Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Morons yelling at other morons about pit bulls Morons yelling at other morons about pit bulls

01-27-2018 , 09:16 PM
+rep_lol,


Oh man, I was not playing when I said,

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
Aw hell naw +rep done up and done it.

...
Johnny and I could discuss until our fingers fell off but the moment a cute pitbull was posted I knew lawnmowers would hit the stratosphere.
01-27-2018 , 11:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
Pit bull garbage extracted
Quote:
Morons yelling at other morons about pit bulls
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
Here, now you sh¡theads can yell at each other in peace. Enjoy.

PS idgaf what you do here, don’t waste our time reporting posts, just have your goddamn dog thread and keep it out of literally anywhere else.

heh

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...0&postcount=64

Quote:
...

And I was modded to deal with personal attacks, so...
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...&postcount=321

Quote:
Not super hard to infract someone for calling someone else an idiot just because you’re posting in the thread imo.

lol
01-27-2018 , 11:14 PM
God's honest truth LK I find that endearing but I guess the lesson going forward is the next time you infract/ban somebody for calling somebody else a moronic garbage ****head maybe just reflect on the twinge of empathy you'll hopefully feel.
01-28-2018 , 01:33 AM
01-28-2018 , 02:37 AM
LK also moved those last two posts, weird.

Honestly I had no idea the topic was such a flashpoint.

It's like this clip,





only because this is a politics forum 'pitbulls' replaces 'voting' and 'voting' replaces '****ing my wife in the ass'.
01-28-2018 , 02:48 AM
01-28-2018 , 04:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
people who are shook by pit bulls are real special snowflakes
Dog owners are the lowest tier of human society, people too lonely to have friends and partners, who need to supplement their inadecuacies with an animal that worships them, and pitbull owners are the bottom feeders of this social strata, people who need to feel bigger by appearing next to an animal that causes fear, whether warranted or not.

If you aren't selling drugs or averse to using banks or something similar, you really have no excuse for owning pitbulls or rottweilers. These are ugly dogs. They're like dog SUVs.
01-28-2018 , 05:42 AM
Holy ****ing **** where is the ****ing unsubscribe button.
01-28-2018 , 05:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by estefaniocurry
Dog owners are the lowest tier of human society, people too lonely to have friends and partners, who need to supplement their inadecuacies with an animal that worships them, and pitbull owners are the bottom feeders of this social strata, people who need to feel bigger by appearing next to an animal that causes fear, whether warranted or not.

If you aren't selling drugs or averse to using banks or something similar, you really have no excuse for owning pitbulls or rottweilers. These are ugly dogs. They're like dog SUVs.
Some of us have friends, partners and dogs you booger eating mouth breather.
01-28-2018 , 06:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
Holy ****ing **** where is the ****ing unsubscribe button.
Really? This is like a mini Unchained and a perfect springboard for you to drop some more hot-ass, sweet-ass Scientific Racism takes.
01-28-2018 , 06:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hired Goons2
Some of us have friends, partners and dogs you booger eating mouth breather.
Relax, I'm pretty sure he's trolling. The rottweiler mention was one tell of a few..
01-28-2018 , 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorio
Hm, let's see when your favorite Breitbart Dogsbiteorg/Meritt Clifton Black Pitbull Crime Blog makes an appearance.

Quote:
The social media universe became furious at KFC this week after an employee reportedly asked a 3-year-old victim of a dog attack to leave one of their restaurants because “her face is disrupting our customers.”

But it wasn’t KFC employees who broke down the door to Victoria Wilcher’s grandfather’s house and mauled the toddler until half her face was paralyzed and she lost the use of one of her eyes. Three pit bulls did that.

Pit bulls make up only 6% of the dog population, but they’re responsible for 68% of dog attacks and 52% of dog-related deaths since 1982, according to research compiled by Merritt Clifton, editor of Animals 24-7, an animal-news organization that focuses on humane work and animal-cruelty prevention.
Oh OK, 3rd paragraph, later than I expected.


p.s. Like, gregorio, how do you do zero due diligence? This dude http://btoellner.typepad.com/kcdogbl...t-clifton.html has a good translation of this http://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/...-anti-pitbulls but he also, probably not coincidentally, says almost verbatim what I was about to type:

Quote:
The two sides of the 'pit bull debate' in the United States are pretty lopsided. On the side of breed-specific legislation is bad policy, you have quite literally the entirety of every organization of professionals in the country -- including the largest collection of veterinarians in the country (AVMA), the largest collection of animal control officers (NACA), the Center for Disease Control, the American Bar Association, and all of the large animal welfare and professional dog training groups.

On the side in favor of breed specific legislation, you quite literally have Merritt Clifton, and dogsbite.org, neither of which deserves to be given anywhere near the credibility of the professional and government organizations that they oppose.
We can leave the pitbulls at the door; this is about basic, general processing of information. You can tell the other OOT dudes to come lurk and I can do a 6ix's Remedial Critical Thinking And Reading Class.
01-28-2018 , 06:56 AM
lol 5 stars

you morans
01-28-2018 , 07:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
Relax, I'm pretty sure he's trolling. The rottweiler mention was one tell of a few..
No ****, dumbass.
01-28-2018 , 07:13 AM
we all have our inadecuacies
01-28-2018 , 12:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigt2k4


I think Polar Bears should allowed to be pets
That polar bear ate the dog later. Or would have. It was just playing with its food.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.1cf322b7e340
01-28-2018 , 02:45 PM
How about a nice, chill bull?

01-28-2018 , 03:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
That polar bear ate the dog later. Or would have. It was just playing with its food.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.1cf322b7e340
Pretty sure that was a different polar bear. I watched a documentary on how it started, and how one polar bear came year after year to play with the dogs and then brought another to play with the dogs. I'm sure the other polar that ate the dog came not to play with the dogs, but in search of food. Some guy said that animals can interpret play signals and dogs started giving off play signals to the original polar bear who decided it would rather play and make friends.
01-28-2018 , 03:59 PM
Nice to see PU isn't totally dead...
01-28-2018 , 05:38 PM
Not surprised to see who the pitbull haters ITT are. I have 2 and nobody who has met them would argue for a ban. One of them can be a bit defensive if he's out on a walk and someone approaches the wrong way but I just keep him away from other people cause I have some sense. The other one is the most friendly dog you'll ever meet, he won't even tear up his chew toys. But you guys would have them put to sleep cause they were bred to be fighting dogs or whatever. JLawOK.gif
01-28-2018 , 05:41 PM
I'm not a hater btw (though certainly not a pitbull lover), and almost no one wants all pits put to sleep. The OOT thread is about breeding them or not, not about killing all of them.

Is it surprising who the pitbull owners are?
01-28-2018 , 06:06 PM
LOL D10 completely missing the point. Humans >>> your dog, so there is no "wrong" way to approach it in public. The fact that the dog might react poorly if approached "incorrectly" is the entire reason they should be banned. I shouldn't have to worry about how I'm coming at every random ******* walking a dog down the street.
01-28-2018 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Truant
They are uniquely dangerous because of the damage they can inflict with their attack style which is grab and shake, their high pain threshold which makes it hard to get them to stop, their strength and their general game that was bred into them by humans purposefully. Other dogs are "more aggressive" in terms of frequency of bites, but many of them bite once and that's it or else can't physically do the same level of damage, so they are still less dangerous. It's not that complex. If it were not true then why would they be chosen for dog fighting? Also, how the **** could any pit bull lover say they are the most special, loyal, loving cuddle bugs if then say there is not a difference between them and any other breed? Of course there is a difference in breeds.

I understand that there is a complexity with determining what constitutes a pit bull vs a mix vs another breed with a big head and neck or whatever. I understand that anything that looks like a pit is called a pit often times leading to incorrect identification. I agree that pits get sensationalized in the news. I understand that pit bull may not be distinguishable by a genetic marker and may be inappropriate term as a classification for this discussion when you get into the details, but guess what? I don't care. It is not that important to me. I still think this is what CT was saying as well, but I'll add that even if he was saying exactly what you think he was, it doesn't change much about the overall question or negate other arguments, even by him.

When you get down to the nitty gritty, it is questionable whether Americans should be allowed dogs at all. The irresponsibility extends far beyond the maulings to neglect, inbreeding, cruelty, abandonment....we claim to be dog lovers but it is a very selfish love. I said it before in the other thread but any real pit bull lover should be pushing for a ban more than anyone else. Pits are the biggest victims in the whole dynamic. They are mass produced, trained for fighting, coveted by ****heads, feared and loathed, abandoned and destroyed, placed in situations where they hurt other animals and people then pay for it, isolated and chained....but hey as long as you can have the EXACT kind of dog YOU want in your yard then I guess you really care about them, right?
Very well put. I love pit bulls. I had an 85lb boxer/pit mix (died of old age) that was the sweetest dog. He was gentle around kids, my tiny shih tzu was the boss of him, and the only person/thing he ever bit was a burglar that entered our empty house on a Sunday afternoon(and left a bloody trail). I always knew that the pit required extra vigilance because of its potential. I adopted him when I was young, but realized with time that the extra risk/responsibility was not worth owning a pit over another breed. His head was monstrous, and the potential for damage enormous.

I have since recently adopted an Aussie Shepherd mix, whose siblings have the Aussie long hair, while mine has short hair indicative of a likely terrier (perhaps pit) mix that we have not DNA tested for confirmation. She is just as sweet as my old boxer/pit, and her head/jaw morphology carries a lot less risk. At the end of the day, a loving dog is a loving dog. Non pits offer the same rewards without the risks.

I am all for sterilization efforts coupled with responsible adoption of the current pit population. Phasing out pits seems like the responsible thing to do through aggressive sterilization efforts, coupled with added requirements for pit owners (extra insurance, criminal background checks etc). Determining which dogs are pits should be done through reputable DNA testing widely available (about $175 on Amazon). Oh, and F**** breeders.

Last edited by Derp!; 01-28-2018 at 06:53 PM.
01-28-2018 , 06:49 PM
Why can't more pit owners be reasonable about it like you - instead of: BUT MY PIT ITH THOOOOO THWEEEEEEET!!!!! LOOOK AT THIS FAAAAAAAACEEEEEE!!!!

One pit played with a baby one time therefore chessmate pit-haterz.
01-28-2018 , 06:52 PM
Why bother with adoption of the current population? That's just a negative externality to everyone else in the community.

These are dogs, not humans, we are talking about. Simply ordering their seizure and euthanizing all of them would be perfectly fine. There wouldn't even be a need to force your way into people's homes to round them up. Once it became illegal to take one outside almost no one would dare own one.

Let that sink in for a second. If a pit bull owner didn't take the dog outside, and expose others to the danger of their animal, it would likely become so aggressive it could no longer be kept in their home. Subjecting non-owners to unnecessary risk for no benefit which could not be provided by another type of dog (because the only distinguishing characteristics of these dogs is their fighting prowess and dominant tendencies) is immoral.

These dogs were bred to be weapons and they shouldn't be treated any differently than guns, imo. Ban them all, confiscate them all, as long as it takes, and destroy all of them.

      
m