Obviously reasons don't matter, but going Kush because how can he even pretend to do his job without clearance. Maybe he can reverse it on Kelly or Magoo breaks Sessions or the black guy is expendable or Trump goes after Rosenstein before it's too late, idfk.
I was going with Sanders until I saw that... hand. The bla surgeon was fine until he broke his own rule about getting too comfortable and became visible.
"My Heart Will Go On" can be put to basically any epic moment in sports and it's amazing. It works especially well with goals in soccer. Here's a couple of my favorites:
Barca overcoming a 4-0 first leg defeat against PSG by scoring 3 goals in the last 7 minutes of the second leg, including this game winner at 90+5' by Sergi Roberto. Was in France watching this game. Good times.
El Clasico. Barca needed a win to stay in the race for the La Liga title and got a GW on a last minute rush.
Last edited by SuperUberBob; 03-01-2018 at 03:12 AM.
That's how out of touch he is. How is someone who doesn't understand that 31k for office furniture isn't good in charge of HUD, most of the people he serves probably don't make 31k a year...
Why TF would you spend $31k on a desk and not stick around to enjoy it?
A reminder that the desk was purchased with government money. There is a law that secretaries can only spend 5k without approval for their own office, so the HUD spokesperson said the desk was for general use. The desk is in his office.
I've had to work with some Olds lately, which has left me googling "boomers worst generation ever" and reading some interesting articles. I like this:
Quote:
Benefits, at least for the boomer middle class, were to be expanded — period. Taxes, for the same group, would be cut or reallocated. This dynamic illuminates otherwise inexplicable deviations from orthodoxy practiced by a machine supposedly seized by ideological gridlock. It explains why Reagan lowered taxes on income while raising them on capital gains (when boomers had salaries but not portfolios), why Bill Clinton lowered taxes on houses and stocks (when boomers owned those in quantity), and why Bush II cut taxes with unseemly attention lavished on the “death tax” (just as the boomers’ parents neared expiration) while embracing the largest expansion in welfare since the 1960s (Medicare Part D, in time to benefit aging boomers). The machine works, at least from the boomer perspective.