Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
lol so? This has been standard procedure for almost a decade. Palestinian Arab leaders act like *******s, Israel announces housing approvals. Congratulations, you have basic pattern recognition skills.
Anyhoo, the minister issued
approvals 1,500 units, but how many of those actually get built?
Peace Now/Shalom Achshav has an outline of the process
here, if you have any interest in educating yourself (who are we kidding, you don't).
But according to that website, each house undergoes as many as
8 different approvals before building can actually begin. But media does not distinguish between different stages of approval, so for all of the thousands and thousands of approvals, we need to know how many actual houses get built.
And, naturally, despite the screaming and bitching, even from President Obama (
who appears to be grossly misinformed on the issue),
the actual number of housing starts in the entire West Bank is down severely:
Quote:
Overall there were 2,580 new starts in West Bank settlements in 2013, a sharp rise from 1,190 starts in 2012. But the largest number of starts – 981 – occurred in the first quarter of 2013.
In the first three months of 2014, in contrast, there were only 232 housing starts in settlements.
The number of finished homes also fell, dropping by 38.9%, from 257 in the first quarter of 2013 to 157 in the first three months of this year. Again that number was vastly different from the 2% nationwide dip in the number of finished homes.
So it appears there is a deliberate policy of slowing down housing construction in the West Bank, and 150 homes per quarter to cover an annual increase of about 7,500 (or 1,800 pro-rated for consistency) people last year is causing families to be choked. But human rights only apply to Palestinian Arabs, so no worries there.
But none of this matters. Because, governments are starting to wise up. As I've posted several times, the "illegality" of the settlements is hardly a settled issue.
The government of Australia has courageously acknowledged this fact. The "illegal" nature of the "occupation" has been universally accepted on political grounds, with the actual, objective, legal analysis having taken a back seat.
Fortunately, Eugene Kontorovich, Professor of International Law at Northwestern University, has penned a
thorough, tightly-argued analysis of the legal issues at play when calling the West Bank "occupied" - in light of the recent Russian takeover of Crimea. The tl/dr is that actual law supports Israel's claim to the West Bank, and UN resolutions simply do not reflect international law unless there is a political incentive to do so:
Quote:
Israel should not be too put out by the international community’s failure to apply its general rules to the Jewish state’s rights, for the Ukrainian crisis also shows the limits of those rules. Ukraine may enjoy international backing for its claims while Israel does not. But the Ukrainian crisis also shows that when it comes to action, the international community will be driven primarily by the exigencies and conveniences of the moment, not by considerations of legality or past promises.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
It's scary to think that this rogue state, determined to continue to break international law in a mass ethnic cleansing effort, has nukes and is willing to go it alone.
Notice the expansion had been continuing so there is really nothing new here besides the antagonistic attribution and timing.
This is absolutely, full blown, ignoramus crazy. You don't seem to provide any evidence for what a rogue state is, what ethnic cleansing is, what international law is, whether Israel has nukes, and what Israel's level of integration with the international community is. Calling me a propagandist is the most blatant example of psychological projection I've ever witnessed.
Last edited by Gamblor; 06-12-2014 at 02:46 PM.