Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Globalist Party(D) and The Nationalist Party (R) The Globalist Party(D) and The Nationalist Party (R)

02-14-2017 , 09:52 PM
Most of you don't seem to understand that the old order has been completely destroyed by Trumpism and the Parties have realigned into the Globalist and Nationalist parties. You are now free to choose a new side.
02-14-2017 , 09:54 PM
If whoever made the STATISM gif with Beaker could make an updated version with (((GLOBALISTS))), it would be awesome.
02-14-2017 , 10:02 PM
The Old Republican Order said "more for the rich and less for everybody else." The New Nationalist Order says "more for American citizens and less for everybody else."

The Old Democratic Order said "more for the poor and less for the rich." The New Globalist Order says "more for the refugee and less for the American citizen."
02-14-2017 , 10:13 PM
LOL
02-14-2017 , 11:19 PM
wat in the wat
02-14-2017 , 11:38 PM
Lol
02-14-2017 , 11:57 PM
so i guess we know one more easily-duped trump voter
02-15-2017 , 12:07 AM
This is the guy who was into Hitler, right?
02-15-2017 , 12:15 AM
02-15-2017 , 12:18 AM
It's very simple, does letting in hundreds of thousands of refugees improve the standards of living for Americans or reduce them?
02-15-2017 , 12:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
This is the guy who was into Hitler, right?


I will link the thread for them after your pathetic attempts to virtue shame me. Let them judge for themselves if I am a Nazi. "Trump is Hitler LOL", you are like a screeching outraged leftist parody.


http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/34...69/?highlight=
02-15-2017 , 12:39 AM
go back to breitbart
02-15-2017 , 12:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
so i guess we know one more easily-duped trump voter

I didn't vote in the election, but I was so sure Clinton would win that I bet $476 to win $120 on America's Cardroom. My years reading this forum and reddit news and politics had me convinced that Trump was drawing neaarly dead. The only place I ever saw positive comments about Trump was in Yahoo news comments section which I dismissed as "lol baby boomers."


His win shocked me so much that I tried to figure out where the real mass psyche of the American public was at. Michael Moore was right when he said votes for Trump wasn't about racism, these working class people are the same ones that voted in Obama twice. I came to the conclusion that the current political atmosphere is about Nationalism versus Globalism.
02-15-2017 , 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Pulaski
go back to breitbart


I've honestly never read breitbart and didn't know about it until weeks before the election. I got my news from Reddit for the leftist view and read Yahoo comments to get a rightist view. I don't have a rooting interest for either side. I just thought you guys should be aware that the Parties are going to be perceived in a Globalist/Nationalist way from now on as opposed to the old Rich/Poor dynamic.
02-15-2017 , 12:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_C_Slater
The Old Republican Order said "more for the rich and less for everybody else." The New Nationalist Order says "more for American citizens and less for everybody else."

The Old Democratic Order said "more for the poor and less for the rich." The New Globalist Order says "more for the refugee and less for the American citizen."


I wish to clarify this isn't how it actually is, but this is the way it is going to be perceived by the general public. So please no more talk of how I am a Trump supporter.
02-15-2017 , 12:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_C_Slater
It's very simple, does letting in hundreds of thousands of refugees improve the standards of living for Americans or reduce them?
LOL at the bolded, but OECD says: improve
02-15-2017 , 01:05 AM
That study is about immigrants, I said refugees. Global warming is going to make the entire Middle East unlivable in the coming decades. Are you guys really so pathologically altruistic that you want to provide sanctuary to potentially tens of millions of Middle East refugees?
02-15-2017 , 01:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_C_Slater
It's very simple, does letting in hundreds of thousands of refugees improve the standards of living for Americans or reduce them?
massive improvement ainec

I guess you'd be fine living life without intel processors, but I wouldn't be
02-15-2017 , 01:17 AM
OMG, I am not talking about immigrants. An immigrant is someone that moves to a foreign country with conscious intent to live there permanently for economic opportunity. A refugee is a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.
02-15-2017 , 01:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_C_Slater
That study is about immigrants, I said refugees. Global warming is going to make the entire Middle East unlivable in the coming decades. Are you guys really so pathologically altruistic that you want to provide sanctuary to potentially tens of millions of Middle East refugees?
My bad, **** it then, let 'em die amirite?
02-15-2017 , 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_C_Slater
OMG, I am not talking about immigrants. An immigrant is someone that moves to a foreign country with conscious intent to live there permanently for economic opportunity. A refugee is a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.
I guess you don't know anything about one of the founders of Intel, and google is too hard for you, so here ya go, enjoy reading about this refugee:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Grove

Oh, and Steve Jobs' dad was a refugee. Do you think Apple has contributed to the country at all?
02-15-2017 , 01:30 AM
Apple has created a culture of mass narcissism as everyone stares into their igadgets updating their personal internet page and taking selfies. They have also allowed the CIA to realize their dream of having psychological profiles on everyone. The day will come when everyone will have their own personal room 101 waiting for them.
02-15-2017 , 01:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by miliboo
My bad, **** it then, let 'em die amirite?
At some point, when things get bad enough, a Nation must practice Lifeboat ethics.
02-15-2017 , 01:32 AM


Who needs Google, amirite? The country would be better off without the billions these tech companies bring in, and the massive advances their work brings to everyone around the globe!

The 3 companies I've mentioned brought the US something around a quarter of Russia's entire GDP just by themselves.

But something something lifeboats!
02-15-2017 , 01:40 AM
Google is one of many search engines, they just so happened to become the dominate one. We would still have Google efficient level search engines if Sergey Brin were never born. "Ten of millions of refugees from fanatical religious regions of the world are good because .0000001% might cofound a multi-billion dollar business!"

      
m