Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
You're either a liar and a troll
You just love calling people names don't you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
or you must admit your opinions are wildly out of touch with mainstream American thought
The only opinion of mine that matters here is the one on the issue at hand, one that is in line with 90% of the Indiana Senate and 74% of the Indiana House. I'd say on this issue, you're the one "out of touch with mainstream".
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
(ie; Whackjob ie crank)
There you go with the insults again.
BTW, a few posts up you said your opinion on the drug war was at odds with most of America. Does that, by your definition, make you a "whackjob" or "crank"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
The only possible way you would have a case in that scenario
The scenario I claimed was that you were uninformed about the issue at hand, and so rather than articulate an intelligible rebuttal based on factual information you chose to fling metaphorical monkey poo in the form of ad hominem insults.
When you responded to the information you lacked with "If that's the case then it's fine", you made the case for me that you substituted personal attack for informed argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
is if you can stand and confidently say you know without fail every law, every court precedent and all SCOTUS rulings.
That's a ridiculous red herring.
Nobody knows "without fail every law, every court precedent and all SCOTUS rulings", and nobody needs to know them to substantiate the truth of what I claimed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
If so, kudos to you. If not, pathetic hypocrite.
Lol Pot -> Kettle
Last edited by Aptronym; 03-02-2012 at 09:21 PM.
Reason: punctuation