting a few rounds down range and hitting somewhere on the target board).
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
This is essentially everywhere.
and yet many people fail the test and have to retake it multiple times. There are many people who, without significant practice and study, cannot pass these tests. I certainly feel a little safer knowing that the drivers on the road have passed at least this basic test of competence.
11-28-2012 , 12:35 PM
oh man this thread

11-28-2012 , 01:04 PM
My visual encapsulation of this thread:

11-28-2012 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrunchyBlack
oh man this thread

gif dance party, y'all!

11-28-2012 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
gif dance party, y'all!

For the record, the red head from Doctor Who can do no wrong. Anyone who gifs her in a snarky way will have bad karma.

11-28-2012 , 02:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kurto
For the record, the red head from Doctor Who can do no wrong. Anyone who gifs her in a snarky way will have bad karma.

+1
11-28-2012 , 03:02 PM
had to do it.
11-29-2012 , 05:48 AM
Oh man. I just remembered an argument DBJ and I got into where his position was people are as exposed to guns as they are to cars (it was an extension of the popular slippery slope argument that if we make guns illegal the next thing you know cars, balloons, pianos, joy, will also be illegal - one of my favorites).

Am I remembering that right?
11-29-2012 , 06:18 AM
Yea, you did a pretty ****ing epic faceplant trying to disprove that, finally just appealing to your own authority and throwing your hands up.

It was a good argument while it lasted though.
11-29-2012 , 06:37 AM
Wait. DBL was saying the average person has the same exposure to guns as cars?
11-29-2012 , 07:09 AM
No. Although his statement was intentionally written to midlead the reader into believing that.
11-29-2012 , 12:05 PM
I'm probably just wrong but that's exactly what I remember you arguing.
11-29-2012 , 03:43 PM
I would like to quickly pop in to hopefully add some fuel to the fire:

For first time in recent history, NYC goes 1 day without any violent crime
11-29-2012 , 03:50 PM
FWIW - Alan Korwin responds: http://www.ammoland.com/2012/11/29/a...#axzz2DduaWZNf

Quote:
‘Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out’

“Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you own. Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It has happened in the UK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did.

Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the citizens.”
PHOENIX, AZ --(Ammoland.com)- Where did that email / article come from? A lot of people apparently got it before someone sent me a copy.

I’d like to write to whoever decided to create and circulate it.

I finally got it in this link from someone: http://americannationalmilitia.com/o...an-list-is-out

I did not write that inflammatory paragraph and its next sentence, even though someone has attributed that to me.

HOWEVER:
I did indeed post, in January 2009, the huge list of guns to be banned that came with it — which I took directly from a Democrat’s proposed bill, HR 1022, in the 110th Congress. That list is accurate (as it appeared in the link above, and as it remains posted on my website), including the blanket powers to be granted to the Attorney General, amounting to an extraordinarily broad firearms ban.

["Rifles (or copies or duplicates): M1 Carbine, Sturm Ruger Mini-14, AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15, AR-10, Thompson 1927, Thompson M1; AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM, MAK90, NHM 90, NHM 91..."the list goes on at great length, including shotguns, handguns, gear, parts and much more, go to my website for the whole list]

That part is not invented. It was from Congress. In 2009. To everyone who wrote to me asking for the source, there it is.

No one, including the Democrats, expected that to have a chance of passage at that time,
under President Bush. It simply showed what they wished for, and they introduced it into Congress.

It is horrifying from a gun-rights perspective.
Whoever used my name without my permission or knowledge was at least clever.

My original posting is here, including the list of guns to be banned, and you can read it: www.gunlaws.com/GunLawUpdate3.htm.

If you own a gun, chances are yours is included, because along with the specific lists,
are features guns have, like grips (you read that right), and anything the AG might decide to add.

The Brady Gun-Ban Strategy, issued at the same time at the beginning of Obama’s first term, is here: www.gunlaws.com/BradyStrategy2009.htm

It did not circulate very far outside their own circles. The lamestream media basically ignored it because it was so incendiary.

This is why the left was so disappointed with Obama’s performance: he failed to act on their astounding rights-removal plans.

Their respect for the fundamental civil and human right to arms is lower than you can dream. Now, as far as I’m aware, no one outside his inner circle has seen his current plans.

Saying “Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out” — and attributing that to me, is false. I would sure like to know who did that. But the list of guns was real, it was proposed in Congress almost four years ago.

Who knows what they’re planning now. Wait and see. I doubt it will be good, if your rights mean anything.

As before, I’ll be watching, and will continue to post these things as I find them.

I read the bills, and describe them in plain English. I get other insider info. It’s what I do. Get on my list on my home page — http://www.gunlaws.com

I have the UN Arms Trade Treaty spelled out in my reports 113, 114 and 116, here: http://www.gunlaws.com/PageNineIndex.htm

113- How treaties can trump the Constitution; 114- The UN treaty spelled out in plain English;
116- Mexico’s plan to use it against us, from our pro-rights Ambassador Donald Mahley.

Get on my list on my home page — http://www.gunlaws.com

Permission to circulate this memo gladly granted.

Alan Korwin.

P.S. If that doesn’t worry you enough, scroll down to this item on my New Stuff page: GUN-RIGHTS LICENSING PLANNED, http://www.gunlaws.com/newstuff.htm also introduced into Congress, HR 45, at about the same time, the beginning of Obama’s term.

It would require a test to own a gun that no one could pass, plus biometric ID that doesn’t exist. It also had no chance of passage, but shows how they were thinking. It got no co-sponsors, was introduced by former Black Panther Bobby Rush, and what’s our Congress come to.
Huge stretch to imagine Alan Korwin could have ever written the content in the OP. Also gunlaws.com seems pretty legit imo:

11-29-2012 , 04:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I would like to quickly pop in to hopefully add some fuel to the fire:

For first time in recent history, NYC goes 1 day without any violent crime
24 hours without violence in a "Gun Free Zone".

Hell yes. You work it girl!
11-29-2012 , 06:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I would like to quickly pop in to hopefully add some fuel to the fire:

For first time in recent history, NYC goes 1 day without any violent crime



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xH_6_8NOfwI

juking the stats?

Last edited by riverdance; 11-29-2012 at 06:39 PM. Reason: disregard teh polish subtitles
11-30-2012 , 01:12 PM
AFTER YOU SHOOT
11-30-2012 , 01:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrunchyBlack
AFTER YOU SHOOT
The gun's hot the perp's not. I just can't imagine shooting someone dead and then sitting down to some light reading.
11-30-2012 , 02:32 PM
i thought that book title was a suggestion that you should only shoot ugly people

11-30-2012 , 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
If guns ever were taken away, there would be some portion of the population agitating for open carry bow and arrow.
Meanwhile, in Wyoming...

Quote:
Three people were reportedly killed during an attack at a community college in Wyoming.

Casper Police Chief Chris Walsh told the Star Tribune two people were found dead at the school's Wold Physical Science Center and another was found at another location in Casper.

Walsh said no suspects were at large and no additional injuries were reported.

Earlier, Casper College spokesman Rich Fujita said the incident, according to unconfirmed initial reports, involved a faculty member and a student. The attack involved a crossbow or another similar weapon, Fujita said.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/30...unity-college/
11-30-2012 , 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
This is a godafwul, but at least logically consistent, position. I guess I'm directing the argument to people who are OK with drivers license tests but seem to think that a similar thing for guns is a slippery slope to a Stalinist dictatorship.
you need a license to drive a car on a public road, not own it
11-30-2012 , 11:40 PM
so you need a license to have a gun in public? not own it?

      
m