Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
January LC Thread : Survivor White House Edition January LC Thread : Survivor White House Edition
View Poll Results: Who will NOT survive the month of January?
Matthew Whitaker
9 24.32%
Kjrstyn Njielessen
7 18.92%
Sarah Huckabee Sanders
4 10.81%
Steve Mnuchin
4 10.81%
Wilbur Ross
2 5.41%
Stephen Miller
0 0%
Rod Rosenstein
3 8.11%
Roger Stone*
3 8.11%
Donald Trump Jr*
2 5.41%
Write-in
3 8.11%

01-02-2019 , 07:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mosdef
In the context of the article, the issue is it that companies can walk away from underfunded defined benefit pensions by declaring bankruptcy. 401(k) plans are by definition never underfunded, so companies generally can't get away from their obligation. Once their contributions are in the plan, they stay in the plan.
I know. If there is a pension to be ****ed with, there aren’t 401(k)s around.
01-02-2019 , 10:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
It's Mason, who is clearly intelligent.
Ouch. Mason is pretty dumb, but not quite "Chezlaw thinks you're intelligent" dumb. That's harsh.
01-02-2019 , 11:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrollyWantACracker
Ouch. Mason is pretty dumb, but not quite "Chezlaw thinks you're intelligent" dumb. That's harsh.
except he clearly isn't 'pretty dumb' either.

but I suspect you know that as you're also clearly intelligent
01-02-2019 , 11:26 AM
He's intelligent in some ways but certainly dumb in some other critical way or he wouldn't support Trump. The same goes for Tooth, another Trump supporter.
01-02-2019 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
He's intelligent in some ways but certainly dumb in some other critical way or he wouldn't support Trump. The same goes for Tooth, another Trump supporter.
In fairness he probably is quite rich. Probably rich enough to actually benefit from the trump tax cuts, and old enough not to worry too much about climate change, and white, and was good friends with brucez for several years... Perhaps dumbness isn't the issue at hand.
01-02-2019 , 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
He's intelligent in some ways but certainly dumb in some other critical way or he wouldn't support Trump. The same goes for Tooth, another Trump supporter.
It's a very strange view of intelligence. Handy but strange.

you probably need to upgrade your name calling system.
01-02-2019 , 11:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
It's a very strange view of intelligence. Handy but strange.

you probably need to upgrade your name calling system.
If you don't know that people can be highly skilled in some academic areas but weak in other areas, maybe you should go away and have a think about the meaning of words you use.
01-02-2019 , 11:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
you should go away
FYP
01-02-2019 , 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
If you don't know that people can be highly skilled in some academic areas but weak in other areas, maybe you should go away and have a think about the meaning of words you use.
Sure there's a difference between 'skill' and 'intelligence'.

words - what are they like?
01-02-2019 , 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Sure there's a difference between 'skill' and 'intelligence'.

words - what are they like?
Putting nit picking to one side, there are some obvious recent examples of public figures whose first class degrees from Oxbridge were a reasonable sign of "intelligence" but whose decision-making in critically important jobs since then was disastrously poor. I wonder if you can think of any?
01-02-2019 , 12:01 PM
Intelligent people can make bad decisions. They can also have different views of the world, different constraints, different priorities etc. People, including highly intelligent ones, can also be very poor at reasoning from outcomes

Some intelligent people even claim that obviously intelligent people are stupid - you knew they're wrong, don't you? and yet they're not stupid people.
01-02-2019 , 12:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw

but I suspect you know that as you're also clearly intelligent
Whelp, guess I walked right into that one. nh
01-02-2019 , 12:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Intelligent people can make bad decisions. They can also have different views of the world, different constraints, different priorities etc. People, including highly intelligent ones, can also be very poor at reasoning from outcomes

Some intelligent people even claim that obviously intelligent people are stupid - you knew they're wrong, don't you? and yet they're not stupid people.
They're wrong for the same reason I gave - that intelligence is assumed to apply across a range of mental faculties whereas in reality many people are quite lop-sided in their intelligence.

It's not uncommon for people to be very good at maths and other forms of abstraction, for example, but have below average spatial awareness or empathy levels (there are probably technical terms for these that I'm not aware of). Intelligent or not intelligent?

Last edited by jalfrezi; 01-02-2019 at 12:23 PM. Reason: It's almost as if talent for different disciplines were located in different areas of the brain. Imagine that!
01-02-2019 , 12:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrollyWantACracker
Whelp, guess I walked right into that one. nh
Hold on, maybe it's one of those paradoxes designed to destroy AI? Akin to something "This statement is unprovable according to the rules of your system"
01-02-2019 , 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrollyWantACracker
Whelp, guess I walked right into that one. nh
txs. Good start to the year when someone spots one of my fine witticisms
01-02-2019 , 12:31 PM
Theory: The left should be more concerned about the absence of a Hastert rule in the new House rules package than they are about the inclusion of PAYGO.
01-02-2019 , 12:37 PM
I don't know about you but I prefer TAGO MAGO to PAYGO.
01-02-2019 , 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
One of the things we do at Two Plus Two is to think about how poker is doing. The better it’s doing, the more books we should print, the more new titles we can take on, the more investment we can put into our website, and so on. Also, from a player’s perspective, the better poker does, the better the games will be, and the better the games are the more money the people we cater to will make. So what’s our current prediction? And why do we feel this way?

Well, our prediction is simple. We think the games over the next two or three years will get better and better, and if you’re a good poker player today, it’ll seem like you’re an even better poker player tomorrow because your expectation should rise. So why is this?

The answer is simple. Life in America is barely tolerable, and I subscribe to the idea that it’s only going to get worse. Of course, this creates much desire for heavy drinking.

This brings us to the heart of the matter. On our website, we have many posters who literally hate President Donald Trump. But from a poker perspective, his demeanour, his policies, such as they are, and that includes the tax cut, plus just the sheer knowledge that he is POTUS, will, in my opinion, mean that we should see a growth in reckless drinking like we haven't seen since the Great Depression.

So for all you poker playing Trump haters out there, my advice is to think again.

Best Wishes,
ChrisV
Based on the bolded I assumed this was written by Phil Simms
01-02-2019 , 01:21 PM
I heard this ridiculous **** otw to work this morning. TEH RAPTURE

01-02-2019 , 01:31 PM
Dealing with this kind of crazy should be 10x the priority of dealing with immigrants, though age and the broader culture are dealing with it in their way.

Why Trump Reigns as King Cyrus

Quote:
The month before the 2018 midterms, a thousand theaters screened “The Trump Prophecy,” a film that tells the story of Mark Taylor, a former firefighter who claims that God told him in 2011 that Donald Trump would be elected president.

At a critical moment in the film, just after the actor representing Mr. Taylor collapses in the flashing light of an epiphany, he picks up a Bible and turns to the 45th chapter of the book of Isaiah, which describes the anointment of King Cyrus by God. In the next scene, we hear Mr. Trump being interviewed on “The 700 Club,” a popular Christian television show.

As Lance Wallnau, an evangelical author and speaker who appears in the film, once said, “I believe the 45th president is meant to be an Isaiah 45 Cyrus,” who will “restore the crumbling walls that separate us from cultural collapse.”
01-02-2019 , 01:35 PM
So that makes Trump's grandson this guy?

01-02-2019 , 03:27 PM
https://twitter.com/swin24/status/1080518438416797696
01-02-2019 , 03:43 PM
actually sad

01-02-2019 , 03:59 PM
Really interesting read: The guy who runs a fake hitman for hire scheme on the Dark Web, and the guy who repeatedly hacks him to try to unmask the people who legitimately think they are paying for others to be killed

Details one confirmed murder that a client did on his own after trying to use the site, and another questionable one that police ruled a suicide but was very likely a murder.

Also points out some incredible incompetence/nonchalance from the FBI/NCA (the UK's FBI, I think?) as the hacker basically giftwraps them info of "hey, this guy in your jurisdiction paid thousands of dollars worth of bitcoin to have someone murdered" and they mostly ignore him, except for the time they swarm his apartment with a SWAT team to arrest him on suspicion of being part of the site. Oh and the time they warn him that hacking the hitman site to get this info is illegal.
01-02-2019 , 04:18 PM
rip i loved him as george bluth's surrogate

      
m