Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Alabama Special Election (Roy Moore diddles, GOP thumbs up, Mr. Jones goes to Washington) Alabama Special Election (Roy Moore diddles, GOP thumbs up, Mr. Jones goes to Washington)

11-14-2017 , 02:07 AM
As a non american. Just came here to say wow.
11-14-2017 , 02:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Oh Bryce. You've got it all wrong. The coyote was wily. The wabbit was wascally.
when i was 5 they aired like happy days and bigs bunny and tom and jered and i love lucy then when i was ~15 they put on friends. it was the first time i felt old
11-14-2017 , 02:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios


So this yearbook was signed during the Christmas season I guess. Most high school yearbooks come out at the end of the school year, in late spring, I'm pretty sure. I guess it could have been a yearbook from the previous school year.
Manuel for discrediting accusers: nitpick minor details for which you are too lazy to find a plausible explanation. Now focus the debate on those minor details.
11-14-2017 , 02:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rugby
As a non american. Just came here to say wow.
It's not like Polanski protecting euros don't have their Prince Andrews.
11-14-2017 , 04:19 AM
Roy Moore Is Poison In The Republican Bloodstream

http://www.al.com/opinion/index.ssf/...incart_m-rpt-2
11-14-2017 , 04:22 AM
As crazy as this sounds, I'm not convinced that the Roy Moore pedophilia thing is going to cost him the election.

The average Trump supporter is stupid (or at a minimum, has zero critical thinking skills, even if they are able to perform technical work), angry, has massive doses of confirmation bias, is extremely hostile to the "left wing media" and suspicious of what they perceive as manufactured controversies, and relies upon Fox News to tell them what to think.

To put it simply, I think there's a very good chance that the average Republican simply won't believe this, facts be damned. Or they'll find some way to justify it. Will be interesting to see what the ultimate outcome is here.
11-14-2017 , 04:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Dude was basically the town creeper
Call me an elitist country club liberal if you must, but you gotta be pretty damn creepy to be too creepy for the YMCA.
11-14-2017 , 04:49 AM
That doesn't sound even slightly crazy.
11-14-2017 , 04:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Right. And one of the tragic things is that the right uses this to blunt criticism of their increasingly extreme political behaviors. So a whole industry of journalists and other apologists will note SOME combination of partisanship plus civic duty that explains why right-wingers vote for Moore, just as they did for Trump. Hey, we gotta vote, and Democrats are terrible for us, so a sex predator it is. You voted for Bill Clinton, no different! blah blah.

No one should expect any different. Partisanship IS strong. For everyone. We've had some people admit they would vote for Sex Predator Democrat over Trump and I dunno, fair enough I guess? We'd all be put to a tough decision. But it's obviously a weird thought construction since the parties and the primary process exists primarily so that doesn't happen.

The right wing pundit class, et al wins some people to this way of thinking -- that poor Republicans are just leafs in the wind and the one and only political action the right winger ever takes is voting in the general election, forgive them, they cared so much about abortion and judges they just have to vote for sex predator creeps and racist, too bad.

The strongest condemnation of the right, imo, isn't that they vote for Trumps and Moores when it's time for the general election. It's shameful but we can appreciate how game theory works.

The biggest blight on the right is that guys like Trump and Moore, who it should be reminded wants to exclude Muslims from public office and criminalize homosexuality, get through the primaries over more mainstream candidates.

That is the truly heinous thing. You can clearly identify the increasingly reactionary, angry, fascisting thinking taking over the right not by their general election behaviors but by the authoritarian deplorables getting through their primaries. In no healthy party are Donald Trump and Roy Moore candidates for anything. The Access Hollywood tapes and sexual assault of minors revelations highlight what everyone else already knew about these types of people. That the right has no filter and these guys are on ballots for the general election is their true, principle failing as a party and a movement dedicated to any decency whatsoever.
Not sure if anyone here is a listener to the 538 podcast and I'm not active on Twitter and so too lazy to tweet @NateSilver538, but he basically caped for right-wingers in just this way -- tut-tuting at woke liberals for indicating that this has anything to do with Alabama and conservative values, partisanship is strong and it's completely rational to vote for Moore. He even did the whole "well, if they had a choice..."

But they had a normal deplorable choice: Luther Strange

But the incredibly deplorable Moore won.

Surprising how much traction this apologetic gets. As I said, it's first or second level thinking. True enough on its face. But when do Republicans, the right, conservative Christians, etc. have their reckoning for nominating someone like Moore? The whole primary fight was about how brazenly unfit Moore was -- temperamentally, philosophically, politically -- for office. A bunch of elites in his own party said that (granted those 'elites' are basically now disrespected swamp creatures; also the point).

As has been documented: Roy Moore ignores SCOTUS orders, thinks gays should be prosecuted, thinks Muslims can't hold office. Then we find out he did what you might predict people with incredibly loathsome mindsets that dehumanize wide swaths of humanity and disrespect legal boundaries might do, and then we ...finger-wag at liberals for drawing any systemic conclusions about collective moral rot from this kind of **** parade. IF ONLY REPUBLICANS HAD A CHOICE. WHATAABOUT YOUR PARTISANSHIP

sigh
11-14-2017 , 04:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by synth_floyd
Most people from Alabama like Roy Moore and like what he stands for so they either don't believe, don't choose to believe or straight up don't care about the pedophilia accusations and rumours. I think he will win, unfortunately.
You are wrong, synth_floyd. If "most people" in Alabama liked Roy Moore and what he stands for, the race wouldn't even be close. As it stands at this moment, the polling has tightened with a few of the polls showing Doug Jones ahead or pulling ahead. I'm an admitted (biased) "librul" who intends to vote for Doug Jones, but I sense the [political] earth moving underneath our feet. People are listening (and paying attention) to the various reports. They're processing the information and making their own judgments as to who's telling the truth - and who's lying. I have a sense that women, especially, are paying attention. People are not talking about this, at least not the people I'm around, but they're definitely paying attention and evaluating. This is the kind of thing that resonates, the kind of thing that provokes heavy voter turnout.

Roy Moore definitely has supporters in this state who will vote for him come hell or high water. His "base" is significant, but his base is not monolithic or an outright majority. (According to AL.com, approximately 49 percent of registered voters in Alabama identify themselves as evangelical Christians.) These allegations have to be deeply troubling to a subset of his base. The question will boil down to how many of Roy Moore's base believe Moore's accusers and are troubled enough [about the accusations] to either vote against Roy Moore - or not vote at all. That number is not zero.

With a race as close as the polls are indicating, a heavy Democratic turnout combined with as little as 5 percent of Moore's voters staying home could make the difference. Plus, nobody knows what the news will bring tomorrow. Mark Shields, the syndicated columnist, is famous for observing that in politics a day is a week, a week is a month, and a month is a year. Maybe this is wishful thinking more than a cold hard assessment of reality, but I get the feeling that the tide is turning against Roy Moore.

Last edited by Former DJ; 11-14-2017 at 05:10 AM.
11-14-2017 , 06:34 AM
Five-Thirty-Eight: How Roy Moore Could Lose Alabama's Senate Race

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...s-senate-race/

This is one of the best (most insightful) analysis I've read yet. What's more, it just might be correct.
11-14-2017 , 06:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by estefaniocurry
Manuel for discrediting accusers: nitpick minor details for which you are too lazy to find a plausible explanation. Now focus the debate on those minor details.
Whether or not he actually signed the book is a minor detail? As it turns out there's a video from the Young-Allred news conferance showing the yearbook's date of 1977. So the yearbook comes out at the end of the school year in 1977 and 6-7 months later she's trucking it to the restaurant where she works and having people sign it? Maybe since it was Christmas and 1977 was so great for her that she wanted some Christmas memories in year high school yearbook? Or maybe she had it sitting around the restaurant where she worked having customers sign it 6 to 7 months later? Maybe the yearbook came out half way through the school year?

I am willing to believe Moore is at the very least a flawed character. Btw his wife is 14 years younger than he is so she was 24 when they were married. So him pursuing 16,17 and 18 year olds at age 32 seems highly probable. However, this newest allegation is at the very least questionable. Pretty sure hand writing "experts" will weigh in with some claiming it is his signature and some claiming it isn't.
11-14-2017 , 07:01 AM
i think doug jones will win and im willing to bet pocket change on it.
11-14-2017 , 07:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
So I guess Moore stopped taking teens to the woods once one of them let him put a ring on it since we surprisingly haven't heard of any post-marriage teens.
In Alabama that's called "going' a-courtin'"
11-14-2017 , 07:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Whether or not he actually signed the book is a minor detail? As it turns out there's a video from the Young-Allred news conferance showing the yearbook's date of 1977. So the yearbook comes out at the end of the school year in 1977 and 6-7 months later she's trucking it to the restaurant where she works and having people sign it? Maybe since it was Christmas and 1977 was so great for her that she wanted some Christmas memories in year high school yearbook? Or maybe she had it sitting around the restaurant where she worked having customers sign it 6 to 7 months later? Maybe the yearbook came out half way through the school year?

I am willing to believe Moore is at the very least a flawed character. Btw his wife is 14 years younger than he is so she was 24 when they were married. So him pursuing 16,17 and 18 year olds at age 32 seems highly probable. However, this newest allegation is at the very least questionable. Pretty sure hand writing "experts" will weigh in with some claiming it is his signature and some claiming it isn't.
maybe the yearbook came out around christmas.

regardless, I remember many people getting their yearbooks signed throughout their senior year. often kids would wait to sign a yearbook until a special even. like, omigod, sally, you are my bestie, I want to wait until our totally rad spring break trip to sign your yearbook. or, danny loves me so much and we are gonna get married, I want him to wait until after our super romantic homecoming (or prom) to sign.

some kids made good friends with someone during their senior year and then asked for a yearbook signing, which could obv happen at the middle or end of the year.

tldr, at my school yearbook signing was srs biz and did indeed happen all year for various reasons.

and even further, given the accusations thus far, and scuttlebut from his hometown, yes this is a minor detail.
11-14-2017 , 08:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Whether or not he actually signed the book is a minor detail? As it turns out there's a video from the Young-Allred news conferance showing the yearbook's date of 1977. So the yearbook comes out at the end of the school year in 1977 and 6-7 months later she's trucking it to the restaurant where she works and having people sign it? Maybe since it was Christmas and 1977 was so great for her that she wanted some Christmas memories in year high school yearbook? Or maybe she had it sitting around the restaurant where she worked having customers sign it 6 to 7 months later? Maybe the yearbook came out half way through the school year?

I am willing to believe Moore is at the very least a flawed character. Btw his wife is 14 years younger than he is so she was 24 when they were married. So him pursuing 16,17 and 18 year olds at age 32 seems highly probable. However, this newest allegation is at the very least questionable. Pretty sure hand writing "experts" will weigh in with some claiming it is his signature and some claiming it isn't.
"Handwriting analysis" is basically a debunked forensic science at this point.
11-14-2017 , 08:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Whether or not he actually signed the book is a minor detail? As it turns out there's a video from the Young-Allred news conferance showing the yearbook's date of 1977. So the yearbook comes out at the end of the school year in 1977 and 6-7 months later she's trucking it to the restaurant where she works and having people sign it? Maybe since it was Christmas and 1977 was so great for her that she wanted some Christmas memories in year high school yearbook? Or maybe she had it sitting around the restaurant where she worked having customers sign it 6 to 7 months later? Maybe the yearbook came out half way through the school year?

I am willing to believe Moore is at the very least a flawed character. Btw his wife is 14 years younger than he is so she was 24 when they were married. So him pursuing 16,17 and 18 year olds at age 32 seems highly probable. However, this newest allegation is at the very least questionable. Pretty sure hand writing "experts" will weigh in with some claiming it is his signature and some claiming it isn't.
Quick, does anyone know the melting point of the book binding?
11-14-2017 , 09:42 AM
you cant melt that binding with jet fuel
11-14-2017 , 09:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Whether or not he actually signed the book is a minor detail? As it turns out there's a video from the Young-Allred news conferance showing the yearbook's date of 1977. So the yearbook comes out at the end of the school year in 1977 and 6-7 months later she's trucking it to the restaurant where she works and having people sign it? Maybe since it was Christmas and 1977 was so great for her that she wanted some Christmas memories in year high school yearbook? Or maybe she had it sitting around the restaurant where she worked having customers sign it 6 to 7 months later? Maybe the yearbook came out half way through the school year?

I am willing to believe Moore is at the very least a flawed character. Btw his wife is 14 years younger than he is so she was 24 when they were married. So him pursuing 16,17 and 18 year olds at age 32 seems highly probable. However, this newest allegation is at the very least questionable. Pretty sure hand writing "experts" will weigh in with some claiming it is his signature and some claiming it isn't.
No one is forcing you to go to bat for a pedophile just because he's a Republican. You can just...not do it. Unless you live in Alabama, you don't even have to decide whether or not to vote for him.
11-14-2017 , 10:18 AM
Adios,

What is a reasonable alternative explanation for that signature in your opinion?

She kept a yearbook for 40 years and then forged it herself last week after the allegations came out to make herself look good? You think if someone went through all the trouble to fake it then they decided to date it with a time that raised your spidey sense?

Or someone wrote that as a joke 40 years ago and were waiting just for this moment to bring it out?
11-14-2017 , 10:22 AM
lol adios

He asked her to sign it at the restaurant where she worked. He even put 'Old Hickory House' on the entry. A grown ass adult asking to sign girls' yearbooks should send off all kind of alarms imo.

Also:

Spoiler:
11-14-2017 , 10:30 AM
Also, if you were to forge a yearbook signing, why the **** put a December date? It would be weird and attracts attention. It reminds me of the ID I used to have when I was just turning 21 -- it was 8 random numbers that lined up in a way that every single person who saw it would say something about it. A couple times buying beer I got crap about it and they thought there was no way an ID would have generated a number like this -- but if I really made a fake ID, why do something that draws attention to it?
11-14-2017 , 10:42 AM
Today, adios learns that not every single school in the entire country is exactly the same as the school he attended.

Tomorrow he will be shocked, SHOCKED, to find out that not everyone in the country needs sprinklers because some people have yards made from rocks.
11-14-2017 , 10:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by prana
He asked her to sign it at the restaurant where she worked. He even put 'Old Hickory House' on the entry. A grown ass adult asking to sign girls' yearbooks should send off all kind of alarms imo.
Yes, but he knows it's so likely to send off alarms that there's no way if he's guilty he ever would have signed the yearbook, see? That signature just proves he couldn't possibly be a pedo!
11-14-2017 , 10:49 AM
Adios, why is it so difficult for you to believe Roy Moore is a scumbag? You're really struggling itt. Did you have the same sort of struggle accepting Foley and Hastert were scumbags?

      
m