Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago

11-27-2012 , 04:54 PM
there's a report post function for that
11-27-2012 , 05:02 PM
I'm on my phone
11-27-2012 , 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
of course you do, people from the south are racist murderous scum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Case Closed
See, now you get it. I don't think they're especially murderous, but certainly racist and in love with the right to bear toys.
LOLbigotaments
11-27-2012 , 05:03 PM
I once reported a post.

The offending party received a temp ban.

Was impressed.
11-27-2012 , 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
I didn't actually own a gun at the time!

XD
rentals damnit. I am super pissed I didn't get another lefty pinko on my training resume.
11-27-2012 , 05:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
I once reported a post.

The offending party received a temp ban.

Was impressed.
I have done it ITT and others... nothing happend because I am from the south so clearly i'm a murderous racist.
11-27-2012 , 05:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
Grunching


Can a mod remove the extra comma from the thread title??
Hell, no.
11-27-2012 , 05:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by prana
So we're to the point where you guys are arguing that shooting is justified because you just don't know if they will listen when you point the gun at their head and say freeze? LOL. This is my issue with guns. The ******ed ass owners. I'm scared to hunt with idiots after reading this type of ****.

Give them a chance to comply and if they don't shoot. You already have the gun pointed directly at them ffs.
Guns dont kill people, people who own guns who come up with ******ed justifications to kill people kill people.

The problem is when these people call themselves the intelligent responsible gun owners like Neblis and DBJ and I actually believe them as being on the right of the bell curve.
11-27-2012 , 05:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
Grunching


Can a mod remove the extra comma from the thread title??
I tried to capture the cadence of the statement as uttered by Mr. Heston.
11-27-2012 , 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
Grunching


Can a mod remove the extra comma from the thread title??
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]
The problem is when these people call themselves the intelligent responsible gun owners like Neblis and DBJ and I actually believe them as being on the right of the bell curve.
could a mod please move the extra comma from the thread title into this sentence so I can understand it better?
11-27-2012 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by '[Phill
;35938881]The problem is when these people call themselves the intelligent responsible gun owners like Neblis and DBJ and I actually believe them as being on the right of the bell curve.
11-27-2012 , 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]
Guns dont kill people, people who own guns who come up with ******ed justifications to kill people kill people.
+1

Quote:
The problem is when these people call themselves the intelligent responsible gun owners like Neblis and DBJ and I actually believe them as being on the right of the bell curve.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
could a mod please move the extra comma from the thread title into this sentence so I can understand it better?
+1

I think its a backhanded complement, but what do I know i'm just a murderous hayseed.
11-27-2012 , 06:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
I think its a backhanded complement, but what do I know i'm just a murderous hayseed.
I thought about reporting it but I'm not 100% sure it's a personal attack.

Honestly I'm only assuming he's disagreeing with me because of what I know to be his general feelings on guns.
11-27-2012 , 06:38 PM
Well Neblis is openly talking about murdering people who enforce gun bans and you are obsessed with talking about how unarmed people "arent really unarmed, cos they might still be armed" which effectively makes every marginal case and many besides into justified kills.

It wasnt a compliment. You could call it an attack I guess, I would just call it an accurate summing up of your positions within this thread.
11-27-2012 , 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
Honestly I'm only assuming he's disagreeing with me because of what I know to be his general feelings on guns.
I think hes saying that you and I are the good guys but that we are scawwwy so therefore the other guys are mega scawwwy.
11-27-2012 , 06:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
What I can't get behind is forcing some poor schmuck who wants to get into skeet shooting to pay $1k for a class worth $150 due to a government monopoly artificially increasing the demand and controlling who can instruct the course for the "greater good" of making sure poor people are disarmed.
Meh, contract out the training and let the economy of scale do its thing, provide subsidized training for the poor. ez game.
11-27-2012 , 06:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]
you are obsessed with talking about how unarmed people "arent really unarmed, cos they might still be armed" which effectively makes every marginal case and many besides into justified kills.
Damn gun nuts with their facts and knowledge wrecking our lynch mobs AMIRITE?
11-27-2012 , 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]
Well Neblis is openly talking about murdering people who enforce gun bans
To clarify, I said it wasn't gonna happen but if it did by some fluke it would end in blood. And it not murder to protect your natural rights from armed violators.


Quote:
and you are obsessed with talking about how unarmed people "arent really unarmed, cos they might still be armed" which effectively makes every marginal case and many besides into justified kills.
again Phil what are you supposed to do to an intruder? Fix him a cup o tea?

If someone is in your home and persists in coming after you... your getting ass raped at minimum.

Quote:
It wasnt a compliment. You could call it an attack I guess,
Yeah I guess I don't speak chav as well as I thought.
11-27-2012 , 06:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Meh, contract out the training and let the economy of scale do its thing, provide subsidized training for the poor. ez game.
See, in reality if this were actually the way this went down, it wouldn't catch so much resistance.

It'd still get some, but the way NeBlis put it is reality.

A specific course is required. Individuals who meet X criteria can apply for certification to teach the course.

The imbalance between students vs instructors causes waiting lists and price increases. To maintain this, instructors lobby to create more and more difficult barriers to become certified.

End result, few people making under $75k can afford to get a carry permit.*

*Which is, of course the point of this "Mandatory training" talking point.
11-27-2012 , 06:53 PM
Quote:
again Phil what are you supposed to do to an intruder?
The minimum amount of violence required to end the situation safely. Obviously.

Quote:
To clarify, I said it wasn't gonna happen but if it did by some fluke it would end in blood. And it not murder to protect your natural rights from armed violators.
You would kill a cop, or two, and they would kill you and your family. If you are lucky you might live in a place with a weird name so someone will remember it like Waco or Ruby Ridge and you could get a wiki page if it is famous enough.
11-27-2012 , 06:54 PM
Somehow we manage to have mandatory basic safety testing for auto licenses. No reason we can't do the same for guns.
11-27-2012 , 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
See, in reality if this were actually the way this went down, it wouldn't catch so much resistance.

It'd still get some, but the way NeBlis put it is reality.

A specific course is required. Individuals who meet X criteria can apply for certification to teach the course.

The imbalance between students vs instructors causes waiting lists and price increases. To maintain this, instructors lobby to create more and more difficult barriers to become certified.

End result, few people making under $75k can afford to get a carry permit.*

*Which is, of course the point of this "Mandatory training" talking point.
This explains why most people in America dont have a drivers license. I always wondered why that was, and now I see, the government controlled monopoly licensing for the operation of motor vehicles priced most people out of the market.
11-27-2012 , 06:55 PM
See, if you leave out
Quote:
Which is, of course the point of this "Mandatory training" talking point.
I think you get a lot more people to take your post seriously and realize its pretty accurate
11-27-2012 , 06:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Somehow we manage to have mandatory basic safety testing for auto licenses. No reason we can't do the same for guns.
Goram it, my pony license is government operated and thus slower.
11-27-2012 , 06:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Somehow we manage to have mandatory basic safety testing for auto licenses. No reason we can't do the same for guns.
"You people" don't have a good track record when it comes to these issues, unfortunately.

      
m