adopt japan's gun laws and disarm the police. they can still have SWAT teams but no more open carry for cops on the beat

if any police protest and threaten to quit, put them on terrorist watch lists

rednecks don't care bout nascar anymore, they know it's been stolen from them. twoplustwo doesn't know any conservatives.

something close to real legislation that of course would likely not pass is, after three or four generations since america is an economic engine your family has to move to so me other country so america doesn't get lazy.

https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedNews/sta...86807661469696

ScreaminAsian,

The question is what would Democrats do if they were evil, not if they were competent.

oops

Put stupid windmills everywhere to kill all the birds and destroy the beauty of all nature

Raise the gas tax by a couple of bucks, and make highway subsidies proportional to federal revenue collected. Build smart infrastructure using federal funds and chronically unemployed workers.

Establish/increase ammo tax, remove liability exemption from gun manufacturers, establish point system for firearm/ammo purchase, similar to car insurance point system. Parking ticket = $1/bullet, speeding = $25/bullet, drunken disorderly = $500/bullet, etc.

Aggressively enforce/increase grazing fees, and use the money to purchase more land to turn into federal parks. Put up statues of civil rights heroes in the parks.

Remove immigration limits, make it a 3 month process to become a citizen, make federal funds contingent on resettling refugees/new immigrants.

IQ testing requirements for voting and mandatory vegan school lunches.

None of that is cruel. The answer is assigning black folk an involuntary white indentured servant.

Also, I know this is supposed to be a joke thread but it seems like some of you are exposing... something. Democrat liberals being hooked to an IV drip of organic kale smoothie liquid was supposed to be fantasyland, remember?

Or maybe it's just me getting triggered at the mentions of 'junk food'. That's easily in my top5. Not only is there no such thing as 'junk food', only a culture and society of obscene and unseemly wealth and privilege could ever even dream up the notion of creating a term like 'junk food'.

they would support federal hurricane relief for blue states and oppose it for red states

Jesus, did you major in this?

We should do 2 or 3 of the things on Minirra's list.

Some of them are quite a window into some very confused thinking.

3 & 5 definitely, 1 is worthy of consideration and 2 would troll the **** out of hunters, but then I thought nah I reckon you're a Seinfeld fan and would therefore go for 4

3 and 5 were my picks with 1 as a maybe. I thought about 2 as well.

Screw banning hunting. Ban the sale of meat. Only people who hunt should be allowed to eat meat.

That should come first anyway. But, not being a totalitarian or a vegetarian I'd go with soft power and PSAs on this issue.

Oh, the next step is to disallow the sale of food, and only let people be freegans, thus encouraging dumpster diving. Y'know, just to piss off conservatives.

Phasing out civilization and returning to subsistance hunting and gathering is the smart move. Better to retire from civ while it's our choice and we're not forced into it.

If you're not genetically modifying your gut bacteria to consume dirt, you're getting left behind.

I have thought for a while that this is the left's golden opportunity to go hard left; many of the more center-aligned democrats like me basically have no other party to vote for, the Democrats could go full FlyWf and I'd still have to vote for them...

I don't think I would vote for someone who proposed this policy.

Didn't you see HRC had the most progressive platform in American history?

I don't get it.

Perhaps "the most progressive platform in American history" isn't the same as hard left, but you said you'd have to vote for them unless it was an obvious cynical ploy to position oneself as left while assuming the center and even center right would come along feeling they had no choice.

Do you mean you'll only refuse to vote for people who are really hard left but openly say that they are better for the center than the GOP? But you'd vote for them if they didn't say that?

I assume you voted for HRC, so I don't get it. Pandering in and of itself obviously isn't a disqualifier.