Quote:
The earlier takes in this thread about Trump wanting the house to investigate him are 100% correct, he wants to force a conflict just like he did with Acosta yesterday at that presser. His base will 100% eat up a "nancy pelosi is leading a rigged witch hunt" line, they're already eating it up right now, just go look at their facebook pages.
What's the old line? The fascist's goal is not the win, but the struggle. Something like that.
Trump has some subtle, blunt political skills. Assuming you choose to be a criminal grifty politician, Trump has the 'correct' play to essentially semi-bluff: he spends the whole time declaring any and all investigations rigged witch hunts and signaling to his base that it's a partisan issue to get triggered about, and so either Mueller (or the House Democrats) 'exonerates' him because Mueller can't prove collusion ("NO COLLUSION!!! WE WON" meow chow) or Mueller finds some damning ****, but his party doesn't care because they've sequestered the investigation into the partisan spaces of their mind.
Politicians who play coy and let investigations simply play out without comment because they're afraid being seen as partisan or combative will alienate people are probably correct enough that a combative, partisan pose will alienate
some people, but it closes down really any path but for exoneration. Trump gives himself two ways to win, by defining his guilt so narrowly that nothing could qualify and by disqualifying the investigation such that any unflattering determination is dismissed anyway.
He calculated and understood one simple thing, that he could win the right's affections on white identity, that the GOP wasn't really fulfilling the need, and from there he can do anything, they were so desperate for a white power chieftain to adopt and amplify their grievances that they'd just go along with whatever.
Last edited by DVaut1; 11-08-2018 at 06:59 PM.