Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Many Gropings of Congress, starring Franken, Conyers, Barton, Farenthold, tbd The Many Gropings of Congress, starring Franken, Conyers, Barton, Farenthold, tbd

11-16-2017 , 03:56 PM
Guys, guys,

This is locker room. Nothingburger
11-16-2017 , 03:57 PM
Had to look up whether MN's gov was a D or R.
11-16-2017 , 03:58 PM
I bet Rocky wishes he was a Dem senator right now...
11-16-2017 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StimAbuser
Or he doesn't want to attack her, and is going to let the investigation and witnesses speak for themselves?

I think people are being extremely reactionary because of the Roy Moore stuff, wanting to show we're better than the other side. Wanting to end this guys career before there is even a single witness to corroborate the story.

If she is exaggerating or lying, he's taking about the highest road possible.
I guess my entire point is that we're never really going to reach the did or did it not happen phase because the only way to actually start traveling down that route is for the accused to actually issue a denial in the first place. The kiss happened.

At best, we wrangle over how bad the accusations were exaggerated, and maybe, hopefully, its not legally sexual assault.
11-16-2017 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
It seems pretty obvious that he is saying Leeann is a liar and is proceeding accordingly, but (possibly correctly) believes he can trick the credulous into believing he's doing something else by saying the magic "sorry" word and tossing some word salad about believing women.

Generally speaking, it seems better to interpret "believe women" as a rule of thumb to remind everyone that false allegations are rare rather than as a literal commandment to believe women even if you have direct personal knowledge that they are lying. I don't think Leeann is lying, but if she was and Franken knew it, why should he not be expected to just say so? You're paradoxically giving him greater space to weasel around by creating an exception to the expectation that he clearly state what he is claiming happened.
Intentional obtuseness is the internet's greatest gift to the world. Everyone you're talking with understands this intuitively but they're gonna make you waste all your time explaining it to them patiently before solemnly declaring that while you might be right, Franken deserves his investigation rather than Leeann Tweeden deserves to be believed. EVEN AS Franken apologizes for being a creep. Because Duke lacrosse or whatever the popular "lyin bitches get you every time" folktalk anecdote is these days.

"Nice rule of thumb ya got there, I acknowledge it should be followed in principle, never in practice."
11-16-2017 , 04:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Like the defense here seems to be, oh tut tut, we're way better than Roy Moore and those lousy GOPers who walk around saying "if true" when faced when sexual harassment allegations. We're true champions of women and leave it implicit instead of explicit.

Except it's sort of doubly bad because Al Franken is trying the Carter Page testifying in front of the Senate committee gambit: yeah well I did it, now prove the worst of it.
Wut

Roy Moores story had 30 corroborations and multiple women, all under 18. And that was just when the story broke. This story has one woman with zero corroborations so far. But saying hey, let's see if that kissing stuff is confirmed is being hypocritical?

I'm on the fence about the pic alone being enough. I guess that's where the debate really hangs, if it is enough obv he should resign. It might be, it's definitely creepy and inappropriate. It was also meant as a joke and not some sort of sexual assault, but it was a super poor joke in awful taste.

Last edited by StimAbuser; 11-16-2017 at 04:11 PM.
11-16-2017 , 04:10 PM
Her allegation relates to a skit where he kisses her. So the baseline is that they kiss. 100% ok, done every week on snl. The joke on snl is often the kisses go way over the line. The damning claim here is that he wanted to rehearse the kiss and went too far. If true it's bad, but again i find it odd the only allegations are from a friend of Hannity, with apparently no witness. That and a fake breast grab photo in a room with at least 4 people, when such photos are a completely standard trope. Also, i doubt it's even possible to sexually harass a sleeping person if you don't actually touch them. You could do some inappropriate things, but would not be sexual harassment.

You guys are going to summon the demon here--hot takes from elders about PC culture gone wild.
11-16-2017 , 04:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StimAbuser
Wut

Roy Moores story had 30 corroborations and multiple women, all under 18. And that was just when the story broke. This story has one woman with zero corroborations so far. But saying hey, let's see if that kissing stuff is confirmed is being hypocritical?

I'm on the fence about the pic alone being enough. I guess that's where the debate really hangs, if it is enough obv he should resign. It might be, it's definitely creepy and inappropriate. It was also meant as a joke and not some sort of sexual assault, but it was a super poor joke in awful taste.
But why do you hate women?
11-16-2017 , 04:16 PM
That picture should be the standard of "fit to hold a Senate seat"?
woof.
I'd like to see a poll on that.
And know what percent of the population could pass that standard.
11-16-2017 , 04:18 PM
If reducing Leeann Tweeden to a "friend of Hannity" is something you do in response to these allegations, I think there's still quite a lot of work to do on instilling the norm of "believe women" into our society
11-16-2017 , 04:21 PM
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/360...ts-his-apology

Most boring scandal ever.

Tweeden:You acted inappropriately.

Frankenstein: Yes, I acted inappropriately.

Tweeden: Ok that's all I was looking for.
11-16-2017 , 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFS

What the **** is wrong with you people. He did this to a co-worker. **** off if you think this is ever okay. I don't give a damn that he was a comedian, this is always sexual harassment. Oh and simplicitus, wtf? You can't sexually harass her while she is sleeping unless he touches her? Are you serious? Did you recently have a stroke or something?
11-16-2017 , 04:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
"Nice rule of thumb ya got there, I acknowledge it should be followed in principle, never in practice."
For me, the point of the slogan is that woman making allegations should be presumed credible insted of the opposite. And when there is 3 or 5 or whatever, that is strong evidence. But I think it's a wee bit hasty to call on someone who is widely regarded as a kind, thoughtful, and caring individual based on an ambiguous and ambiguously phrased allegations of someone whose job it is to smear libs like Franken. Maybe he is a harrasser or whatever. The Packwood ethics inquiry was 10 volumes and was damning. Maybe the Franken one will be too, but nothing in her post has led me to update my priors more than a few percent.
11-16-2017 , 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Franken deserves his investigation rather than Leeann Tweeden deserves to be believed.
You seem to be presenting a false dichotomy. If there was no there there, they would not be conducting an investigation. You get that, right? Like, if no one believed her, there would be no interest in an investigation.
11-16-2017 , 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/360...ts-his-apology

Most boring scandal ever.

Tweeden:You acted inappropriately.

Frankenstein: Yes, I acted inappropriately.

Tweeden: Ok that's all I was looking for.
Alright great work everyone, lock this thread up
11-16-2017 , 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
You seem to be presenting a false dichotomy. If there was no there there, they would not be conducting an investigation. You get that, right? Like, if no one believed her, there would be no interest in an investigation.
I agree Franken's take is better than a flat denial.
11-16-2017 , 04:32 PM
"But Republicans" is such a bad look. Just don't, Democrats.
11-16-2017 , 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by will1530
What the **** is wrong with you people. He did this to a co-worker. **** off if you think this is ever okay.
If they were both just soldiers, it would be fairly trivial. As Franken is holding and prospectively seeking public office at a very high level, it's not trivial, because politics is optics.
11-16-2017 , 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
"But Republicans" is such a bad look. Just don't, Democrats.
This one is even a partisan layup since Dayton can nominate another Democrat. What's the point of this? To save Franken's good name? He apologized for being an *******!

AT LEAST if it was a GOP governor we could have some meta "well, it would be better for women if the GOP didn't control the Senate" sort of navel gazing thing. I wouldn't be compelled but at least it's coherent.
11-16-2017 , 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 On Red
If they were both just soldiers, it would be fairly trivial. As Franken is holding and prospectively seeking public office at a very high level, it's not trivial, because politics is optics.
Maybe the army still sucks, I don't know. If I did that to a female sailor 10 years ago and that picture got out I would have been ****ed. Non-judicial punishment with a reduction in rank and restriction would have been all but guaranteed. Getting a less than honorable discharge would have been well within the range of reasonable punishment.
11-16-2017 , 04:43 PM
Do note that Franken was neither holding nor seeking public office at the time. He was a comedian doing a radio show.
11-16-2017 , 04:45 PM
Does Tweedens reply to Frankens apology change anyones view on the snap resign?
11-16-2017 , 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
Do note that Franken was neither holding nor seeking public office at the time. He was a comedian doing a radio show.
Same thing could have been said about Trump and the Grab Em By the Pussy incident. That's not really a good rationalization.
11-16-2017 , 04:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplicitus
Believe the woman is a rule of thumb, not an axiom.
What if they are both telling the truth?
11-16-2017 , 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
Alright great work everyone, lock this thread up
Nope. 200 posts at least.

      
m