Didn't think about this angle but it makes so much sense.

Oh for sure. No argument here. Reread my last sentence.

Comments re GOP special assistant from local lawyer.




https://twitter.com/bmaz/status/1044777481260085248
https://twitter.com/bmaz/status/1044770015021420544
https://twitter.com/bmaz/status/1044760769622028288

If Avenatti actually has something, he needs to get it out now.

He's addressed that on Twitter. Says he's waiting for his client to give him the go ahead basically.

He said, yesterday, his client would go public within 48 hours. Tick tock mother****er

If I were Avenatti, I’d pile on right after Ford’s hearing.

After watching Ms Fords courageous actions today, my client has decided to come forward.

As unqualified as he was, he has turned in even a worse execution. He is horrible.

Mark Judge is the Kato Kaelin for a new generation.

domer doesn't agree, fundamentally

If Kato’s last name was Innocent.

Watch out, it looks like there's a woman from Kavanaugh's past who's accusing him of some #MeToo stuff. Could get interesting.

Keep on writing stuff like this and microbet might suspect that you are a secret advocate for dystopia.

You guys are straight high on pcp if you think Avenatti has anything except self promotion to lend to the current three ring circus

Holy **** that is funny. Who is running this account? I legit loled and snorted.

I probably didn’t express myself clearly. I don’t know what Avenatti will bring and if he will bring anything. His allegation teasers are pretty annoying, but he probably uses them for a purpose.

My point was that people who believe that the other two claims (Ramirez and Ford) are false, probably believe that’s it’s easy to plant a false claim. But that’s not how real life works.

Clinton WAS LIKELY A RAPIST.....yet he was a competent president. That shows us that putting a likely sexual predator into high office isn't a necessarily catastrophic error. Still, nobody wants a sexual predator in high office. So the argument goes that it is better to reject the Kavanaugh just in case he is a sexual predator.

This a bad argument because in rejecting Kavanaugh for the purpose of avoiding one error, you could be making an even worse error. Now I came into this thread arguing there is a "by any means necessary", "do what ever it takes", "no Trump", "At all cost" movement in the left which could be purposely smearing Kavanaugh. Given the scant evidence to back the accusations against Kavanaugh it is a real possibility these accusers are outright lying, or are simply being used as tools of left winged whack jobs. The accusations are so nebulous, and uncorroborated that to reject Kavanaugh based on them means that any nominee should be rejected whenever a dubious uncorroborated accusation is levied against them. Just in case it might be true.

I'd rather take the risk that a sexual predator might get into high office than destroy the whole nomination process. One error is worse than the other and we cannot minimize both. Its like food production. You know your not going to produce the exactly right amount of food so it it better to error on the side of producing too much and have some waste rather than too little and have people die of starvation.

I firmly believe that most of you reading this understand it and want Kavanaugh rejected because of his ideology. You're just using these unfounded accusation as an excuse.

Why didnt these "left wing whackjobs" who will do "whatever it takes" put up even slight resistance to Gorsuch last year?

The few people dumber in the world than you are nominated a dud. Trump could have gotten half of the TV judges through. Pirro probably would have made it. He nominated a drunk who lies, gambles, cheats and got caught.

Kavanaugh has perjured himself multiple times! He has lied even more in the last week! I dont lnow why the mods still let you post here tbh, its degrading to the quality of this forum. It's like how it took 2 years to figure out dbj was astro turfing.

If Kavanaugh didnt have a history of perjury
Didnt have super shady financials
Made amends for his teenage indiscretions rather than saying he didn't get drunk

...he would breeze through and this thread would have maybe 300 posts.

Simulated octupling down

Gorsuch was replacing Scalia so it maintained the status quo. Maybe even a slight improvement from the left wing's perspective. People can live with the status quo....even the left winged whackos. Kavanaugh threatens a dramatic shift of the court to the right and thats a red line for some people.

Be honest with yourselves. You left wing whackos thought one Trump scotus pick was bad but when he got a second, now that was catastrophic. Perhaps even enough to cause a psychotic break in some of you.

The nomination process was already destroyed when Republicans stole a seat.

Welp, back to the fantasy storytelling drawing board, sim. Looking forward to the next installment. See you soon

So massive lying and perjury isnt a big deal because he's on your team.
So, "whatever it takes" lasted...one post. You have really great internal logic here. It's really working well.

Can you inform us about the most radical anti trump measures the left has taken? Since they've assumed a "whatever it takes" position I'm picturing "Red Dawn" in my head.

unfounded accusation

eat a toadstool, pig

That was a dick move by the republicans, but not unprecedented. Nominations have been held up much longer than Garlands. Garland was never going to get confirmed but he at least deserved a vote.

I haven't educated myself on the perjury accusations against Kavanaugh. Since it isn't being talked about anywhere except in left winged cabals I just assume its a nothingburger.