Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The GOP war on voting The GOP war on voting

10-19-2017 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
Then you would vote at your old address Victor.
And if you moved across state? Welp, let me just take this three hour drive on a Tuesday to go vote.

People are saying you are the problem because YOU support the politicians who press for these restrictions. Care to take a guess at how many candidates I voted for in the last election that support a voter ID law?
10-19-2017 , 11:35 AM
Bump for you guys.
10-19-2017 , 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
You won't find me arguing for voter ID.
Sure, you'll just vote for the party that supports it and talk down to anyone who voices objections to it.
10-19-2017 , 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
I'm just asking you to compare and contrast the Ohio statue with the Wisconsin statue.
The Wisconsin one is worse.

That doesn't change the fact that the Ohio requirements are unreasonable.
10-19-2017 , 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Pretending that you are blameless because you don't argue for voter ID despite reliably voting for voter ID is pretty lol.
Take it to the voting thread. Thx bye.
10-19-2017 , 11:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999

And Victor then doesn't read the Ohio statues of voter ID which I think is miles better than Wisconsins.
no I read it and it is bull****. it would be very easy to be without those documents. funny that the letter from the voting office is not allowed but all other govt letters are. oh ya, maybe bc they dont send anything else.

the most common form of id is easy to not be sufficient. and it actually wasnt in your case. yet you still defend it.

the ohio rules for voter id are garbage and they make it quite hard to vote for millions of people. as evidence I showed how easy it would be for the most common document to be disallowed.

in response, you cried that I did not factor in all the random arcane documents on the list.

it doesnt work that way.
10-19-2017 , 11:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
Then you would vote at your old address Victor.

I am attacking you?

Asking you to "read the requirements" of the Ohio statue is attacking?

Posters in this thread "wish I would die." I'm just asking you to compare and contrast the Ohio statue with the Wisconsin statue.
I was not comparing it to wisconsin. my point, which was clearly stated, was that ohio voter id is garbage and makes it hard to vote. that it is less strict than wisconsin is of no consequence to me, or to my argument.

you are a valedictorian but this now the second time today that your reading comprehension has failed.

I am not interested in comparing it to wisconsin. I was interested in showing how it disenfranchises ppl. I would ask that you read my post and comprehend my arguments and either respond to them or ignore them. but I would ask that you do not create arguments that I did assert and ascribe those arguments to me and then attack me for those arguments that you created and I did not.
10-19-2017 , 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Pretending that you are blameless because you don't argue for voter ID despite reliably voting for voter ID is pretty lol.
and he is actually arguing for voter ID in this thread anyway. so its a complete joke and utterly insulting to every one of us.
10-19-2017 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
and he is actually arguing for voter ID in this thread anyway. so its a complete joke and utterly insulting to every one of us.
True.
10-19-2017 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
and he is actually arguing for voter ID in this thread anyway. so its a complete joke and utterly insulting to every one of us.
If you're talking about the posts from 2012, that was before I was turned away at the polls. Once it happens to you, you come to see the arguments on the other side.

I was wrong then. I will be wrong in the future, I am sure.
10-19-2017 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
Once it happens to you, you come to see the arguments on the other side.
Pretty much sums up the GOP.
10-19-2017 , 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
If you're talking about the posts from 2012, that was before I was turned away at the polls. Once it happens to you, you come to see the arguments on the other side.

I was wrong then. I will be wrong in the future, I am sure.
I hope you realize what you just said and maybe apply it to other areas as well.
10-19-2017 , 01:13 PM
its such a fool's errand to debate anyway, voter fraud literally does not exist and is not a problem. ever wonder why the handful of cases we've seen this year of people voting twice in november have been trumpkins? it's because nobody else is dumb enough to commit a crime and risk fines/prison in order to cast one extra meaningless vote
10-19-2017 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
If you're talking about the posts from 2012, that was before I was turned away at the polls. Once it happens to you, you come to see the arguments on the other side.

I was wrong then. I will be wrong in the future, I am sure.
no. I dont have any idea about your 2012 posts. I am talking about your posts right here today going hard defending ohio's voter id bs.
10-19-2017 , 01:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
If you're talking about the posts from 2012, that was before I was turned away at the polls. Once it happens to you, you come to see the arguments on the other side.

I was wrong then. I will be wrong in the future, I am sure.
The whole problem with Republicans and especially Trumpkins is not caring about what happens to other people or even being able to put your self in their shoes or even believing that someone you perceive as lower in status isn't full of **** and doesn't deserve whatever is happening to them.
10-19-2017 , 02:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
If you're talking about the posts from 2012, that was before I was turned away at the polls. Once it happens to you, you come to see the arguments on the other side.

I was wrong then. I will be wrong in the future, I am sure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
Pretty much sums up the GOP.
Yeah this is too ****ing perfect, only one of the two political parties in America consists of people that could possibly imagine situations outside their own life experience.

awval, you know how you say you agree with us now? Here's the shocker: we came to those beliefs without being personally turned away at the polls. We're smart enough to know that's a bad thing before it happens to us!
10-19-2017 , 02:39 PM
but he's lying, he isn't against voter ID laws because he's spending all his time itt defending ohio's. what he objects to is being inconvenienced, and he appreciates that ohio's law allows for a wide enough range of documents to not be burdensome on him
10-19-2017 , 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
If you're talking about the posts from 2012, that was before I was turned away at the polls. Once it happens to you, you come to see the arguments on the other side.

I was wrong then. I will be wrong in the future, I am sure.
Can we just apply this to gun violence, abortion, and the death penalty right now and get them outta the way?
10-19-2017 , 08:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
but he's lying, he isn't against voter ID laws because he's spending all his time itt defending ohio's. what he objects to is being inconvenienced, and he appreciates that ohio's law allows for a wide enough range of documents to not be burdensome on him
exactly. and he votes straight republican. so its the obv totally disingenuous. and he really thinks we are idiotic enough to believe it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Can we just apply this to gun violence, abortion, and the death penalty right now and get them outta the way?
at this point I think he has to be some next level type troll or maybe the loser of some weird. how could anyone who posts on this forum, and is a valedictorian, have the lack of self awareness to say something like that and be sincere.

he had to know that such self-absorption would totally trigger all the lolibs.
10-19-2017 , 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
I was wrong then. I will be wrong in the future, I am sure.
Needs to be rainbowed and c/p'ed in the main Presidency of Trump thread to almost all of awval's bad arguments.

Might be easier if it were just stickied, actually.
10-20-2017 , 01:53 AM
Im against voter id but vote for those who are for it as long as they pay me off. Or im for voter id and vote for people who are for it. Not sure what the difference really is in the end.
10-24-2017 , 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
If you're talking about the posts from 2012, that was before I was turned away at the polls. Once it happens to you, you come to see the arguments on the other side.

I was wrong then. I will be wrong in the future, I am sure
.
Jesus lol.

I can't even.
10-26-2017 , 01:45 PM
Unreal the unfettered chutzpah of these people

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/geo...tary-of-state/

Quote:
A computer server that was used to store key elections data in the state of Georgia was completely wiped earlier this year after voting rights advocates filed a suit against Republican Secretary of State Brian Kemp.

The Associated Press reports that the server’s data was destroyed this past July by unnamed technicians at the Center for Elections Systems at Kennesaw State University, which is responsible for running Georgia’s entire elections system. What’s more, two backup servers were also wiped completely clean in August, which was right around the time when a lawsuit against Kemp moved to federal court.
So a server plus not one but TWO backups were erased, and I'm betting literally not one single goddamn mother****ing thing will happen to this guy or the nerds who did the wiping.
10-26-2017 , 04:02 PM
APNewsBreak: Georgia election server wiped after suit filed

https://apnews.com/877ee1015f1c43f19...ter-suit-filed

Quote:
The server data could have revealed whether Georgia’s most recent elections were compromised by malicious hackers. The plaintiffs contend that the results of both last November’s election and a special June 20 congressional runoff— won by Kemp’s predecessor, Karen Handel — cannot be trusted.
They also wiped out the back ups.

hmm
10-26-2017 , 04:09 PM

      
m