Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Great ObamaCare Debate, Part 237: Back to Court The Great ObamaCare Debate, Part 237: Back to Court

12-16-2018 , 01:37 AM
I disagree. I think people are close to ready. Especially if you can offer them a lower deductible. High deductibles may have been new and exotic in 2016. And they weren't all at $5k yet.

People need to go through the second half a year of putting off health care so they can cram it all into the next calendar year - before they actually understand high deductibles - imo.
12-16-2018 , 06:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy
Politically I think Dems should campaign on it. But if they want to pass something workable, it has to be something that GOP can sell as "market based" reform or some such BS.
Guys, grizy has solved it! If only the Democrats could come up with some sort of healthcare reform that was market-based, the Republicans would join in on the bipartisan effort to sell it to their base.

I wonder how this would work? Perhaps the government could create some sort of an exchange with minimal requirements as to the quality of the plans. Then health insurance companies could sell their plans there. Then the government could provide poor people with a little subsidy to help offset the costs.

Yes, that should do it. That's the market-based solution that the GOP will be happy to join in on selling as a bipartisan solution.

Now what will we call it? How about the Affordable Care Act? Either that, or we can let the GOP name it... I think they'd call that the Anti-American Socialized Death Panel Act.

Like, imagine being a human being who's been alive for at least the last 10 years, who pays enough attention to politics to post on a political forum and who thinks that the only thing stopping Democrats from getting Republican support on healthcare reform is not offering a market-based solution.
12-16-2018 , 07:25 AM
must admit i would ****ing hate the massive hassle of obamacare shenanigans. so much better to not have to worry about deductibles or individual mandates or any of that crap
12-16-2018 , 12:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hobbes9324
From an article by a Stanford psychiatrist that I thought was interesting -

1) Lower income smokers take longer and deeper drags on each cigarette than their remaining better-off counterparts. This strengthens their addiction (e.g., craving) and makes it more difficult to turn a resolution to quit into an enduring change.

2) Because income tends to segregate where people work and live, poor smokers often have to make quit-attempts alongside people who are continuing to smoke, but wealthier smokers usually do not. The last physician in a hospital who still smokes will face social disapproval from colleagues for smoking and receive social approval from those same individuals for quitting; the first worker on a roadside cleanup crew who tries to quit may face precisely the reverse social incentives from his smoking coworkers.

3) Although lower income people’s access to health care is being improved by the Affordable Care Act, they are still likely to lag middle class people in their access to effective smoking cessation treatments. They also may face challenges in accessing care for co-occurring mental health problems (e.g., depression) which make quitting smoking more difficult.

Anecdotally, the cigarette companies have also targeted their marketing to low income areas - which probably isn't helping.

Like most health issues, it's complicated.

MM MD
Interestingly the children's hospital I work at demands all staff - clinical and otherwise - be non smokers. Not that they refrain from smoking on hospital grounds, that they don't smoke at all ever! They screen for nicotine during their pre-hire drug screening lol
12-16-2018 , 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy
Politically I think Dems should campaign on it. But if they want to pass something workable, it has to be something that GOP can sell as "market based" reform or some such BS.
First off, you should caveat all of this with the fact that you personally want poor people to die. That's your moral principle re: health care policy. So every piece of advice you give us on how to prevent poors from dying should be taken with a grain of salt.

Secondly, by "something that GOP can sell as "market based" reform" do you mean ****ing Obamacare?
12-16-2018 , 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecriture d'adulte
Nah I don’t think the plans we have are any different. I was roped into the “Choosing healthcare plans for everybody” committee a couple years ago and I don’t think they had any plans with lower than 5k deductible for a family. I’ve never had problems with the out of pocket max though, like when my wife was pregnant, so I’ve been happy with it overall. Maybe my expectations were low but I always thought they would somehow get more than the max out of you.

But I disagree that people aren’t hyper sensitive about losing employer provided healthcare. I’ll be impressed if you can even get most Democrats on board. Colorado voted against a UHC plan that was 3% employee 6% employer payroll tax with no deductible 80% to 20% in 2016. I don’t think this forum has ever really bothered to understand how much work has to be done to get people on board with a semi realistic beyond slogan/talking points healthcare plan like that.
One way to start that conversation would be for you to honestly state your personal reasons for opposing UHC.

Again, if supporting UHC is so politically dangerous, it's a little weird that people who clearly oppose it are afraid to say so. We can repeat that process on the ****ing debate stage, guys!
12-16-2018 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
One way to start that conversation would be for you to honestly state your personal reasons for opposing UHC.
Idk about you but I always hear 'socialism' and 'bazillion dollars'.
12-16-2018 , 02:50 PM
Do you personally oppose it?
12-16-2018 , 02:58 PM
No? Just sharing my experiences to save you time as some twist on one or both of those things is guaranteed to be what you hear from anyone denouncing UHC, at least IMHO.
12-16-2018 , 03:08 PM
OK but like, that wasn't the question
12-16-2018 , 03:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
Guys, grizy has solved it! If only the Democrats could come up with some sort of healthcare reform that was market-based, the Republicans would join in on the bipartisan effort to sell it to their base.
The law passed and uninsured rates are way lower than prior to the law.

We got ways to go but we cannot just brush aside what ACA/Obamacare has done for the healthcare in the US. I believe it is an irreversible first step toward UHC in some form.

I even believe AC as it exists today, or at most with some minor modifications, is capable of achieving UHC (like 95+% coverage) within 10 years.
12-16-2018 , 03:57 PM
Huh let's check out literally a random grizy post about Obamcare from 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy
Liberals butt-hurt slowly coming to realization Obamacare doesn't do what they think it does.

Obamacare in its present form is going to worsen the healthcare cost crisis. Pumping the demand for healthcare way up without increasing supply is undoubtedly going to put even more pressure on costs to rise.

I personally believe UHC is inevitable because under the current system, we effectively subsidize healthcare research for rest of the world. To put this in perspective, the 5-7% of gdp we spend over most of the developed world on healthcare is more than what we spend on defense.

In an ideal world, a true world wide market place would be awesome. But we don't live in an ideal world. Everyone else is slapping price controls on healthcare, leaving USA holding the bag on R&D costs.*

Nash equilibrium can be a ***** sometimes.

*PS: you can make the same argument for defense as well.
Again, never forget that your politics and solely your politics make you a completely unserious person deserving of mockery, scorn, and worse. Shut the **** up
12-16-2018 , 04:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy
The law passed and uninsured rates are way lower than prior to the law.

We got ways to go but we cannot just brush aside what ACA/Obamacare has done for the healthcare in the US. I believe it is an irreversible first step toward UHC in some form.

I even believe AC as it exists today, or at most with some minor modifications, is capable of achieving UHC (like 95+% coverage) within 10 years.
You said the Dems should do a market-based solution because the GOP would support it. The Dems already DID a market-based solution and here's what the GOP has done:

1. Fight it tooth and nail.
2. Make up lies about it to fear-monger (death panels, socialist takeover, etc).
3. Attack it from every angle legislatively to repeal it.
4. Attack it in the courts.
5. Attack it with the executive branch.
6. Lie and claim to protect portions of it, while still fighting to repeal all of it by any means necessary.

So, show me the part where the GOP is selling their base/their donors/themselves on a market-based solution to healthcare.

The Republican Party has NO interest in any improvements to the healthcare system in America, and Democrats' strategy should be entirely based on what the best system is that they can propose that will help them get elected and that they can get passed. There should be zero consideration given to getting Republican politicians on board, or to what the Republicans will say about whatever they come up with... because whether they propose something market-based (like they already did) or true single payer, the GOP will call it a socialist takeover the likes of which the world has never seen which will lead to grandma getting death paneled and Obama and Hillary playing rock, paper scissors to see who gets to give her the lethal injection.

There will be never be any help from the Republican Party on this issue unless they've been so curb stomped in elections that the Democrats have the numbers to push single payer through on party lines, in which case they should tell the GOP to kindly **** off and enjoy their new healthcare.
12-16-2018 , 04:16 PM
It’s not just about GOP. It’s also about more moderate Dems.

The fact Obamacare is working undoubtedly contributed to McCain’s thumb down as well.

Obamacare (including Medicaid expansion part) also got some help from Republican governors. It is at least in part thanks to these governors that millions more got coverage... millions more that have accepted healthcare as a right thanks to Obamacare whether they like to admit it or not.
12-16-2018 , 05:11 PM
Grizy: Dems should try something market-based so Republicans will support it.
Me: They did that, Republicans said it was socialist death panels.
Grizy: Some Republican governors helped with the Medicaid expansion.

Me, now: Oh, you mean the great market-based healthcare phenomenon known as... Medicaid?
12-16-2018 , 06:40 PM
By helped he means "didn't always turn down, and also sometimes turned into worse-than-Medicaid-but-better-than-nothing corrupt public-private partnerships." It's like, man, you're describing the events of the relatively recent past here bro. You can't just make up **** like "GOP governors helped Obamacare" when you're describing the events of 2015 like people are just gonna nod their heads and say "oh yes grizy very good point and such a bright young boy".

Quote:
It is at least in part thanks to these governors that millions more got coverage... millions more that have accepted healthcare as a right thanks to Obamacare whether they like to admit it or not.
Is healthcare a right, grizy?
12-16-2018 , 08:18 PM
You're just arguing against some phantom position I don't actually possess.

I didn't say some "market based" position is how to convince the GOP. I cited it as a potential excuse for them to "sell" it, not even to support it. You need to give the GOP an excuse to just let the legislation pass AND you need them to actually administer the law on the state level and when it's their turn in Congress.

You're starting from a position that it's impossible to get any help at all from the GOP. In reality, if the GOP is 100% not helping at all, the laws just won't get administered in the deep red states, not without protracted court fights anyway.
12-16-2018 , 09:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
must admit i would ****ing hate the massive hassle of obamacare shenanigans. so much better to not have to worry about deductibles or individual mandates or any of that crap


Keep electing Tories you’ll get here eventually
12-16-2018 , 10:41 PM
Poor people smoke little cigars because they are cheaper.
12-17-2018 , 06:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy

You're starting from a position that it's impossible to get any help at all from the GOP.
Did you experience the last 20 years at all? This is the only reasonable assumption. Anything else is total fantasy land. You have to acknowledge reality before you can work to change it. The GOP are universally evil people who want poor people to die in the streets. That is a fact. We need to start from that assumption before we are able to fix anything. The can be no compromise, there are 0 moderate republicans who can be won over. We need to ride roughshod over them in the quest to improve people's lives.
12-17-2018 , 07:41 AM
lol grizy. concerned about "selling" the idea of UHC to republicans when anyone with half a brain knows we're working towards UHC in spite of republicans
12-17-2018 , 12:29 PM
Republicans want insurance companies to charge you as much as they like and cover as little and play all the fun preexisting coverages games they could before.

That's what they want. It's not what they say they want, but it's what what their actions indicate they want.
12-17-2018 , 12:41 PM
The bogleheads threads on Obamacare are hilarious. It’s a bunch of right wingers who pride themselves on being practical; this issue makes their heads explode from cognitive dissonance overload.
12-17-2018 , 12:48 PM
Obama to Republicans: Hey guys, good news, looks like the Blue Dogs are blocking public option - so we're gonna have to go with Romneycare as the ACA. This should make you happy right since it's your plan that you were still publicly expressing support for as late as 2015?

Republicans for the next 8 years:


grizy: come on guys, give compromise a chance.
12-17-2018 , 01:01 PM
That grizy post is just amazing. Like, there are no words.

      
m