Brazilian election 2018. - Page 6 - Politics and Economics

I was just replying to the misinformation that the "military" police "invaded" the universities, like it was him that mandate it.

It was someone from the university that told the Bolsonaro campaign they were making campaign pro Haddad in public schools. Since PT is calling him fascist and a "Nazista" during the campaign, those banners were also retired by order from the electoral comission, which doesn't belong to any party. Inside some of the schools (not all) there was material of Haddad campaign. Go read the articles in portuguese if you have doubts.

11-01-2018 , 07:17 PM

#128

JackBurton

grinder

Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 588

I'm also going to quote something about judge Moro that is being criticized for not going after current president Temer (from center right party), by the biased left leaning propaganda that is making the rounds recently:

Quote:

This is a lie. Moro is a "1st instance" judge. He could not act against PSDB accused because they had nominations and/or elected posts... which means that has to be treated by the Supreme Court. What it means? It means that nobody of the 1st instance, the 2nd instance, the Superior Tribunal of Justice (3rd instance) could prosecute them. Yeah, Brazil have 4 instances of Justice. The first one, is for investigation and prosecution, giving the first sentence. The second one, revise the prosecution and the penalty (happened to Lula for him to be arrested << Lula is here). The third one, analyses the technical aspects of the prosecution. The last one, analyses the constitutionality of the prosecution, forming guides to be followed. So FOUR judges have considered him guilty not only Moro. The other 3 were from the superior instance, the "collegiate organ"... they even raise Lula's penalty in 3 years (Moro give 9 years and 1 month, the other 3 gave him 12 years). Lula was condemned in two instances, not just Moro's... THAT'S WHY he is in jail... because it is (currently) considered as "judged at transit" as our Constitution dictates. Who could prosecute the affiliates of PSDB? The Republic's General Prosecutor... Rodrigo Janot. Who didn't even try to be reelected to the office because of the JBS scandal, where he did negotiate a full pardon to depose the current President (Temer). I thought France 24 were less partial, I hope to be right. We are tired of biased misinformation. BRAZIL, is not for amateurs.

11-01-2018 , 07:30 PM

#129

Namath12

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 55,849

Quote:

Originally Posted by daca

what im hearing is CIRO WOULD HAVE WON

This is underrated

11-01-2018 , 08:31 PM

#130

Money2Burn

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 12,628

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul D

Because the capitalist system is the only system and empowers monsters... come on Trolly you know better.

Would you consider this post evidence of your superior critical thinking abilities?

11-15-2018 , 08:33 PM

#131

KansasCT

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 10,074

So Bolsonaro just ended Brazil's deal with Cuba and over 15k Cuban doctors are leaving the country.
He said he's sending them back because Cuba gets 75% of their salary and asked for that to end in the new deal, along with some other things like allowing the doctors families to come to Brazil.
Thing is, there's a video of him promising to send Cubans back to their country or to guantanamo, whatever they prefer so they can treat his opposition there.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...program-slave/

Things are about to become even more chaotic because Cuban doctors were responsible for taking care of the poorest regions in Brazil, places that Brazilian doctors didn't like going.
Everyone I know (including my mom and wife) that was treated by cuban doctors have nothing but good things to say about them. They are very careful and loving people who pay a lot more attention to the patients than their Brazilian counterparts.

11-18-2018 , 10:48 AM

#132

bacalaopeace

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2018 Posts: 1,881

That's the whole point really. He wants to reinforce social and economic disparities. It's the same vision as the right in fully developed countries - fully elitist and aristocratic - It's all well and good that services cost money, because that way we don't have to share them.