Connecticut Supreme Court rules that Remington can be sued by Sandy Hook victims for manufacturing the gun used to kill their children
There's a federal law (lol USA, wow) that specifically protects gun manufacturers from this liability, but Connecticut ruled that in this instance, because of how Remington markets the gun as a killing machine to civilians, they can be liable:
Quote:
The court’s decision was narrow, with the liability for gunmakers based on how they advertise their weapons rather than on the sale of them to third parties who then commit horrible crimes. In its ruling, the court said companies that market military-style guns to civilians as a way of killing enemies could be violating state fair trade laws.
“The regulation of advertising that threatens the public’s health, safety, and morals has long been considered a core exercise of the states’ police powers,” the court said, explaining why the federal law does not apply.
Quote:
The families alleged, for example, that the Bushmaster product catalogue shows soldiers on patrol in jungles along with the phrase: “When you need to perform under pressure, Bushmaster delivers,” and promotes the rifle to civilians as “the ultimate combat weapons system.”
Quote:
The Connecticut court said the suit, which seeks unspecified damages for each death, could go forward under that state’s Unfair Trade Practices Act, a statute aimed at harmful marketing, in this case marketing not of the weapon but rather its use as a potential tool for “offensive military style combat” by civilians, which is illegal.