Ikes, only an complete drooling moron wouldn't understand what citations are.

Though since you've never used one here maybe that insult is too close to home.

There's no reason to be so hard on yourself low key. Citations are hard... And normally relate back to your actual claim. Unless, by many, you want to say a small minority of cases as described by this paper I found.

I mean, tile of thumb is always take the opposite side to Ikes but that cite reads like they want to use the loosest possible definitions to make it seem as bad as possible.

Are Asian women turning to porn and prostitution because they can make the average weeks wage in an afternoon, sure. This is, as I say, why defining many and sex slave is important however.

Figured you guys could at least make it through seven pages of one pdf. Not exactly huge amounts of homework.

I understand that you get off pretending to be something other than a clueless poster on an Internet forum, but there's a really large amount of porn out there. So even if it's only one percent, it would still constitute "many".

haha what's on the 7th page that I should give a **** about? Just copy paste it ffs.

Although, we both know you have ****. Gizmo is just trying to shame you out of your porn habit bro

Man, you and dibs get off on the weirdest things

Lol, but you were like "many pornos are made by sex slaves". Now you have gone full Ikes to the point we now are at ~1% of a all porn involves a loosely defined slave and also article talks about including editors etc as well as performers.

I read it, I stand by what I wrote about it, btw.

Makes it sound like you only read the first two paragraphs where they denoted the variety of possible definitions.

I can't find a percent or ratio anywhere. Because there's no good way to know. I saw an estimate that there's 420 million porn sites on the web at time of writing, and 1% of that is still a number I would call 'many'.

It could be higher than 1%, it could be lower. I was giving an example percentage to demonstrate that a small percent is still a lot of sex slaves.

GizmoKey has some serious porn hangups.

Damn bro, sorry...now you're #dudeliterally going to be called a rape apologist by Fly et al. for days on end.

This is what stupid branches of feminism actually believe.

Stupid branches of feminism believe governmental reports by agencies created to track a problem?

I guess thinking that's a bad thing is what stupid (read: all) branches of MRAs believe

We really need to post this again, bitter?

You got a response you're willing to share yet?

So no email?

DudeImBetter- Colleges do not, never have, and never will do play any role in rape investigations. Rape investigations are a matter for the criminal justice system.

Do you understand that? You literally have no idea what's going on. That's why RAINN didn't respond to your email, it's because it probably sounds like a crazy person wrote it. They did respond to drugsarebad, because he wrote like a normal person who knows what he's talking about.

You want colleges to be prohibited from disciplining students for an undefined set of code of conduct violations, including(but not limited to?) sexual assault. This is horrifying, and it is also transparently reversed engineered from your misogynist views on campus rape and the need to protect bros from an imaginary epidemic of getting the hammer dropped on them for innocuous conduct.

LOL I bet you thought that was like, the conventional wisdom before this thread. You thought everybody would agree with you.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...s-9592559.html

Been posted before itt, but this has some great quotes!

Well, we know that goofy and drugsarebad are satisfied.

^ Dibbles will be encouraged that he's not alone in the "has no idea what the difference is between private disciplinary hearings and criminal courts" section of the short bus! lol ikes.

Ikes up to reading four paragraphs in a link, nice! Quite the improvement!

Very sad day for men in that country. They'll actually have to make sure the women they stick their dicks in actually want their dicks stuck in them. The sheer horror of it all!

Nice reading comprehension. I have no idea how you got "private disciplinary hearing" out of that.

No one is going to buy that I don't know the difference between private and criminal proceedings goofy. I'm making fun of you and drugsarebad for your stupid ass take on how the preamble of the proposed constitutional amendment. This person is doing the same thing as that preamble, yet it's obviously a ludicrous position.

I wasn't sure if ikes was trying to link the NZ thing (criminal courts) to something we've said in this thread (about private disciplinary hearings), or the amendment thing.

Since it's the latter - lol ikes, still think that one's a winner for you, those egghead libruls who actually study the law are clueless, ikes' simplistic grade school arguments of "LOL that doesn't mean anything" are really gonna make him look like a smart person with an understanding of the world this time!

Keep ****ing that chicken.

btw, how far back would I have to go in your posts to find you cry about Fly assigning you views you don't hold, while probably adding something about how pathetic you're sure he is for resorting to doing so?

Hmm....

(But I'm sure this is different, because they really are the exact same thing! ikes has a real winner this time, you guys!)

so if dudeimbitter is no longer allowed to post itt (if that's the case, think i read that somewhere), can we post the email response he surely has received at some point - if he is willing to PM it to someone who can post itt?

It's exactly what you argued though goofy. Good try though

Goofy I knew egghead liberals, I've worked with egghead liberals, you are no egghead liberal. I'm not making fun of any expert. I'm making fun of you and drugsarebad