Like the Republicans GAF what Jeff Flake thinks or says at this point. Trump was probably on the phone watching Fox News with Sheriff Joe while complaining about these lying bitches and got a recommendation that way

She's kind of a mid management prosecutor in Phoenix.
Only articles I could find on her are:
1. She prosecuted a cop for inappropriate conduct... and basically let the cop go with a promise to never try be a cop again.
2. She prosecuted a pedophile priest

She was a nominee for a judge position, listed as a Republican.
She seems to have written occasionally on sex abuse of children

Legalspan entry on her looks like this:
http://www.legalspan.com/catalog2/fa...9-272095-72044

https://www.maricopacountyattorney.o...ssage?id=42796

This is a page where she got an aware for NACo award for Sex Assault Backlog.

Here's a picture of her and her group. I think the lady in the middle is her since she's listed as SVU Director in the caption.



The award is for instituting a program that had "almost 2,000 kits sent for testing" when there was a backlog of 4,000. But whatever. It's a good step forward.

Here is the part that I thought "now I get it."

**** yourself GOP. The search process seemed to be
<filter for woman>
<filter for sex crime prosecutor>
<sort by charges files and convictions, lowest to highest>

So what are we going to call the dynamic duo of Gorsuch and Kavanaugh for the next 40 years? Gorvanaugh or Kavasuch? Robin and Robin?

This for sure needs to be in colors.

Welp

Thread needs to be locked for lack of interest and discussion.

It's ruining his life.

It's just a job interview, this isn't a court of law ffs. OH NO HE"LL HAVE TO GO BACK TO HIS OLD JOB OF BEING A VERY HIGH CONNECTED JUDGE IN DC THE HORROR.

Not to mention old turtle neck essentially calling her a liar before any hearing has taken place. Having Feinstein coming off worse than Mitch here is ****ing astonishing

eh, I think the general public is gonna think the same thing that Feinstein came off the worst. I don't know how either but it just seems like something this country would do.

I don’t think more than 50% of the general public could even tell you who Feinstein is, let alone their opinion of her recent actions

Go to hell Graham.

Ford's more than credible and you know it.

fair, but I think if we let it generalize it to dem/rep there's a lot of people barely paying attention that aren't happy with the dems at all for this. Probably something close to actual D/R lines though but man this **** show. There's too many people who just don't give a **** about anything but themselves.

Ole Linds been touching on some boys has he?

She can offer the letter however and whenever she ****ing feels like it. It's not that hard to understand actually.

Theory: Kavanaugh doesnt have the votes now
They're scheduling the vote for Friday as a semi bluff but are just waiting to see how the questioning goes.
Decent chance they pull him before she testifies still.

Stopped reading there. lol, **** this ****.

I've been reading a history of the Anita Hill case. Never really paid enough attention to it when it was going down. Never realized how hilariously unqualified Thomas was. Just an enormous slap in the face to the great Thurgood Marshall.

loldomer still ****ting out talking points that even the GOP abandoned. Guess he got tired of lying about climate change and has switched gears to carrying water for a sexual predator.

Thought so too given he went on Fox. That said, there's 43 R's confirmed even if he's a serial killer already and it's impossible to trust any of them on the list who isn't confirmed lock yet.

It's not a bluff though, if it's close McConnell is gonna have a vote since he did on that healthcare repeal bill.

Trump ain't pulling **** unless he absolutely has to as he loves this **** show. Hell he probably dgaf if they don't vote him in so he can whine about democrats more.

50% is closer to her name recognition in California than it is to her national name recognition, which is probably around 15%, and only that high because she's a longtime Senator in the nation's largest state.

James Lankford or Jon Tester's national name recognition is probably well under 5%.

RE-EDIT: Related:

https://www.politico.com/story/2015/...enators-114867

Hot take: if Kavanaugh gets confirmed and Trump's approval continues to tank, the Dems could absolutely get away with having packing the SC in their 2020 platform.

The voting public could easily be convinced:

1. The last 2 SC Justices are illegitimate

2. In general, were in a climate where political norms are flying out the window

3. Republicans suck (remember this scenario is predicated on Trump continuing to be historically unpopular)

It's a pretty great opportunity. They'll never do this because they suck, but they should.

They gotta be worried about Avenatti too. He said earlier his client is going public within 24-36 hours. And that person apparently has multiple security clearances.

Dude, they're literally campaigning on reinstating the fillibuster.

, which the Meyer-Farrow article soooo heavily alluded to.

In fact, my only criticism is that the article's coyness is too obviously a trap, yet and still these deplorable jokers stick their paws right in the honeypot.

republicans knew at least as long as feinstein. thats how they came up with the 65 names.

regardless, its not the dems fault the republicans are trying to slam thru a drunkard rapist.