Ask them why we can't do Sweden/Norway healthcare/welfare. If they say homogeneity, ask them why they're singing the praises of a city state with less people and square milage than a mid sized city.
It's not a bad healthcare system but Conservatives kind of gloss over the socialism that underlies the Singaporean capitalism
Quote:
Here’s what Singapore’s conservative admirers get right: Singapore really is the only truly universal health insurance system in the world based on the idea that patients, not insurers, should bear the costs of routine care.
But Singapore isn’t a free market utopia. Quite the opposite, really. It’s a largely state-run health care system where the government designed the insurance products with a healthy appreciation for free market principles — the kind of policy Milton Friedman might have crafted if he’d been a socialist.
Unlike in America, where the government’s main role is in managing insurance programs, Singapore’s government controls and pays for much of the medical system itself — hospitals are overwhelmingly public, a large portion of doctors work directly for the state, patients can only use their Medisave accounts to purchase preapproved drugs, and the government subsidizes many medical bills directly.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox...stem-explained
But without the underlying state ownership their Healthcare system would be a living hell, which is suspect a lot of Conservatives gloss over or ignore for the parts they like. Kind of like how they call Norway libertarian because there's no minimum wage
Also Singapore owns virtually all the land, housing, and much of the economy
Quote:
It is true of course that Singapore has a market economy. But it’s also true that, in Singapore, the state owns a huge amount of the means of production. In fact, depending on how you count it, the Singaporean government probably owns more capital than any other developed country in the world after Norway.
The Singaporean state*owns*90 percent of the country’s land. Remarkably, this level of ownership was not present from the beginning. In 1949, the state owned just 31 percent of the country’s land. It got up to 90 percent land ownership through*decades of forced sales, or what people in the US call eminent domain.
Quote:
Then there are the state-owned enterprises, which they euphemistically call Government-linked Companies (GLCs). Through its sovereign wealth fund Temasek, the Singaporean government*owns*a large share (20% or more) of 20 companies (2012 figure). Together these companies make up 37% of the market capitalization of the Singaporean stock market. The state also owns a large share of 8 real estate investment trust (REIT) companies (2012 figure), which they call GLREITs. The value of the GLREITs make up 54% of the country’s total REIT market.
https://peoplespolicyproject.org/201...gapore-really/