Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Brett Kavanaugh - Interest & Discussion Brett Kavanaugh - Interest & Discussion

09-26-2018 , 11:35 AM
Cue the GOP talking point machine: the 80s were a different time, Quaaludes were in vogue, what boy didn't drug and rape his high school classmates, have you ever seen Revenge of the Nerds
09-26-2018 , 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
but PGUK is certainly trying his damnedest, again

go watch another ****ing boxing match that nobody cares about and let the adults talk politics itt pls
Simmer down. PGUK's post reads like not wanting to believe the world is as terrible as it is rather than rape apologetics.
09-26-2018 , 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
It feels ****ing terrible to have to explain this to you: how is she supposed to know who raped her when she's DRUGGED AND UNCONSCIOUS?

Furthermore, if there are the same dudes around always doing this **** who are friends, what are the chances they committed the rapes? I'll answer for you: PRETTY ****ING HIGH
Aventti did a good job with the affidavit, as she has the ability to provide additional details without contradicting her own words. It does not say she was unconscious, she claims to have been incapacitated and unable to fight off the attackers. She does not specifically claim Kav raped her. She did not specifically name her attackers, her witnesses or the other victims or boys she saw the same thing happen to. There is still plenty of canvas to paint in oral testimony.
09-26-2018 , 11:36 AM
i'm only going to chill out once this dumb mother****er stops throwing shade for absolutely no reason on every single accusation against kavanaugh, including the latest sworn deposition from a govt employee with numerous security clearances

like for real ive about had enough

you got a specific concern about her integrity or her claims? then present it, or shut the **** up because twisting yourself up to furrow an eyebrow at every accuser is decidedly not a good ****ing look
09-26-2018 , 11:38 AM
Avenatti proved the doubters (including myself) wrong. This woman seems 100% legit and she is very brave for coming forward given all the wackos out there.

Kavanaugh being basically an all-around terrible person, at least in his younger days, is not really up for dispute at this point.
09-26-2018 , 11:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PartyGirlUK
Her point, number 13 says Kavanaugh was 'present' when she was drugged and gang raped. Not that he took part. Which is something I should have pointed out rather than claiming her story was 'a little bit off'. I got it wrong and apologise.
Her statement directly states she saw Judge and Kavanaugh lining up to participate in gang rapes.
09-26-2018 , 11:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
i'm only going to chill out once this dumb mother****er stops throwing shade for absolutely no reason on every single accusation against kavanaugh, including the latest sworn deposition from a govt employee with numerous security clearances

like for real ive about had enough
Try to imagine it's a pit bull being accused. Gotta make sure the story lines up.

I'll show myself out now.
09-26-2018 , 11:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PartyGirlUK
Something about the Swetnick story is a little bit off imo (edit: first instinct. Perhaps shouldn't have posted. Could be wrong!)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PartyGirlUK
Her story re. the allegation is not remotely convincing.

More like PARTYPOOPERGIRLUK AMIRITE
09-26-2018 , 11:40 AM


we need a second Mount Rushmore (think Mount Rushmore 2.0) with the following people etched in stone: Heyer, Avenatti, John Lewis, and Jackie Robinson.

09-26-2018 , 11:41 AM
King backtracked if I remember correctly or am I mixing it up?
09-26-2018 , 11:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
More like PARTYPOOPERGIRLUK AMIRITE


DEBBIE DOUBTER
09-26-2018 , 11:42 AM
Avenatti’s cool and all, but the victims are the real heroes here.
09-26-2018 , 11:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Simmer down. PGUK's post reads like not wanting to believe the world is as terrible as it is rather than rape apologetics.
Yeah that's the way I read it too, just giving her ****.

Meanwhile, yeah, "WTF were you doing going to rape parties, girl?!?" is gonna come up. But OTOH, Kavs cast himself as a complete choir boy in that Fox interview, it's pretty clear that even if he wasn't doing the raping he mysteriously and repeatedly found himself in close proximity to rape which is the opposite of the picture of himself he and his handlers have painted.
09-26-2018 , 11:45 AM
LOCK HIM UP!





Ted Lieu 20220
09-26-2018 , 11:45 AM
I still can't fist pump yet, this still sucks. Having a 5-4 majority on the scotus for decades to come is worth blowing everything up (losing both houses) for the right. They can just win back a chamber in the future. And the unfortuntate thing is that this might torpedo this asshat of a nomination, but even if dems take back the senate, they'll just confirm someone else during lame duck. That someone will most likely be MORE conservative.
09-26-2018 , 11:45 AM
Regardless of the hearing or what Rs do on Kavanaugh's nomination, Swetnick's charges seem like something that have to be investigated by local law enforcement. It came up earlier that there is no statute of limitation on rape in Maryland.
09-26-2018 , 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
LOCK HIM UP!





Ted Lieu 20220
Not Born in the USA#1 though. I wonder if he could still be Speaker? He would be my top choice for that job ainec.
09-26-2018 , 11:49 AM
I assume all the PGUK defenders haven't been reading his work itt. Otherwise, you should be ashamed of yourselves. +rep is 100% right.

Last edited by .Alex.; 09-26-2018 at 11:54 AM. Reason: The Avenatti cynics are even worse
09-26-2018 , 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunyonAve
I still can't fist pump yet, this still sucks. Having a 5-4 majority on the scotus for decades to come is worth blowing everything up (losing both houses) for the right. They can just win back a chamber in the future. And the unfortuntate thing is that this might torpedo this asshat of a nomination, but even if dems take back the senate, they'll just confirm someone else during lame duck. That someone will most likely be MORE conservative.
lol im sorry but like, "more conservative"?

you are seriously ****ing delusional if you think that kavanaugh would rule any differently/more liberally on any hot button issue/case than any of these other federalist society approved pieces of ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
Not Born in the USA#1 though. I wonder if he could still be Speaker? He would be my top choice for that job ainec.
i support ted lieu's bid to run for anything, including king of the world
09-26-2018 , 11:57 AM
09-26-2018 , 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Avenatti’s cool and all, but the victims are the real heroes here.
Yep. Not sure why Avenatti gets credit for this woman being willing to come forward. She is the story, not him.

And FWIW, I'm not loving the way the affidavit was written quite as much as some people are.
09-26-2018 , 11:59 AM
Fine, you're right, there's nobody that's going to vote any different.

Unfortunately, we end up in the same place that we're still going to lose scotus and have a 5-4 court for decades to come unless Dems nut up and do something outside of the normal playbook, which they've shown no desire to ever entertain. They're going to win both houses back and then say it's time to return to "normal order".
09-26-2018 , 11:59 AM


alright, whoever said this would actually matter, props to you
09-26-2018 , 12:00 PM
Guess we’re never going to get to the bottom of the baseball ticket thing.
09-26-2018 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
lol im sorry but like, "more conservative"?

you are seriously ****ing delusional if you think that kavanaugh would rule any differently/more liberally on any hot button issue/case than any of these other federalist society approved pieces of ****
I think it could always be worse. For example, Robert Bork would have been strictly worse than basically anyone who has been confirmed since him. The problem is we're not allowed to even know about a judge's judicial philosophy beyond their rulings because the nominating party keeps us as in-the-dark as possible, as they've done here with Kavanaugh. You're correct that whomever they run out there after Kavanaugh will rule similarly on similar cases, though, so I'd prefer a non-rapist.

      
m