Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
Carlson should have absolutely been in the story.
Swift is not tangentially related at all. Your discussion of power dynamics is extremely male-centric and just flat out wrong.
The power relationship of an aspiring actress to Weinstein, a Fox News staffer to Ailes/O'Reilly, a young theatre kid to Spacey, a mid-level female comedian to Louis CK, a congressional staffer to Franken are all extremely similar. Those dudes all got away with that **** for years, sometimes decades, because they were important enough to be effectively beyond repercussions - until now.
Taylor Swift got groped by a creep (in 2013) and immediately told his bosses, got him fired, and then crushed him in court when he tried to sue her for loss of earnings. The women (and men) in the situations above did not have the ability to do this. That's all I mean. I don't in any way mean that because she has money and lawyers that what happened to her is not as bad, or anything like that.
If you mean that all of these situations including Swift's are rooted in a wider culture of misogyny and toxic masculinity that's designed to excuse men for ****ty behaviour and shame women out of speaking, then I agree with that obviously.
--
edit: okay I will also concede maybe I'm just biased because I don't like Taylor Swift, and don't think she's admirable in the way that the other women profiled are, and think that presenting yourself as a feminist role model while literally never having said a negative word about the rapist president (or the rapist presidential candidate) for the last two years is not cool.
Last edited by Kafja; 12-06-2017 at 02:39 PM.