Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Great ObamaCare Debate, Part 237: Back to Court The Great ObamaCare Debate, Part 237: Back to Court

04-03-2017 , 10:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
20k a year child care for two kids is standard IMO. My wife and I make 160k a year combined and we drop 10.5k a year on day care for our 1.5 year old daughter. And it's not like we're sending her to some fancy private school, just the local JCC, which has prices comparable to most of the other day cares in our area. Child care is ****ing expensive.
and at that age/developmental stage, she needs $6k/yr worth of music/tutoring lessons?
04-03-2017 , 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevepra
That budget had 20k for each child. We paid an amount comparable to you. But, I do know some people who paid about 15k per child. That was just the going rate for daycare where they live. I don't think it's too crazy for 20k per child in the most expensive parts of the country, though I haven't researched it.
I live in a cheap, economically depressed area, I'm sure 20k isn't unreasonable if you live in an expensive city.
04-03-2017 , 10:52 PM
as a non-parent, when everyone says say "childcare" in this context what does that entail? Just daycare while parents are at work?
04-03-2017 , 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymmv
as a non-parent, when everyone says say "childcare" in this context what does that entail? Just daycare while parents are at work?
I think it means different things to different people, and also depends on the age of your child. I pay $10,500 per year for day care for my 1.5 year old, if i were to add in food, clothing, medical co-pays, toys, etc., the number would be far far higher.
04-04-2017 , 07:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
and at that age/developmental stage, she needs $6k/yr worth of music/tutoring lessons?
While at that age $6k/yr for lessons is out of the question. We spend more than +$20k/year on sports alone for 1 child. That didn't include travel expenses for the family to go to events scattered from Maine to Virginia and west to Ohio. It didn't help that he chose to participate in one of the most expensive sports .. ice hockey. I still wouldn't change it for the world, what he gained from that experience is priceless as are the memories.
04-04-2017 , 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
While at that age $6k/yr for lessons is out of the question. We spend more than +$20k/year on sports alone for 1 child. That didn't include travel expenses for the family to go to events scattered from Maine to Virginia and west to Ohio. It didn't help that he chose to participate in one of the most expensive sports .. ice hockey. I still wouldn't change it for the world, what he gained from that experience is priceless as are the memories.
This thinking drives me bonkers. If you can afford it, by all means, do it. It's great. But its pure luxury and was completely unnecessary.

There are like a bajillion ways you can give your kid just as valuable experiences/memories/life lessons w/o dropping 20 grand a year. Hockey is one of the most expensive sports around and I'd argue not even the best sport for actually teaching positive sportsmanship (and that's coming from a Canadian). There are lots of alternatives that cost way less than this.

And that's the point. It's not that people shouldn't spend this much money on things they want to have and do. It's that you shouldn't make the choice to spend this money and then think you have the right to ***** about being poor or about struggling or about anything else. And if some family is forced to sacrifice the $20k/year hockey experience for their kids in order to pay taxes for another family to get basic health care - I don't give a ****.
04-04-2017 , 09:51 AM
^nailed it

now let us lol @ the fact that bit about ice hockey was crafted in response to me asking a diff poster if their 1.5 year old child could use $6k/yr of music lessons
04-04-2017 , 09:56 AM
I don't know. Canadians have hockey and good health care.
04-04-2017 , 10:13 AM
Spending $20k/yr on a niche non-school funded sport for a child hardly qualifies as justification that $x amount of $$ is not enough. He could have just played soccer.
04-04-2017 , 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
I don't know. Canadians have hockey and good health care.
We're just better than you.

Edit: The vast majority of parents dread their kid wanting to play hockey.
04-04-2017 , 11:17 AM
New healthcare bill being unveiled today per Buzzfeed
04-04-2017 , 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevepra
That budget had 20k for each child. We paid an amount comparable to you. But, I do know some people who paid about 15k per child. That was just the going rate for daycare where they live. I don't think it's too crazy for 20k per child in the most expensive parts of the country, though I haven't researched it.
It's $1500 a month per kid in northern VA / DC for anything decent.
04-04-2017 , 12:35 PM
So whatever dumb crap they come up with, they still won't have enough Dems to crossover right?
04-04-2017 , 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
Not for nothing but it would be good if this whole line of thinking was abandoned. Food is not garbage and it's kinda disgustingly 1st-world privileged to say it is.


p.s. Sorry if that sounds too curt. I don't mean to be calling you out personally or anything.
I read his comment to mean that lower incomes and desertification lead to less healthy food 'choices' and consequently worse health outcomes. I think that's a reasonable statement. Not all food is equally good for you.
04-04-2017 , 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
It's $1500 a month per kid in northern VA / DC for anything decent.
Gonna skyrocket soon.

Quote:
Debbie James-Dean graduated from high school in 1979 and has spent much of her career working in child care. She was anxious when her director at Kids Are Us Learning Center in Southeast Washington told her she needed to go back to school.

“I was afraid I couldn’t do it,” she said. And earning $12.75 an hour, she couldn’t afford textbooks, let alone college tuition.

But she got a scholarship, and last summer she enrolled in her first college course: “Educating the Young Child.” She’s one of hundreds of child-care teachers in the District who must return to school under new licensing regulations that went into effect in December for child-care centers.

More than a decade after Washington, D.C., set out to create the most comprehensive public preschool system in the country, the city is directing its attention to overhauling the patchwork of programs that serve infants and toddlers.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...=.915101193d80
04-04-2017 , 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sportsjefe
Not related to you specifically but this is an interesting addition to the "do you need a degree for child care"?

Quote:
I don’t have a strong opinion on the question of whether child care workers should generally be more educated than they currently are. I know some countries (including Finland) do have various degree requirements for some child care workers. But I couldn’t say how necessary they are for things like child development and high-quality care.

However, even if you think child care workers shouldn’t be required to have a college degree, this particular argument offered by the Twitter critics is one that should be avoided.

Child care workers currently make some of the lowest wages in the country, $9.77 per hour and $20,320 per year at the median, according to the BLS. This level of compensation is unacceptably low and should be higher. After all, even moderate liberals support increasing the minimum wage to $12 per hour, implying a 23% increase in the median wages of child care workers.

To the extent that labor costs for child care make it hard for many families to afford child care, the appropriate response to that is child care subsidies. The labor costs of hiring teachers for K-12 would be intolerably high for many families to afford out of pocket. But we don’t respond to that by saying teachers should be hired without degrees and at very low wages. We respond to that by subsidizing the cost of K-12 education (to $0) so that families can afford it.

Because many families are headed by low-wage workers, you will never make child care affordable by holding down the wages of child care workers. No matter how low you hold them (assuming they are paid at least the minimum wage), there will always be a rather large swath of low-wage families who will not make enough to pay for child care out of their current income.
http://mattbruenig.com/2017/04/01/co...or-child-care/
04-04-2017 , 02:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
New healthcare bill being unveiled today per Buzzfeed
I wonder if this "new" healthcare bill will skyrocket from 17 percent public approval to an astounding 25 percent public approval?

I was listening to a discussion last night about Trump's Sunday afternoon golf outing with Rand Paul. Senator Paul made a comment to reporters that "progress was being made" or something along those lines. Mark Meadows, the leader of the Freedom Caucus, indicated that while no deal has been agreed to "in principle," discussions [with the Trump administration] are moving in the right direction. The commentators I was listening to pointed out that if Trump is moving closer to something that will be palatable to both Rand Paul and a majority of the Freedom Caucus, whatever that "deal" is will almost certainly be DOA once it gets to the Senate. (Unless it's a vote to repeal - and not replace - the Affordable Care Act, I doubt if this new bill will even make it out of the House, but what do I know?)

It must be true that Team Trump believes significant tax reform will be impossible without squeezing hundreds of billions of dollars of "savings" out of health care spending. One thing's for sure ... Trump won't let Paul Ryan schedule a House vote unless he knows they've got the votes to pass. A second (even more) humiliating defeat would be disaster for Trump. With all the tweets, threats, arm twisting and golf outings, Trump is buying this tar baby. He will own this one - he can't shuck it off on Paul Ryan if it fails a second time.
04-04-2017 , 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
In my neck of the woods, the trendy new drug is elephant tranquilizer. That's not a cool street name; it's literally elephant tranquilizer:

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.re.../idUSKCN11D09N
super scary stuff.

also, pretty sure the russians pumped this into the moscow theater when some terrorists took it over and half the ppl died.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow...hostage_crisis
04-04-2017 , 04:07 PM
The Russians apparently had antidotes that could have saved all those people - but they didn't want to admit to what gas they used.
04-04-2017 , 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
This thinking drives me bonkers. If you can afford it, by all means, do it. It's great. But its pure luxury and was completely unnecessary.

There are like a bajillion ways you can give your kid just as valuable experiences/memories/life lessons w/o dropping 20 grand a year. Hockey is one of the most expensive sports around and I'd argue not even the best sport for actually teaching positive sportsmanship (and that's coming from a Canadian). There are lots of alternatives that cost way less than this.

And that's the point. It's not that people shouldn't spend this much money on things they want to have and do. It's that you shouldn't make the choice to spend this money and then think you have the right to ***** about being poor or about struggling or about anything else. And if some family is forced to sacrifice the $20k/year hockey experience for their kids in order to pay taxes for another family to get basic health care - I don't give a ****.
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
^nailed it

now let us lol @ the fact that bit about ice hockey was crafted in response to me asking a diff poster if their 1.5 year old child could use $6k/yr of music lessons

Not a particularly important addition but it reminded me of how growing up, my sister did ice skating and horseback riding while I did basketball and boxing. To this day my sister can't truly grasp why our father 'supported' my pursuits more than hers.
04-04-2017 , 07:48 PM
I guess I could add that basketball is the greatest sport/physical game ever created and I'd tell all parents to encourage their children to play.
04-04-2017 , 07:49 PM
Also, apparently raradevils procreated so there goes my good mood.
04-04-2017 , 08:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
I guess I could add that basketball is the greatest sport/physical game ever created and I'd tell all parents to encourage their children to play.
imo hockey is like basketball but with more upper body work when battling for possession against others. I play in a street hockey league (so, running not skating, less expensive equipment-wise!) and it's a blast.
04-04-2017 , 09:11 PM
Knoxville, TN will be left without a provider in 2018 as last one declares plan to exit market

http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/04/news...are-tennessee/

This will be touted as SEE SEE WE TOLD YOU but THIS IS LITERALLY WHAT THE GODDAMN PUBLIC OPTION WAS FOR
04-04-2017 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
I guess I could add that basketball is the greatest sport/physical game ever created
No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
and I'd tell all parents to encourage their children to play.
Sure.

      
m