Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Brexit Referendum Brexit Referendum

04-09-2019 , 12:06 PM
What Grizy said. EU wouldn't even talk until Art 50 invoked.

People were pissed off about the delay when that hadn't happened.
04-09-2019 , 12:08 PM
They can't check for rogue MEPs though, can they.

Ok, tell me who to vote for that will most annoy and disrupt the EU please? Oh, and as many remainers as possible, as a bonus. That's all I'm interested in now
04-09-2019 , 12:17 PM
The argument for delaying A50 is so the UK could get a clue before starting negotiations. Obviously the UK would have been in a stronger position if it got its house in order first.

If you stipulate that it could and / or would not get a plan then obviously the only sensible position is to never invoke A50. Voluntarily invoking the crisis point as fast as possible is idiotic. Even if the argument is that the government's hands were tied and they had to jump off a cliff, there's still no reason to pretend it was anything other than dumb.
04-09-2019 , 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
Nothing weakened her negotiating position quite like triggering Article 50 though.
She definitely triggered it without a plan, or a competent strategy for negotiations. She just went head first in listening to absolutely nobody else.
IMO that was pretty clear at the time as well. In comparison the EU had a highly motivated and competent team headed by the intelligent Barnier, it is no wonder she got taken to the cleaners.

If there is one single thing which significantly weakened our negotiating position though I would pick her acceptance of the EU's sequencing. Staggeringly stupid.
04-09-2019 , 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SootedPowa

If there is one single thing which significantly weakened our negotiating position though I would pick her acceptance of the EU's sequencing. Staggeringly stupid.
Yep. That was moronic
04-09-2019 , 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Maybe but increasing polarisation, name calling and unreasonableness enables the racism you say you oppose. And because i'm reasonable I accept that you do actually intend to oppose racism even though I think your approach is very much mistaken.

Whereas exclusivity and positive engagement does not enable racism. It opposes racism.
More nonsense

What?
04-09-2019 , 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diebitter
I quite like her and would prefer her to be leading labour than any other contender, but she really should lose her seat for this. This is clearly not about delivering a better brexit, it's about stopping brexit. She's a liar and a fraud if she says she wants to honour the ref result.
It doesn't make someone a liar and a fraud if they're preventing the worst of all possible Brexit options, even if it does happen to be the one you favour.
04-09-2019 , 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy
How so?

May couldn’t even get EU (and her own MPs) to talk without invoking. It was pretty clear everyone except May herself and the hardest Brexiters didn’t mind delaying as long as possible.
Because you end up putting yourself in a position where you lose all control without even knowing where you want to go and end up with the PMs if Ireland and other EU countries deciding the fate of your own whilst you simultaneously legitimise the dim-witted LOTO by having to try and act I coalition with him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by diebitter
What Grizy said. EU wouldn't even talk until Art 50 invoked.

People were pissed off about the delay when that hadn't happened.
The sort of people that are pissed off are the sort of people that voted leave and still think it is a good idea. They'll never be happy.

There is a reason the EU wouldn't talk - because once it was triggered, they held even more power.

It isn't a widely held belief but I think a skilful politician had a chance of engineering exit via treaty. We don't seem to have any of those, so you end up with what we have now.
04-09-2019 , 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Do remainers think everything will be fine if we overturn the result? I certainly don't, far from it.

Sadly I don't see an 'everything will be fine' option.
No, I certainly don't but if it means whichever government we have has to invest in the parts of the UK that the 90s/00s growth left behind so the likes of dibitter can feel a little less unloved, that'll be a very good thing.
04-09-2019 , 12:37 PM
Fortunately we'll be fine in Scotland if remain wins out.
04-09-2019 , 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
No, I certainly don't but if it means whichever government we have has to invest in the parts of the UK that the 90s/00s growth left behind so the likes of dibitter can feel a little less unloved, that'll be a very good thing.
Diebitter and his ilk will die bitter. There is no pleasing them.
04-09-2019 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
Diebitter and his ilk will die bitter. There is no pleasing them.
That's true, and I'm more interested in subduing the gammon thirst for revenge than I am pleasing those people, as opposed to many of the younger generation in parts of the country left behind by economic progress who do lead particularly bleak lives, and I hope things can be done to make them feel they have decent prospects.
04-09-2019 , 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
No, I certainly don't but if it means whichever government we have has to invest in the parts of the UK that the 90s/00s growth left behind so the likes of dibitter can feel a little less unloved, that'll be a very good thing.
Indeed we have to address the inequality across the UK which is only going to get worse without drastic action. It's a key part of healing the wounds. The housing catastrophe also has to be addressed as a matter of urgency.

This is nothing to do with people being unloved - that bit was worth you getting out your coloured crayons for.
04-09-2019 , 01:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by smacc25
Fortunately we'll be fine in Scotland if remain wins out.
On the surface of it that's true. Also for London.

But people vote and they vote for things that can hurt us bad like brexit. Even in scotland 38% voted leave - it's a massive block of potentially exploitable voters even if you had independence.
04-09-2019 , 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Indeed we have to address the inequality across the UK which is only going to get worse without drastic action. It's a key part of healing the wounds. The housing catastrophe also has to be addressed as a matter of urgency.

This is nothing to do with people being unloved - that bit was worth you getting out your coloured crayons for.
If my coloured crayons deter you from posting more of your terrible music that people grew out of when they were teenagers, they've served a purpose.
04-09-2019 , 01:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by smacc25
Brexiteer economist Andrew Lilico wrote on Twitter that he didn't believe the Queen should have given her Royal Assent to the Cooper-Letwin Bill.


The cross-party bill raced through the Commons in a single day last week and completed its journey through the Lords yesterday evening.

Mr Lilico said that the Monarchy "has demonstrated itself no longer fit for purpose", adding that the Queen "owed us a public statement and a reasoned explanation of why she backed Cooper-Letwin".

But James O'Brien said apportioning blame to the Queen was a sign that the "delusion is now completely next level".

I bet the Brexiters ITT are furious about those unelected officials. I can't wait to read their posts that must be coming any minute now.
04-09-2019 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
If my coloured crayons deter you from posting more of your terrible music that people grew out of when they were teenagers, they've served a purpose.
Best I can do for you on the crayon front

04-09-2019 , 02:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diebitter
They can't check for rogue MEPs though, can they.

Ok, tell me who to vote for that will most annoy and disrupt the EU please? Oh, and as many remainers as possible, as a bonus. That's all I'm interested in now
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis Cyphre
I bet the Brexiters ITT are furious about those unelected officials. I can't wait to read their posts that must be coming any minute now.
04-09-2019 , 02:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Indeed we have to address the inequality across the UK which is only going to get worse without drastic action. It's a key part of healing the wounds. The housing catastrophe also has to be addressed as a matter of urgency.
Can't be done if Brexit happens. Brexit will destroy the public finances and the public services, and is designed to do so. Liam Fox has stated out loud that, after Brexit (and the economic crash it will enforce) the NHS and even the schools will be sold to American corporations to run for profit. The British far right have always sought this outcome.

It is not true that Remain v Leave is an Elite v People matter. Most of England's big cities, and Scotland and Northern Ireland, voted heavily Remain. C2DE under-25s, the working-class young, voted heavily Remain, as did the young generally (and so did the generation old enough to remember the Second World War, because they know the price of not getting on with neighbours and the need of Britain to be part of Europe, the cause for which Britain fought the Napoleonic Wars and both World Wars, against dictators who would have shut us out).

Psephologically, the Leave vote was won by better-off pensioners (baby-boomers not old enough to remember the war) in the southern counties, not at all by the disadvantaged young in the north. It is a Corbynista / Faragiste lie to pretend otherwise.
04-09-2019 , 02:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
On the surface of it that's true. Also for London.

But people vote and they vote for things that can hurt us bad like brexit. Even in scotland 38% voted leave - it's a massive block of potentially exploitable voters even if you had independence.
Even the brexiters here can see how the EU has benifited our country, otoh if it was a independence vote, then we're in for some ****.

Nothing like a bit off civil unrest in your home country when the English don't get their way, ahh well its almost as if it was brought on by yourselfs by allowing the Torys to run riot the last 3/40 years with no responsibilitys or even respect for the country known as the United Kingdom.

I'm sure it won't be too bad though, until they take London.

04-09-2019 , 03:57 PM
Betty Boothroyd at the People's Vote rally today.

04-09-2019 , 04:15 PM
So, are we over with Brexit now, will never happen? Not even a new referendum?
04-09-2019 , 04:16 PM
Referendum is becoming more likely with the passing of time. Even some Tories are now publicly backing the idea, but there's a long way to go before they can even agree on the choices.
04-09-2019 , 04:21 PM
It may have to be a referendum, for psychological reasons. Would unite the UK and relieve the EU. The remainers vote as last time, and the brexiters can vote for remain, showing Farage and Boris they couldn't fool them forever.

For the record, the thing I for some reason remember best from the Brexit campaign was when Farage told who to do business with: "maybe even the Commonwealth". Then I knew he was as far off you possibly can be. The world is real, not a dream.

Last edited by plaaynde; 04-09-2019 at 04:31 PM.
04-09-2019 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
It may have to be a referendum, for psychological reasons. Would unite the UK and relieve the EU. The remainers vote as last time, and the brexiters can vote for remain, showing Farage and Boris they couldn't fool them forever.
If there's one thing politics has taught me over the past few years or so is that the opposite is the case when it comes to referendums.

      
m