Couldn't help myself from trying to unpack this
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockymtnchief View Post
AR-15's have been around way before schools shooters came along. It's not the problem.
Well if rockymtnchief says it's not the problem...Even way before Charles Whitman came along?
Quote:
As has been said before, it wouldn't be my choice for a close quarters shooting.
Well if it wouldn't be his choice for close quarter killing then...huh? Does his opinion carry extra weight on this subject? (And why does he say "shooting", as if this is a situation requiring professionalism or some ****?)
Quote:
These dumbasses are just copy-cat dip****s. Soft target (check), scary looking gun (check), get famous (check), try to beat the last shooters body count (check), die by suicide/**** my pants when confronted (check).
These observations may be fairly accurate, but why "just"? If they're just copy-cat dip****s then...what? The murders aren't as important, or impressive, or something, if the murderer isn't smart? Do the victims of a dip**** not count as much as the victims of a criminal mastermind?
Quote:
I remember in the 80's and 90's when Tec-9's, Uzi and Mac-10's were the firearm that scared the lefties. They're still around. Why aren't they scary anymore?
I'm trying to imagine I'm this moron and I don't get his point wrt Uzis and Mac-10's. They're (apparently) still around, and they're (apparently) no longer scary, therefore...what? In time AR-15 hysteria will pass and life will be good?
Last edited by Oroku$aki; 02-18-2018 at 01:11 PM.