Quote:
Originally Posted by O.A.F.K.1.1
Communism as an ideology and communism in practise have a disconnect that is not apparent in National Socialism. NS sets out to be bastard from the offset and in communism it happens because of theoretical flaws.
One problem with classic Communist theory is that it has a very naive underdeveloped theory of power. Revolution and bang the State is gone. Hi dere one party state...huh?
This problem has been thought about a lot by communist theorists and more modern communist are totally aware of the legacy of communist failures.
Because unlike Nazi's communist's dont want to be bastard from the outset. To quote Marx, the ideal of communism is "Man transcendent in Man."
FWIW I am not a communist, I think there are better systems for reaching that ideal,
Einbert bless him is not really helping there cause.
so you would be ok with people saying that nazi ideas where very good in some cases but it was just a problem of implementation? like some1 saying that jews should have been deported to "jewloving countries" instead of being killed, that would be totally ok with you?
I don't see the disconnect between communist ideas and their implementation that you seem to imply here. They have been tried tens of times, and some results have happened the same way every time, and they were terrible.
Anyway the ideas itself in communism are atrocious. Eliminating private property is tantamount to eliminating sexual freedom, or most other freedoms in general.
So i guess the point here is that in this forum private property is not considered a basic human right? so it can be argued against it without censorship, while right of minorities are basic rights and it is not allowed to argue against them?
That could answer my original question.