Love this.

If Namath is correct, we may both need reading lessons.

Chiefsplanet in full-on projection mode.

People like jj and inso0 do not think powerful men should be held accountable. They also do not think he testimony of a woman is credible evidence. These are people who can not he redeemed. They have thousands of posts and if you can find one with humanity or compassion, good luck.

Nobody here thinks they can stall until 2020! The public at large doesnt want that. Kavanaugh had a ~33% public approval rating before yesterday. He is deeply unpopular. He is a liar. He is a judge cut from the cloth of Hannity. He is deeply unqualified. You can have another deplorable judge. You can get one quite easily. Just jump ship on this dude. He's a terrible person who openly makes his female clerks dress in a revealing way.

Other way around. I think he had other bets though.

oh, no I won $500 on a side bet here

but I was referring to PredictIt

I was fairly massively betting against him being confirmed, and I bet against him even more when Flake came out as a Yes (Kav hit 87% to be confirmed, he's down to about 65% at the moment).

gg, altho the way this has been going I feel like I still have a shot lol

"But what about Hillary!" Deplorables gonna deplorable. **** off Inso.

This guy is being interviewed for a job. He's not on trial. Again, **** off. Go whine some more about Hillary.

You let lefto-whackos post **** like this while nit-picking my post?


My God, what is wrong with you?

Anyways the only piece of physical evidence that was presented at the hearing from the time period of the alleged rape attempt was Kavanaugh's calendar. The calendar is exculpatory evidence meaning it is favorable to the defense; it corroborates his testimony.

Had Ford came to the hearing with a diary that said "Brett tried to rape me tonight". It wouldn't prove Kavanaugh tried to rape her as she could have been referring to another kid named Brett but it still would have corroborated her story. Brett would not be the nominee now if such evidence existed. Corroboration does not mean "proof" like it seems your think it does. The calendar gives us evidence of what Brett was doing in the summer of 1982 and it suggests he was not out trying to rape little girls.

Other than testimony and the physical evidence of the calendar, what evidence presented at the hearing corroborated Ford's account? Zippo. The physical evidence favored Kavanaugh period.

BTW, it was "4chan hoax and her attorney"

Avaneeti tweeted something outrageous that was claimed to be the words of some kids that punk him. That outrageous definition was not in his client's affidavit. Has he since provided any evidence where he got the definition from?

You mean the calendar that explicitly has a drinking event involving numerous named parties in the accusation right on it, exactly in the right time the accusation said it took place?

More dishonesty and disingenuity. For one thing, Professor Ford has notes from therapy sessions in 2012 where she described the attack. Calling the calendar exculpatory is extremely weak.

Yes. It supports his defense more than it supports her accusation. Its exculpatory evidence. Ford provided no inculpatory evidence from the time period.

But why do you let people post threats against public officials and then go on to nit pick my posts? Thats just sick.

You are absolutely live here

2012 is not the time period of the rape. The physical evidence we have from the time period supports Kavanaugh.

That calendar entry is entirely consistent with her telling! That would make it inculpatory.

Giving that law dictionary a workout today huh

No, it doesn't. Also, do you see anyone running around proclaiming victory of physical evidence from 2012 contest? No, because that's stupid. Just like your post is stupid.

Not with the right number of people or girls or the right location. And the July 1 entry, assuming that is the one you are referring to, is one of numerous entries that also do not correspond with the correct people or home. And how exactly do you know it was "exactly in the right time" when Ford does not even know that?

I'm still absolutely shocked that July 1, 1982 wasn't brought up by anyone after special counsel asked about it and got immediately canned

You guys trying to argue logic and facts with someone who clearly doesn't give a ****.

I will be vigilant to protect the independence and integrity of the Supreme Court, and I will work to ensure that it upholds the rule of law and safeguards those liberties that make this land one of endless possibilities for all Americans.

sigh, I'll mention this one even tho I shouldn't.

She mentioned seeing Judge at work 6-8 weeks later (something like this I didn't look up exact quote) which actually lines up correctly with Judge working at that safeway (I think she said that was the workplace) if that's the date in question.

Same. Or a dozen other things that could (should) have sunk him but have nothing to do with rape. Some gross incompetence on the part of Ds on that committee.

From Georgetown Prep to Safeway? This Judge kid is going places