Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Jeff Bezos Is Now Worth Over 0 Billion Jeff Bezos Is Now Worth Over 0 Billion

10-19-2018 , 12:20 AM
Hey guys, a socialist did something useful once. Yeah socialism! Its obviously the bestest system out there. Of course he didn’t exactly do it all by himself. We’re also not sure if he’s actually a socialist. We should also focus on this one person and not look at all the accomplishments from capitalists. Yeah socialism! That’s chessmate bitches!
10-19-2018 , 12:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Finland is mostly socialist and produced Linus, I'm giving them credit for his politics. His giving it away as well as the FOSS movement in general is always going to be a counter argument to people not doing hard things without a profit motive.
Oh, okay. I don't think of Finland as a socialist country, but I get what you mean.
10-19-2018 , 01:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
I got that. It's the socialist claim I'm questioning. He's from Finland and now a U.S. citizen, not that the latter is relevant.
Of course it's relevant! Finland is the USSR's neighbor and long-time ally. It would be natural for him to take his talents there. Why did he choose to go halfway across the world instead?
10-19-2018 , 01:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praetor1an
Hey guys, a socialist did something useful once. Yeah socialism! Its obviously the bestest system out there. Of course he didn’t exactly do it all by himself. We’re also not sure if he’s actually a socialist. We should also focus on this one person and not look at all the accomplishments from capitalists. Yeah socialism! That’s chessmate bitches!
I don't think that you as a capitalist really want to go down the "he didn't do it all himself" path.
10-19-2018 , 01:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
Oh, okay. I don't think of Finland as a socialist country, but I get what you mean.
Also this. Kerowo might not be paying attention, but half the people here think Finland is part of the unsustainable liberal western-style democracy that needs to be toppled over and rebuilt from the ruins up.
10-19-2018 , 02:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Alex.
This is the original post that I referenced. Not using a service and then attributing people's appreciation for the company to hero worship of the owner.
You're absolutely right. I'm not being totally serious to call it 'hero worship' so that's not the most appropriate if we're having a serious discussion.



Quote:

It's like the Musk thing where you guys assume some kind of hard-on for the dude when in reality we just love the idea of electric cars and space travel.



...
The Musk thing is a good tangent. There are some posts I want to dig up but let me rain-check that until tomorrow.
10-19-2018 , 09:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Alex.
Also this. Kerowo might not be paying attention, but half the people here think Finland is part of the unsustainable liberal western-style democracy that needs to be toppled over and rebuilt from the ruins up.
Of course Alex may be trying to deflect from the point that profit motive didn't drive the development of Linux, which means it's possible that people would still be motivated to do things without a pure profit motive. Which was the original point, not whatever tangent he's trying to foist on us here.
10-19-2018 , 11:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Of course Alex may be trying to deflect from the point that profit motive didn't drive the development of Linux, which means it's possible that people would still be motivated to do things without a pure profit motive. Which was the original point, not whatever tangent he's trying to foist on us here.
Sure. I don't doubt that. But en mass will they be as motivated as a group that has a profit motive in play as well. I think the answer is a resounding "no," based on historical precedent on the one hand and our understanding of human nature on the other.
10-19-2018 , 11:12 AM
What historical precedent do you have that reducing the profit motive reduces entrepreneurship?
10-19-2018 , 11:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
What historical precedent do you have that reducing the profit motive reduces entrepreneurship?
Einbert's avatar
10-19-2018 , 11:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
My reason is simply to increase productivity in low-wage sectors. It's that or the beatings will continue....
Right. I get that. I'm saying that you don't need to lower the taxes on capital gains to get that because we're not suffering for lack of potential investment. The bottleneck is on a weak labor market meaning companies don't have to pay their employees more or invest in automation or really improve productivity that much.
10-19-2018 , 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Right. I get that. I'm saying that you don't need to lower the taxes on capital gains to get that because we're not suffering for lack of potential investment. The bottleneck is on a weak labor market meaning companies don't have to pay their employees more or invest in automation or really improve productivity that much.
Maybe you're right. Maybe we could even raise the rate. I'm not dug-in on ideological grounds on what the rate should be. My tax range is 0-100% based on what works best. I would say we need to be prepared to lower the rate if a bottleneck shows up.
10-19-2018 , 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
Einbert's avatar
So we avoid a brutal dictatorship and we're golden then!
10-19-2018 , 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
I don't think that you as a capitalist really want to go down the "he didn't do it all himself" path.
Why not? We’re already calling a dude who owns 10s of millions worth of shares in a for profit software company a socialist.
10-19-2018 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
So we avoid a brutal dictatorship and we're golden then!
Right, because if we prevent people from competing for money, they won't compete all the more for power through other means. We've seen that movie too.
10-19-2018 , 01:52 PM
Why are you such an absolutist? We aren't asking to stop people from competing for money, we're asking for them to not be able to compete for ALL the money.
10-19-2018 , 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Why are you such an absolutist? We aren't asking to stop people from competing for money, we're asking for them to not be able to compete for ALL the money.
They’re not competing for "ALL the money" because there’s no such thing. Socialists tend to view the economy like a poker game where one person’s gain comes from another’s loss, i.e., a zero-sum game. It’s not. I’m not saying the average American can become a multi-billionaire like Bezos, but they can at least become a millionaire or near enough if they put in the same sort of effort Bezos did.
10-19-2018 , 02:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
They’re not competing for "ALL the money" because there’s no such thing. Socialists tend to view the economy like a poker game where one person’s gain comes from another’s loss, i.e., a zero-sum game. It’s not. I’m not saying the average American can become a multi-billionaire like Bezos, but they can at least become a millionaire or near enough if they put in the same sort of effort Bezos did.
If every single American put in that kind of effort (instead of being lazy roofers and such) how many would become millionaires?
10-19-2018 , 03:05 PM
Maybe it's just me but becoming a millionaire after getting $300k in starting capital isn't super impressive.
10-19-2018 , 03:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
If every single American put in that kind of effort (instead of being lazy roofers and such) how many would become millionaires?
I meant effort in terms of financial planning and whatnot. To your question: every single American.
10-19-2018 , 03:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
Maybe it's just me but becoming a millionaire after getting $300k in starting capital isn't super impressive.
Well if you had given Bezos $300K in start-up capital, you'd be worth over $30 billion today. If not super, that's at least somewhat impressive. Imagine all the good you could do with that.
10-19-2018 , 03:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
I meant effort in terms of financial planning and whatnot. To your question: every single American.
The wealth of nations is not a zero sum game, but this isn't even close to true.
10-19-2018 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
I meant effort in terms of financial planning and whatnot. To your question: every single American.

Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
The wealth of nations is not a zero sum game, but this isn't even close to true.
Those kids born to addicted single mothers who have heroin in their system from birth, who grew up and went to the worst schools with 0 funding no textbooks let alone computers got busted for a single blunt and railroaded into the no escape hell of the for profit prison system should've worked harder and they too could have been millionaires. Lazy bastards.
10-19-2018 , 03:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Those kids born to addicted single mothers who have heroin in their system from birth, who grew up and went to the worst schools with 0 funding no textbooks let alone computers got busted for a single blunt and railroaded into the no escape hell of the for profit prison system should've worked harder and they too could have been millionaires. Lazy bastards.
Obviously this is true. But, imo, it's also true that if everyone in the world were a Jeff Bezos clone, raised exactly as Jeff Bezos was, not everyone would be a millionaire - not even close.
10-19-2018 , 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Those kids born to addicted single mothers who have heroin in their system from birth, who grew up and went to the worst schools with 0 funding no textbooks let alone computers got busted for a single blunt and railroaded into the no escape hell of the for profit prison system should've worked harder and they too could have been millionaires. Lazy bastards.
Obviously. But they're what I would consider well below average in terms of circumstances.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
I’m not saying the average American can become a multi-billionaire like Bezos, but they can at least become a millionaire or near enough if they put in the same sort of effort Bezos did.

      
m