Without mandatory ID he doesn't need to be in either state.

Close your eyes. Now imagine that Pablo is white.

OK lay out for me how exactly Paul is going to commit this voter fraud and what photo ID will do to stop it.

These laws have passed even in states with mandatory ID laws on the books and in effect. And you continue to be sorely mistaken about the state of voter identification laws prior to the ID restrictions being passed.

It's a very devious plan. Pablo is going to gather up all his closest friends with common names -- say, a million of them -- who will all do painstaking research to match each of them to someone in NC with the same name. On Election Day, he's going to commandeer a fleet of privaye jets to fly them all to Charlotte. Each one will have a normalizer from Men In Black to make their counterpart forget they'd ever been there and think he or she had already voted. From there, they'll fan out all over the state to find the person they're matched up with, hit them with the normalizer, then go down to the polling site and go to town on the ballot for the Dems. They'd round everyone up in time to fly back to Texas and take advantage of the time change to vote there.

But it all could have been avoided if there was mandatory photo ID.

Then I disagree with them if it's one state with mandatory ID to another state with mandatory ID. I did not think that was the case, though.

Ziz,

I'm not Reince Priebus. It is not my job to buttress the R party. I do see it as my obligation to propose things that would help the democratic process, imo. I don't agree much with either major party as constituted nor am I interested in defending either side. I haven't voted since 1972 because I believe it is pointless as the current parties are constructed.

I happen to like the US Constitution, but neither party cares much for it although they both pay lip service to it.

I believe in a democracy the vote is sacrosanct and should be restricted to citizens of voting age. Hell, I believe all citizens should be compelled to vote as we should get the government we deserve.

I hold a number of positions you might not agree with : compulsory national service, elementary and secondary school week 6 days, 11 months a year, "free" university education for those that meet the academic standards , etc.

But if the vote isn't as clean as possible, we've got nothing.

LOL @ you concocting some stupid story that was way tldr. This scenario just happened and it's pretty simple.

http://bloggingblue.com/2014/06/repu...ltiple-states/
A text message sent from Monroe’s phone on Aug. 4, 2011, urged a woman: “Election is next Tuesday! U better show up. If out of town go to city hall and vote early. Alberta Darling is name to check.”

OK, now explain how his 6 votes would have been stopped by these voter ID laws.

This leftist blog states this woman was instructed to show up to vote as another woman. I know leftists are wrong most of the time in their "facts" so this pajama boy might be making something up but I even quoted it for you above.

You, uhh, severely misread that article.

There's a shock

Hey, maybe you should google Alberta Darling before you jump to the conclusion that you've blown the lid off this whole voting scam thing.

Seriously, I don't think JAAASH has ever voted before.

show your work.

Well, at least on your second try you got the gender of the multiple voter correct.

Posts like this should be bannable.

From the thing you posted

All voter ID laws proposed so far do not fix this problem.

JAAASH is too stupid to even quote the part of the article that explains the voting fraud that took place.

My point is he wouldn't be able to do this with these new laws you leftists are complaining about now. He cast multiple ballots in person.

Yes he would. It would also be legal for him to send a text to a female acquaintance and urge her to vote for a candidate on the ballot.

Have you considered that it's not the pajama boys who are clueless here?

Urging her to vote a second time?

No surprise a leftist blogger got his facts wrong.

He was only urging her to vote once.

That's not what the blogger says which is why he cites that text message.