The point of the FBI investigation is the same as any accusation that could come down to he said she said. It is to scrutinize the story of the accused and see if their story matches other facts. Especially in this case, she needs some kind of protection from random alibies, attacks on her and lies. They may not be able to "prove" he did what she said, but they can prove his story doesn't match Judge's, other people who were there, or at least can disprove the bull**** doppelganger defense etc. An investigation into surrounding facts goes a ways toward getting this guy to either tell the truth, lie under oath directly or by omission in either a provable way or a fairly easy to spot way if he did it and actually remembers he did it.

Good lord. I mean would there ever be any point in investigating or cross-examining a witness in cases lacking physical evidence if a denial was the end of the story? Make him explain himself, answer questions, and see if his explanations are consistent with or contradict the known facts (that will be uncovered in an investigation) or not.

This goes to his credibility to be on the SCOTUS, the burden is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

What the republicans did to Garland was underhanded. He at least deserved to get a vote. This doesn't excuse what Feinstein did in this situation. Four year olds say, "well he did this" to excuse their misdeeds. Its like the lefties in this forum never matured beyond kindergarten.

https://twitter.com/michelleinbklyn/...59458700443648

It is the bully who punches you in the head every day getting angry when you graze them throwing up your hands to block the blow.

So much this (no offense to the poster above me).

OK cool, bitches be lying. Got it.

No doubt all these Republican actions have also forestalled you in supporting them.

ban simulated for bad faith posting, please. thanks.

Mark Judge was the other person in the room. Republicans have no intention of calling him to testify.

why do you call women "bitches"?

An uncoloborated accusation is not enough to derail a nominee != "Ok cool, bitches be lying".

What you did was straw man. I have observed you do that quite a lot.

It is pretty obvious from his posting simulated is the only one itt who didnt know who Mark Judge was. It's very telling the posts he refuses to respond to as well, not an indication of bad faith posting at all!

I still like how he weirdly spells random words wrong, it keeps me on edge while reading that garbage.

It's also hilarious the two bad faith trolls are going with the "didnt happen" line. The PR firm hired by Kavanaugh didnt even try this! They spent a whole week trying to pin it on the "look alike!"

The have no intention of having him testify before the committee because when they did question him, they deemed he had no useful information to provide. How do you provide testimony to an event that you believe never happened?

To believe Ford's accusation isn't being investigated is dumb. Its been investigated and being investigated by all kinds of people. Some are looking for ways to exonerate Kav and others are looking for ways to hang him.

So far, there has not been any evidence found to corroborate the story Ford is telling today.

What are you talking about? I have 44 posts in 24 hours. Most of them responses to other posts.

Not sure if this has been posted yet, but Ford has agreed to testify.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/22/u...d-testify.html

In that case wouldn't it be helpful to the republican's cause for them to just have him formally testify to the fact that it didn't happen? Makes Kavanaugh's denial look even better, right? Why do you think they aren't doing this?

guys, guys! the repubs checked it out. nothingburger.

I know what he's talking about and so do you. You should be banned for pretending not to.

Let the FBI confirm it.

Yeah, impossibly calculated or.....true.

WTF happened to this thread?

FYI 100% of new posters that beeline to politics and post like that get banned in pretty short order. But I imagine you already know that.

Oh, you're asking about corroborating Ford's claim. I mean we can start with the Senate Judiciary Committee asking Mark Judge under oath, right? Or even better, have the FBI ask him.

Lol @ two September join dates AIDSing up the thread. It's hilarious to watch these guys complain about how easy it would be for a random lib to make a public sexual assault accusation that will enrage the most powerful people in the country and their tens of millions of bloodthirsty supporters, while they are too scared to post their opinions on their real, already anonymous TwoPlusTwo accounts.

I would add "turning up the music" to drown out her message.