Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Chaos and Carnage in Manchester Chaos and Carnage in Manchester

05-22-2017 , 09:20 PM
I wonder why he's getting a lot of notifications?

05-22-2017 , 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Ok you're probably right. sorry
Thank you.
05-22-2017 , 09:21 PM
Dude is just a colossal piece of **** and worthless human











And yes, he knew the basics of the scope of the attack from the beginning
05-22-2017 , 09:22 PM
The guys tweet started with "Multiple Confirmed Fatalities". I dont think he can claim that he didnt know the extent of the tragedy
05-22-2017 , 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plzd0nate
Seriously though, was there any reason for four pages of thinking up possible scenarios that didn't involve terrorism? Are you guys competing at who can look the most liberal by showing you aren't assuming it was terrorism?
Well, people in the attack were told by security that it was balloons popping and/or pyro backfire.

and british press is a lot slower to cry "terrorism!" than we are.
05-22-2017 , 09:24 PM
It was more than one tweet? Geez man.

--------------------------

It is fair to not jump to terrorism immediately as that declaration is pretty solid and hard to walk back. I mean even most news media outlets haven't made that declaration yet.

It's not liberalism. It's sensible.
05-22-2017 , 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plzd0nate
Seriously though, was there any reason for four pages of thinking up possible scenarios that didn't involve terrorism? Are you guys competing at who can look the most liberal by showing you aren't assuming it was terrorism?
a) 20 posts per page?

b) initial reports said balloon explosion and didn't give a number of dead

But yeah it looks like terrorism now. Libtards sure look stupid. Pop the champagne and spike the football. Terrorism still exists.
05-22-2017 , 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plzd0nate
Seriously though, was there any reason for four pages of thinking up possible scenarios that didn't involve terrorism? Are you guys competing at who can look the most liberal by showing you aren't assuming it was terrorism?
The reason for thinking it might not be terrorism is that in multiple instances stories like this have been reported and it has subsequently turned out to be terrorism.

This is nothing to do with being "liberal". It is to do with not being a dribbling redneck moron.
05-22-2017 , 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
The problem with gallows humor is that if you aren't actually funny you come off as a huge *******.

This story is horrifying. jfc
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66


Nice guy. Supposedly works for CBS and Yahoo!
Yep.
05-22-2017 , 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
a) 20 posts per page?

b) initial reports said balloon explosion and didn't give a number of dead

But yeah it looks like terrorism now. Libtards sure look stupid. Pop the champagne and spike the football. Terrorism still exists.
Not so fast - far as I know we can't yet confirm the perp was a brown guy. This could still potentially just be a mentally ill white guy for all we know.
05-22-2017 , 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by campfirewest
Yikes.
Still not deleted. Lol dude is done.
05-22-2017 , 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
Dude is just a colossal piece of **** and worthless human
Based on those tweets?

If you could give out 100 points of hatred today, how many would you give to the person or people who killed 19+ children and how many would you give David Leavitt? This is silly.
05-22-2017 , 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Love Sosa
a bunch of kids got blown up and you're worried about trumps speech...

priorities mate.
I thought about several things too, including Trump's speech. Some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time.
05-22-2017 , 09:29 PM
Comedians can't get away with making fun of dead children.
05-22-2017 , 09:30 PM
Heh

05-22-2017 , 09:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenC
Based on those tweets?

If you could give out 100 points of hatred today, how many would you give to the person or people who killed 19+ children and how many would you give David Leavitt? This is silly.
This post makes zero sense. So literally nothing anyone could do wrt to this incident short of causing it deserves any scorn or discussion?
05-22-2017 , 09:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
a) 20 posts per page?
25 ftw

Quote:
Seriously though, was there any reason for four pages of thinking up possible scenarios that didn't involve terrorism? Are you guys competing at who can look the most liberal by showing you aren't assuming it was terrorism?
Didn't your kind feel dumb when immediately thinking what happened in NYC a few days ago was terrorism....no hypocrisy there, at all.
05-22-2017 , 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
And now, the inevitable flip from snarky douchebag to insincere pearl-clutching.

You're in here making jokes about religion of peace. Which is much much worse.

Someone ban this ****ing clown.
Not going to lie, having people say stuff like "omg, what is Trump gonna say" and "this is great news for Trump and the media focus!" has made me really miss Obama. Obama wouldn't be the focus of so many people's attention.
05-22-2017 , 09:34 PM
So ****ing disgusting and depressing.
05-22-2017 , 09:35 PM
Gotta love being lectured about what is an isn't appropriate to discuss from the "religion of peace" snark crowd who also worship Cernovich. I'm sure this is appropriate because reasons.

05-22-2017 , 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenC
Based on those tweets?

If you could give out 100 points of hatred today, how many would you give to the person or people who killed 19+ children and how many would you give David Leavitt? This is silly.
Is this a serious post?
05-22-2017 , 09:36 PM
I don't mean to constantly be that guy teaching the olds how to internet but that dude's bio screamed "I don't actually work for Yahoo or CBS". People who work for a place, unless they are like editor in chief, would link to the actual sub-part they did. Like if he worked for a CBS affiliate, the twitter of that channel. If he ran a blog for their website, he'd link the blog.

People who work for a company use links to drive engagement and traffic to their work, they aren't interesting in people following the main Yahoo twitter. His bio was a freelancer's bio, him namedropping 3 corporate owners of smaller sites that probably paid him for like, street team promotional work or something.
05-22-2017 , 09:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plzd0nate
Seriously though, was there any reason for four pages of thinking up possible scenarios that didn't involve terrorism? Are you guys competing at who can look the most liberal by showing you aren't assuming it was terrorism?
Coulters law is now in effect

Quote:
Originally Posted by .isolated
25 ftw
100 posts per page. Anything less is for plebs.
05-22-2017 , 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Gotta love being lectured about what is an isn't appropriate to discuss from the "religion of peace" snark crowd who also worship Cernovich. I'm sure this is appropriate because reasons.

Does Cernovich even know where Manchester is?

Also:

05-22-2017 , 09:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizmo
Obama wouldn't be the focus of so many people's attention.
Of course because he was a reasonable, rational man who would act in a predictable manner when responding to this. We don't need to speculate.

Trump on the other hand...

      
m