Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Who made you the king of saying what LTism is?
The term was think tanked up by the usual business lobbyist groups just after WW2, was popularized by one of the Koch bros running for VPOTUS in the 1970s, and today primarily exists as the think tank arm of the Kochtopus. Also a insignificant remnant of the Official LTism Party straggles on nominating G.Johnson for unknown reasons.
Besides, the NAP is a buncha childish crap. What, have you been in a coma the last few years ??
Yes, you're right, you're the king. Fly is the king, Mark Levin is a libertarian! LOL! Buchanan is a libertarian LOL! It's not a disingenuous game of CONNECT THE DOTS. You're like all super sleuths here, and I'm just playing the same game with (D) Senator Byrd, right? To me this is somewhat symbolic of the lack-of-inquiry on the left, and how everything just bounces off the walls from one tabloid to another, one blog to another, etc. Connect the Dots is not a Trival Pursuit, lol.
The term Kochtopus was created by SEK3, an agoristarian, which is more where I am at. The NAP is very logical when properly understood and applied. It's quite foolish to allow people to over claim property, and land, and this leads to all kinds of disputes that could be avoided, largely nation-states with their vast territorial claims, landing in dispute time and time again, and going to war time and time again.
Basically, the word libertarian has no meaning anymore. The LP is populated with Constitutionalists these days. The ancaps kind'a left. GJ was no threat in the debates, but I think the LP's case for allowing them in the debates would've been stronger if they picked someone smarter. I also think HC had better chances inviting GJ to the debate.
Last edited by leavesofliberty; 01-30-2017 at 07:36 PM.