Quote:
Originally Posted by PFunkaliscious
I almost completely stopped participating in the politics forum. It is populated with a cult like devotion to,"Trump bad obama good." Not that Trump is any political genius or that he is worth defending, but it is just a waste of time to debate with others who have zero interest in the dialectic. Moreover, wookie and goofy are still mods, so the risk of collecting infractions for committing the same acts of trolling that others in the forum go unpunished for is annoying. The forum is simply an echo chamber that has almost zero value in regards to new information or interesting opinions. But thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback.
Cheers.
Posters like this are why people say things like "reality has a liberal bias"
It's a nonsense phrase. Reality is reality. There is no liberal or conservative bias in the real world truth of things. It just is
The reason the phrase exists is because that's a reflection of the state of American politics. The right wing is FUBAR, the centrist Dem is now jokingly called a Republican, and "radical" views like UHC are demonized as socialist, which is a dirty word for no other reason than people who think this subforum is an echo chamber, "Trump bad Obama good", monolithic group when really it's just a large number of people ranging left, Independent, and center right calling out right wing and conservative disingenuous discourse for their bull****
And Paul D, this is why I say "no excuse". While I do feel that there has been some marked improvement in the forum in general, there are some things I still do not like, and the bottom line is Mason only put forth "the changes" because his view is similar to that of PFunk's. It's cool that Mason supports the free flow and exchange of ideas, but choosing not to participate in a politics forum or threatening to ban people or shut down the entire platform because you get directly criticized and refuse to directly address flaws in your own arguments are the antithesis of fluidity given to all viewpoints.
If you can't argue with intellectual honesty, then you don't have an argument to begin with.