Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
Not pulling Garland, who was as good of a compromise nominee as Republicans could hope for, would ensure that Republicans would look at their stunt as a freeroll and would ensure its use in the future. By pulling Garland Obama wouldn't be setting a precedent -- he would be preventing the Republicans from setting an extremely worrying precedent.
I think it boils down to whether Obama himself compromised on the Garland pick. For example, if he would have preferred another candidate but picked Garland because he was more moderate (and an old white guy) hoping to get him through the GOP Senate, then perhaps he will pull him. However, if Obama truly thought that Garland is the best candidate hands down, then no, he won't pull him.
I think it's really as easy as that.
HRC is going to be able to nominate her own justices anyway. Kennedy, RBG and Breyer may all retire this term.