Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Betting on Elections thread Betting on Elections thread

08-05-2016 , 11:13 AM
He could phrase it correctly, be all "now we have a new President-elect, I'll leave it to her". I mean I agree it's not likely, I just don't think the Garland nom is 100% to still be on the table if Hillary wins, especially if it's a devastating loss for the GOP.
08-05-2016 , 11:19 AM
Garland is also incredibly qualified and well respected, you can't really compare him to Myers. Plus, Hillary has the potential to appoint multiple justices, so Obama not withdrawing Garland isn't exactly robbing her of the ability to make her own appointments.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
He could phrase it correctly, be all "now we have a new President-elect, I'll leave it to her". I mean I agree it's not likely, I just don't think the Garland nom is 100% to still be on the table if Hillary wins, especially if it's a devastating loss for the GOP.
He doesn't have to be 100% on the table for that bet to have value in the low 30s
08-05-2016 , 01:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Pulling the nominee just to game the system is a worrying precedent and a little disrespectful to Garland. Can't really imagine Obama doing it.
Not withdrawing means the GOP freerolled with their childishness here, though, and encourages them to do it again in the future.

Granted, it's the GOP we're talking about, they don't need all that much encouragement to do it again anyway - but still.

I tend to agree that Garland probably doesn't get withdrawn, but I think it's a misstep.
08-06-2016 , 01:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Thanks.

Match:



Edit: Sorry for not being clearer with a PM or whatever.
08-06-2016 , 02:04 AM
Supposedly you can get 10-1 from William Hill if you bet that Trump withdraws. Depending on how that is defined, it seems like an overlay.
08-06-2016 , 02:52 AM
It's trading at 7c on PredictIt, which is better even after subtracting their 10% rake on profits.
08-06-2016 , 02:52 AM
Really don't see Trump withdrawing though.
08-06-2016 , 06:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Pulling the nominee just to game the system is a worrying precedent and a little disrespectful to Garland. Can't really imagine Obama doing it.
Not pulling Garland, who was as good of a compromise nominee as Republicans could hope for, would ensure that Republicans would look at their stunt as a freeroll and would ensure its use in the future. By pulling Garland Obama wouldn't be setting a precedent -- he would be preventing the Republicans from setting an extremely worrying precedent.
08-06-2016 , 06:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I made this bet in the Scalia thread when he died:







I think I'm a fish for not specifying before the election. Looks increasingly likely Garland does get confirmed but only after (if) Republicans lose in November.
hmmmmmm I think I still win if Hilldawg wins, takes office, doesn't nominate anyone (or withdraw Garland's nomination) and Garland gets confirmed. Right?
08-06-2016 , 06:58 AM
PI's Trump withdraw contract is through August 30th, and doesn't cover death

I maxed that one at 89 cents for NO
08-06-2016 , 07:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
Not pulling Garland, who was as good of a compromise nominee as Republicans could hope for, would ensure that Republicans would look at their stunt as a freeroll and would ensure its use in the future. By pulling Garland Obama wouldn't be setting a precedent -- he would be preventing the Republicans from setting an extremely worrying precedent.
I think it boils down to whether Obama himself compromised on the Garland pick. For example, if he would have preferred another candidate but picked Garland because he was more moderate (and an old white guy) hoping to get him through the GOP Senate, then perhaps he will pull him. However, if Obama truly thought that Garland is the best candidate hands down, then no, he won't pull him.

I think it's really as easy as that.

HRC is going to be able to nominate her own justices anyway. Kennedy, RBG and Breyer may all retire this term.
08-06-2016 , 10:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by domer2
PI's Trump withdraw contract is through August 30th, and doesn't cover death

I maxed that one at 89 cents for NO
lol, didnt realize that, thats insane. Wish I could sign up at PI.
08-06-2016 , 11:02 AM
If anyone is interested in some high comedy, I recommend the GOP 370+ EVs comments thread on PI. Sample:

Quote:
Michael Barber DTrump • 7 days ago
Trump will win MI (Clinton was ONLY +3 in the last poll). Trump will win NM. Trump will win ME (at least most of it). Trump will Win OR. Trump will win IL. Please recalculate your "math".

jaguars DTrump • 9 days ago
He can easily get MN, ME, WA, OR, and MI off that map. NJ also within reach.
08-06-2016 , 11:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
I think it boils down to whether Obama himself compromised on the Garland pick. For example, if he would have preferred another candidate but picked Garland because he was more moderate (and an old white guy) hoping to get him through the GOP Senate, then perhaps he will pull him. However, if Obama truly thought that Garland is the best candidate hands down, then no, he won't pull him.

I think it's really as easy as that.

HRC is going to be able to nominate her own justices anyway. Kennedy, RBG and Breyer may all retire this term.
I don't care if Obama compromised or not. He can't let the GOP get away with this nonsense unpunished. Need to nominate a 38 year old who will be on the court for the next seven decades. **** em
08-06-2016 , 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
If anyone is interested in some high comedy, I recommend the GOP 370+ EVs comments thread on PI. Sample:
PI is a great example of Poe's Law. I'm reasonably sure that some of them are just trolls trying to manipulate the price. OTOH, someone out there is buying TRUMP370 shares.

Quote:
Originally Posted by domer2
PI's Trump withdraw contract is through August 30th, and doesn't cover death

I maxed that one at 89 cents for NO
Solid play. idk why everyone is speculating about Trump voluntarily withdrawing, but there's just no way that ever happens. That cuts against everything we know about the man.
08-06-2016 , 11:23 AM
I don't think that Michael Barber dude is a troll. I mean here are a couple of comments from him:

Quote:
You ASSume a lot because your mind is contaminated with your desire for a Democrat clouded with a hatred of any Republican...Trump is just the flavor of the hatred day.

If Trump wins all the GOP locks, all the GOP leans, all the tossups, all the Democrat leans and 1 of the Democrat states, he will be at 371. You find this concept "impossible" today. However, in 2 short months, you will start to question what is "possible" and "impossible". It will cause you to question your faith, but you won't sell...thinking it is only a short term problem. Then in 3 months, your whole world is going to be turned upside down. By then, it will be too late to sell...you would get $.10 on every $1 you put into the market. That is my analysis.
Quote:
Yeh, unlikely on MA and RI. Agreed. This is the final map Irrational Thought. It is not going to be rocket science as to how he gets to 370. Remember Trump is running against a proven liar and a criminal. You assume that Democrats are such a dishonest bunch of people that they will vote Democrat no matter what. Please, you need to have more faith and give the Democrats more credit than that. Sure 1/3 of the Democrats would vote for Lee Harvey Oswald for President if he won the nomination but not 100%....and therein lies the problem.
If this dude is merely imitating a clueless Trumpkin, he needs an Oscar.
08-06-2016 , 11:23 AM
Where can I learn about how this trading contracts stuff works?
08-06-2016 , 11:25 AM
Bonus 3-sigma comment:

Quote:
klongloff Michael Barber • 5 days ago
Michael is the only person on the website that graduated from 3rd grade 5 times, and then stopped going to school.

Michael Barber klongloff • 4 days ago
I graduated 2nd in my class my friend with a 3.999999 average. I got straight A's except for 1 B.
08-06-2016 , 11:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
Where can I learn about how this trading contracts stuff works?
It's not complicated. You buy contracts for the price indicated. They expire at 0c or 100c. If you buy at 50c, you either double your money or lose it all. It so happens that through the wonders of math, the price you buy at should reflect your belief of the percentage chance that the thing happens. That is, if you buy at 25c, you should believe the thing happens >= 25% of the time.

Edit: Oh and PI takes 10% of profits on every market. I forget how it works if you bet both yes and no on a binary market, someone else will know.
08-06-2016 , 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
It's not complicated. You buy contracts for the price indicated. They expire at 0c or 100c. If you buy at 50c, you either double your money or lose it all. It so happens that through the wonders of math, the price you buy at should reflect your belief of the percentage chance that the thing happens. That is, if you buy at 25c, you should believe the thing happens >= 25% of the time.

Edit: Oh and PI takes 10% of profits on every market. I forget how it works if you bet both yes and no on a binary market, someone else will know.
Thanks.

So on Domer's 89 cents on NO for Trump withdrawing by end of August, he'll make 11 cents (per unit or whatever) if he doesn't withdraw?
08-06-2016 , 11:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
Thanks.

So on Domer's 89 cents on NO for Trump withdrawing by end of August, he'll make 11 cents (per unit or whatever) if he doesn't withdraw?
Exactly. You can buy YES or NO shares for each event, so for this market, you can buy a YES share for 11 cents and get a dollar if Trump pulls out, or you can buy a NO share for 89 cents and get a dollar if he doesn't pull out. So it's basically a matter of doing simple pot odds calculations.

You can also try to sell your shares. You don't have to wait for the event to happen.
08-06-2016 , 11:41 AM
Well, he'll make 11c profit on an 89c investment, so like 12.4% (11c/89c) profit on his money or something. The same way if he bought at 50c, he would make 100% on his money. Except PI takes 10% of profits, so factoring that in he'll make like 11.1% on his investment.
08-06-2016 , 11:42 AM
Also should be mentioned that PI max bet on a single market is $850.
08-06-2016 , 11:43 AM
Thanks guys.

One last question: Can I use paypal or credit card or is this stuff restricted like poker deposits for US citizens?

Edit: on the PI website now. Credit card is apparently no problem. Only problem is NO on withdraw is now up to 93 cents.

Last edited by Jbrochu; 08-06-2016 at 11:53 AM.
08-06-2016 , 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
Well, he'll make 11c profit on an 89c investment, so like 12.4% (11c/89c) profit on his money or something. The same way if he bought at 50c, he would make 100% on his money. Except PI takes 10% of profits, so factoring that in he'll make like 11.1% on his investment.
Looks like a 5% fee on withdrawals too. That's a killer.

      
m