Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Chaos and Carnage in Manchester Chaos and Carnage in Manchester

05-23-2017 , 08:16 AM
CNN saying ISIS claims responsibility for the attack.
05-23-2017 , 08:16 AM
You will hear lots of incorrect things about ISIS motives in the MSM some of it for noble but terribly misguided reasons and some of it just plain idiotic and cowardly.

The best way to know their motives is to go to the source and look at what ISIS says their motives are. The link below is from from Dabiq, the official ISIS state magazine. There is an article titled Why We Hate You and Why We Fight You. I can't think of a better source to learn ISIS motives.

It's important to note that this is the beliefs of ISIS and ISIS inspired terrorists and does not represent the views of the muslim community as a whole

http://clarionproject.org/factsheets...-the-cross.pdf

Quote:
Many Westerners, however, are already aware that
claiming the attacks of the mujahidin to be senseless
and questioning incessantly as to why we hate the
West and why we fight them is nothing more than
a political act and a propaganda tool. The politicians
will say it regardless of how much it stands in opposition
to facts and common sense just to garner as many
votes as they can for the next election cycle. The analysts
and journalists will say it in order to keep themselves
from becoming a target for saying something that the masses deem to be “politically incorrect.” The
apostate “imams” in the West will adhere to the same
tired cliché in order to avoid a backlash from the disbelieving
societies in which they’ve chosen to reside.
The point is, people know that it’s foolish, but they
keep repeating it regardless because they’re afraid of
the consequences of deviating from the script.
Quote:
1. We hate you, first and foremost, because you
are disbelievers; you reject the oneness of Allah –
whether you realize it or not – by making partners
for Him in worship, you blaspheme against Him,
claiming that He has a son, you fabricate lies against
His prophets and messengers, and you indulge in all
manner of devilish practices.
Quote:
Furthermore, just as your disbelief
is the primary reason we hate you, your disbelief
is the primary reason we fight you, as we have
been commanded to fight the disbelievers until they
submit to the authority of Islam, either by becoming
Muslims, or by paying jizyah – for those afforded this
option – and living in humiliation under the rule of
the Muslims. Thus, even if you were to stop fighting
us, your best-case scenario in a state of war would be
that we would suspend our attacks against you – if we
deemed it necessary – in order to focus on the closer
and more immediate threats, before eventually resuming
our campaigns against you.
Apart from the option
of a temporary truce, this is the only likely scenario
that would bring you fleeting respite from our attacks.
So in the end, you cannot bring an indefinite halt to
our war against you. At most, you could only delay it
temporarily. “And fight them until there is no fitnah
[paganism] and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah”
(Al-Baqarah 193).
Quote:
2. We hate you because your secular, liberal societies
permit the very things that Allah has prohibited
while banning many of the things He has permitted,
a matter that doesn’t concern you because you separate between religion and state, thereby granting
supreme authority to your whims and desires via the
legislators you vote into power
Quote:
3. In the case of the atheist fringe, we hate you
and wage war against you because you disbelieve in
the existence of your Lord and Creator
Quote:
4. We hate you for your
crimes against Islam and wage
war against you to punish you
for your transgressions against our religion.
Quote:
5. We hate you for your crimes against the Muslims;
your drones and fighter jets bomb, kill, and
maim our people around the world, and your puppets
in the usurped lands of the Muslims oppress, torture,
and wage war against anyone who calls to the truth.
Quote:
6. We hate you for invading our lands and fight
you to repel you and drive you out. As long as there
is an inch of territory left for us to reclaim, jihad will
continue to be a personal obligation on every single
Muslim.


I don't think you can get the truth from a better source or get it any clearer than that.
05-23-2017 , 08:16 AM
Fundamentally (npi) isis want to force a choice between being british (french american etc) and being a muslim. They want a world where you're one or the other and it's not conceivable to be both because they know that faced with that choice some people who otherwise would have zero beef with the society they inhabit are going to choose their religion. Thwarting isis means doing everything we can to avoid this false dichotomy.
05-23-2017 , 08:20 AM
Wouldn't it benefit ISIS to just claim every attack that is made public?
05-23-2017 , 08:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gin 'n Tonic
Wherever Islamic terrorism happens we should build a large statue of the prophet getting ****ed up the arse by a pig. A defiant memorial to our right to offend, our freedom of religion, and to be free of religion if we so choose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by superslug
Yea because that wont worsen religious tensions and alienate young impressionable Muslims.
If young Muslims are liable to become suicide bombers because of some harmless mockery then that tells you an awful lot about the religion we're dealing with.

Perhaps Trump's Muslim ban isn't such a bad idea?
05-23-2017 , 08:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
Wouldn't it benefit ISIS to just claim every attack that is made public?
I've often wondered if they're already doing that for the most part.
05-23-2017 , 08:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
Wouldn't it benefit ISIS to just claim every attack that is made public?
The claims have to credible to have an impact, if it would be revealed that a lot of the claims are false they become useless
05-23-2017 , 08:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gin 'n Tonic
Yes, because appeasement - which is what we're doing - is working so well.

The goal of the terrorist is a seat at the table - worked for the IRA, now working for Islamic extremism.
The whole point of the attacks is to attempt to exacerbate tensions in the communities targeted, this is not some unknown.

The more right wing extremist nationalist someone one is, the more the terrorists win, because they want war, they want boots on the ground in Muslim countries, they want non radical muslims being antagonised and discriminated against and thus radicalised.

The absolute last thing they want is dialogue, or a seat at the table, again this is a known. It is expressed time and time in their literature.

Part of cult of ISIS is that they are bringing about an end times apocalyptic war with the Infidels. They are absolutely distinct to the IRA and comparing them to the IRA is simple ignorance.
05-23-2017 , 08:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
I've often wondered if they're already doing that for the most part.
Just imagine how stupid they would look if they claimed the car driving over people in New York as an attack.
05-23-2017 , 08:26 AM
Quote:
Why the religious justify some kind of special dispensation under law not to be offended because they choose to base their entire lives on evidence that, frankly, wouldn't sell me a secondhand car is beyond me. We, the rational ones, should be allowed to call them out on their crass, ludicrous beliefs.

Lampooning Jesus, the prophet and God in general should be encouraged, not subject to the sanction of law if one crosses some arbitrary line.
Those laws are a proxy to go after truly hateful people. It's like getting al capone on tax avoidance, the restriction on "speech" is really a restriction on violence and incitement. Stay vigilant against the slippery slope for sure but I as a uk resident can publicly write on this message board that mohammed was a vicious warmonger who perpetrated great evil on those he subjugated and that believing in a god of any stripe is completely ludicrous. I have zero fear that anyone is going to arrest me or restrict my speech in any way.
05-23-2017 , 08:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.mmmKay
The claims have to credible to have an impact, if it would be revealed that a lot of the claims are false they become useless
The 2017 White House disagrees.
05-23-2017 , 08:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleCrumble
If young Muslims are liable to become suicide bombers because of some harmless mockery then that tells you an awful lot about the religion we're dealing with.

Perhaps Trump's Muslim ban isn't such a bad idea?
Why do you think this only happens to young Muslims?

A lot of the same mechanisms are at work when young Christians join Neo Nazi groups, they feel like they don't have a chance in society and the groups give them purpose
05-23-2017 , 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.mmmKay
Can you explain how building the statue will give better results?
It won't, it's a simple gesture of defiance and certainly counterproductive.

Yes, I know it's a crappy idea. Am angry today. Venting.
05-23-2017 , 08:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Those laws are a proxy to go after truly hateful people. It's like getting al capone on tax avoidance, the restriction on "speech" is really a restriction on violence and incitement. Stay vigilant against the slippery slope for sure but I as a uk resident can publicly write on this message board that mohammed was a vicious warmonger who perpetrated great evil on those he subjugated and that believing in a god of any stripe is completely ludicrous. I have zero fear that anyone is going to arrest me or restrict my speech in any way.
Walk that placard up and down the street outside a mosque and see how that works for you.
05-23-2017 , 08:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gin 'n Tonic
Walk that placard up and down the street outside a mosque and see how that works for you.
Why would I? That would be borderline incitement. Even so, I doubt anything would happen to me legally. I might get some grief from people but I find it highly unlikely that the law would intervene to stop me.
05-23-2017 , 08:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.mmmKay
The claims have to credible to have an impact, if it would be revealed that a lot of the claims are false they become useless

What impact does news that ISIS claims responsibility for a terrorist attack have?

1. Presents a common enemy and source of societal traumas.

???
05-23-2017 , 08:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Why would I? That would be borderline incitement. Even so, I doubt anything would happen to me legally. I might get some grief from people but I find it highly unlikely that the law would intervene to stop me.
Honestly I think they would - breach of the peace minimum once reported. And they'd probably be right, I think you get hauled off for your own safety.

What you get charged with (if anything) might be interesting.
05-23-2017 , 08:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
I've often wondered if they're already doing that for the most part.
I already assumed they were.

They just figure, "Well he did what we would have done. So he's one of us."
05-23-2017 , 08:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Why would I? That would be borderline incitement. Even so, I doubt anything would happen to me legally. I might get some grief from people but I find it highly unlikely that the law would intervene to stop me.
If you walked up and down certain pubs with a placard that made legitimate criticisms of certain football teams, you would get the **** kicked out of you.

Say critical things of Group X outside a cultural focal point of Group X get in a sticky situation is in no way exclusive to Mosques.
05-23-2017 , 09:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gin 'n Tonic
It won't, it's a simple gesture of defiance and certainly counterproductive.

Yes, I know it's a crappy idea. Am angry today. Venting.
What you should do is piss off half the world, maybe even start more violence and attacks, in order to feel slightly better.

Sometimes the 1st Amendment is a real ***** to deal with.
05-23-2017 , 09:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Fundamentally (npi) isis want to force a choice between being british (french american etc) and being a muslim. They want a world where you're one or the other and it's not conceivable to be both because they know that faced with that choice some people who otherwise would have zero beef with the society they inhabit are going to choose their religion. Thwarting isis means doing everything we can to avoid this false dichotomy.
Absolutely. And anything that drives a wedge between the Muslim community and the rest of us is a huge win for them. We must do everything we can to stop them achieving that.
05-23-2017 , 09:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
What impact does news that ISIS claims responsibility for a terrorist attack have?

1. Presents a common enemy and source of societal traumas.

???

The more big deadly attack they claim the more fear they create.

The entire purpose of terrorist organizations is doing attacks and letting everyone know you did it.
05-23-2017 , 09:39 AM
Quote:
What’s important to understand here is that although
some might argue that your foreign policies
are the extent of what drives our hatred, this particular
reason for hating you is secondary, hence the reason we addressed it at the end of the above list. The
fact is, even if you were to stop bombing us, imprisoning
us, torturing us, vilifying us, and usurping our
lands, we would continue to hate you because our primary
reason for hating you will not cease to exist until
you embrace Islam. Even if you were to pay jizyah
and live under the authority of Islam in humiliation,
we would continue to hate you. No doubt, we would
stop fighting you then as we would stop fighting any
disbelievers who enter into a covenant with us, but we
would not stop hating you.
It cannot get any clearer than that.

Also, it's pretty terrifying how good the propaganda is in that ISIS magazine.
05-23-2017 , 09:40 AM
If anyone's interested in the whole why the **** is this happening question these articles are good.
From Muhammed to isis

What Isis Actually Wants
05-23-2017 , 09:53 AM
In the end you might only stop it if you cut off their supply of manpower. But for that to happen you need to give them a life worth living. Educate them, feed them and let them have their fair share of wealth.
But we dont need to kid ourselves. There will always be people (mostly men) who feel they were left behind. Doesnt matter if they have to blame themselves or other reasons. They will always be vulnerable to be drawn into radical movements. At the end you can only do your best to minimize the number of these individuals.

Nowadays I ask myself: Why are we so attached to these victims? Yes they are kids which makes it even worse. Yet in 2015 5.9mil kids died who were youger than 5 years old. Newspapers will be full of cover stories for the next days yet so many people die each day, month or year and often its not their fault either.

Quote:
New estimates in “Levels and trends in child mortality report 2015,” released by UNICEF, WHO, the World Bank Group, and the Population Division of UNDESA, indicate that although the global progress has been substantial, 16 000 children under 5 still die every day. And the 53% drop in under-five mortality is not enough to meet the Millennium Development Goal of a two-thirds reduction between 1990 and 2015.

      
m