Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Law and Order 2 Law and Order 2

02-06-2012 , 10:18 PM
02-06-2012 , 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
Not to mention that all the kids in the neighboring trailers are getting exposed to hazardous chemicals
I was using "trailer park" for dramatic effect, in reality it's becoming more and more common in apartments which is obviously 10x worse, because in that environment neighborhood kids can still be ingesting the odors even if there is never an accident.

And obviously any explosion in an apartment is worse than one in a trailer or a house.
02-07-2012 , 03:16 AM

NSFW

I'd go "toe to toe in the middle of a cell" with her (assuming she's legal) AMIRITE?
02-07-2012 , 03:28 AM
So, after a second listen I've found a few issues I'd like to address with this performance. They are as follows:

[ ] Young *****

[ ] Brown

[ ] minority

[ ] Has Gold

[ ] Has Pager

[ ] selling narcotics

[ ] knows Lorenzo

[ ] has Benz

[ ] has nuts

[ ] is Ice Cube

[ ] From the CPT

[ ] Police are afraid

[ ] on war path

[ ] Knows Dr Dre

Did I miss anything?
02-07-2012 , 06:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
So, after a second listen I've found a few issues I'd like to address with this performance. They are as follows:

[ ] Young *****

[ ] Brown

[ ] minority

[x] Has Gold

[ ] Has Pager

[ ] selling narcotics

[ ] knows Lorenzo

[x] has Benz

[ ] has nuts

[ ] is Ice Cube

[ ] From the CPT

[ ] Police are afraid

[ ] on war path

[ ] Knows Dr Dre

Did I miss anything?
fyp
02-07-2012 , 04:03 PM
Gotta grant you those two. GC
02-08-2012 , 02:48 AM
What level do you work on? City/county/state/fed?
02-08-2012 , 02:57 AM
I was a Deputy Sheriff.
02-08-2012 , 03:15 AM
You support Posse Comitatus?
02-08-2012 , 05:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Gribble
You support Posse Comitatus?
Get out of here with that **** you cop killing supporting freak.

Just because I happen to be the one flavor of cop you support with your crazy ****ing political beliefs doesn't mean I support your ******ed views.

I hope you're on a watch list.
02-08-2012 , 01:50 PM
I just googled posse comitatus and I am not sure why you responded like that. I don't think wikipedia is providing enough context for this issue.
02-08-2012 , 02:15 PM
I don't get it either
02-08-2012 , 02:23 PM
Perhaps you should click on the 2nd wikipedia article listed for a Posse Comitatus search.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_C..._(organization)
02-08-2012 , 02:42 PM
I still don't see where the cop killing part comes in.
02-08-2012 , 03:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Case Closed
I still don't see where the cop killing part comes in.
Didn't see the criminal activities part?
02-08-2012 , 03:46 PM
Posse Comitatus is a belief held by the Sovereign Citizen Movement. At first glance this group appears to be a libertarian type group, but they are not.

This group is terrorist organization, known in Law Enforcement circles for Paper Terrorism.

They're also responsible for the 2010 West Memphis Police Shootings as well as the killings of two US Marshals and a Sheriff. They're also heavily engaged in real estate fraud. This group has been, for these reasons and others, on the FBI terrorism watch list for quite some time.




Any questions or loose ends let me know.
02-08-2012 , 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Didn't see the criminal activities part?
No, I saw that there was a lot of history in that term going back several hundred years. Double Barrel gave a good explanation, kind of what I thought after I read a little. But I wanted to get his actual opinion on it, it's not cool to assume other's opinions.

Good explanation from Double Barrel. Makes sense why he would hate on them so hard.
02-08-2012 , 04:40 PM
As to be expected his explanation and opinion is extremely biased. If unfamiliar with the sovereign / freeman on the land concept you should do your own research, you'll certainly learn a few things and ideally become conscious of those who choose to poison the well.
02-08-2012 , 04:45 PM
We had several of these guys that lived over in the city jurisdiction. We'd have to go deal with them because as you saw in the wiki article, and my initial response, the view the Sheriff, and his deputies as a legitimate law enforcement entity. They do not view city cops/state police/Federal agents as legitimate authorities.

This belief comes from the belief that the Sheriff is a local elected official. In a practical sense I agree with the theory. However I do not believe just because of the theory that I am justified to murder any police officer who is not a deputy sheriff.

They also believe they are to lynch the Sheriff for "Failing to uphold the law/Constitution.

Real wackos.
02-08-2012 , 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverFenix
As to be expected his explanation and opinion is extremely biased. If unfamiliar with the sovereign / freeman on the land concept you should do your own research, you'll certainly learn a few things and ideally become conscious of those who choose to poison the well.
I agree. The literature that the Freemen themselves put out is much more LOLtarded than my explaination.

Can you find us some classic material about how the US has been under Martial Law since the Civil War, and how FDR sold the citizens to the debtors at the Geneva Convention and how your social security number links to a secret gubmint bank acct?
02-08-2012 , 04:59 PM


One of my favs.
02-08-2012 , 07:42 PM
Here's a link to a website on the Sovereign/Freeman on the Land idea. As you'll note, this is not an FBI brief, it is a site created by an actual Freeman.

These ideas espoused in this link are not rare, they are commonplace and can be found if you know the "Buzzwords". Searching for "Sovereign Citizen" will pull up reports from SCLC and ADF.

Search "Gold Fringed Flag" "United States v United States SCOTUS" "USA is a Corporation" for good lolz.
02-08-2012 , 08:16 PM
Your Lawyers Secret Oath???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeman
Since the Erie vs. Thompkins case was decided, the practice of law in this country was never again to be the same. It has been reported, that every lawyer in existence, and every lawyer coming up has to take a "secret" oath to support bankruptcy. As Officers of the Court they have sworn to uphold the law as it exists, and as they have been taught. In so doing, not only do the lawyers promise to support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers and judges promise never to reveal who the true creditor/party is in the bankruptcy proceedings (if, indeed, many of them are even aware or know). In court, there is never identification and appearance of the true character and principle of the proceedings. If there is no appearance of the true party to the action, then there is no way the defendant is able to know the TRUE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE ACTION. You are never told the true NATURE AND CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is forbidden to tell you that information.

That's why, if you question the true nature and cause, the judge will tell you "It's not my job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney and I can't give you legal advice from the bench. I suggest you hire a lawyer."

HIRE A LAWYER?
The problem here is, if you hire a lawyer who is pledged not to reveal the true nature and the cause, how will you ever find out the nature and the cause? YOU WON'T! If the true nature and the cause of the action against you is revealed, it will expose the real creditor from whom this action and cause came. In other words, they will have to name the TRUE creditor. The true creditor will have to state the nature and the cause. The true creditor will have to say "It's a bankruptcy proceeding." The true creditor will have to say, "I'm the creditor and he's the debtor."

That declaration would open the door for you to question "Who the hell are you? How did you get attached to my back and by what vehicle did I promise to become a debtor to you?" In this country, the courts on every level, from the justice of the peace level all the way up...... even into the International law arena, (called the World Court), are administrating the bankruptcy and are pledged not to reveal who the true creditors really are and how you personally became pledged as a party or participant to the corporate United States debt. What would really kill these people off, would be to compel the International Bankers to send a lawyer into the courtroom and present himself as the attorney for THE TRUE CREDITOR, THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS. THEN, HAVE THE ATTORNEY PUT INTO THE RECORD THE TRUE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE PROCEEDING AGAINST YOU ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY.

The International Bankers told these various countries that they were now in a state of bankruptcy. The countries had been taken over by the creditor/bankers. And there was no choice, but for all these participating countries to declare bankruptcy. If they didn't agree to declare bankruptcy, the bankers threatened to collapse the economies and thereby put the countries back into the depression like the one from which they were just emerging. The bankers made an offer they couldn't refuse. To review and elaborate: In 1930 there was a world wide depression.

The Bankers said, "Look. You can do it either of two ways. The easy way or the hard way." "You just accept the bankruptcy and we'll let you out of the depression. If you don't, you're on your own." So all the countries involved agreed, because they realized that the International bankers had them by the throat. The countries therefore agreed that over a period of several years that they would pass statutes and legislation for the implementation of the bankruptcy in favor of the international bankers.
BTW, when this is read in conjunction with other writings, "banker" essentially means "Dirty Jew".

Last edited by DblBarrelJ; 02-08-2012 at 08:21 PM.
02-08-2012 , 08:35 PM
As a law student I eagerly await my secret indoctrination.
02-08-2012 , 08:48 PM
Well since I'm the one who gave you the heads up I expect a full tr. I know you can't do it publicly for fear a boogeyman will kill you, but you can pm it to me. It'll be our secret.

      
m