Alabama Special Election (Roy Moore diddles, GOP thumbs up, Mr. Jones goes to Washington) - Page 135 - Politics and Economics

Maybe Alabama has a provision still on the books that an old white racist who loses because of the black vote can get the courts to only count black votes as worth 3/5ths or white votes?

Edit

Guess not.

The spirit of the founders says the election is legitimate as long as you don't disenfranchise more than 40% of black voters.

12-28-2017 , 12:51 PM

#3353

fatkid

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 8,860

Roy Moore files complaint to block Alabama Senate result says he will touch more kids if he is not declared the winner.

12-28-2017 , 01:53 PM

#3354

PoppaTMan

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,862

Gotta imagine those donor lists are getting pounded daily at this point.

12-28-2017 , 02:50 PM

#3355

JPantz

veteran

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 2,144

Rejected.

12-28-2017 , 03:00 PM

#3356

w00t

banned

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 1,561

Roy Moore, the gift that keeps on giving.

12-28-2017 , 03:10 PM

#3357

Original Position

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 9,426

Quote:

Originally Posted by stinkubus

Original Position seems to want one. That's what I was talking about.

Not really. My original question was about Loki's view of the legitimacy of the Alabama election. I inferred from his comments before the election that he didn't think it was legitimate and I wanted to know, given the results, if that was still his view and why. If I misunderstood how Loki was using the word "rigged" or "fix," and he didn't mean to imply that the election was illegitimate, my question is moot.

12-28-2017 , 03:18 PM

#3358

rockfsh

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 2,530

This is why polygraphs are not accurate enough to be admitted as evidence in court.
Note that he did not submit the actual test results or state that he only took one test

Last edited by rockfsh; 12-28-2017 at 03:23 PM.

12-28-2017 , 03:31 PM

#3359

Loki

binary duo

Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 12,772

Didn’t Moore say he actually knew some of the women originally?

12-28-2017 , 03:38 PM

#3360

rockfsh

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 2,530

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loki

Didn’t Moore say he actually knew some of the women originally?

He is limiting this to those named in the affidavit. Maybe he means "know" in the biblical sense. He never got that far.

Why didn't he offer to take a polygraph before the election?

12-28-2017 , 03:39 PM

#3361

MvdB

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,562

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loki

Didn’t Moore say he actually knew some of the women originally?

There were also many more accusers. He’s implicitly saying he only passed the test for three of them.

12-28-2017 , 03:57 PM

#3362

Namath12

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 55,849

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockfsh

This is why polygraphs are not accurate enough to be admitted as evidence in court.
Note that he did not submit the actual test results or state that he only took one test

Polygraphs are also eminently beatable. This American Life had a story this past summer about a guy named Doug Williams who spent half his life administering them (as a cop) before disavowing them completely, and he tells you right there in the episode how to reliably beat one. He was also instrumental in getting the Employee Polygraph Protection Act passed. Later he wound up in federal prison for (allegedly) helping someone beat a polygraph.

Definitely worth a listen if you're into such things:

https://www.thisamericanlife.org/rad...r-lie-detector

http://polygraph.com/

12-28-2017 , 04:02 PM

#3363

bigt2k4

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 15,296

Quote:

Originally Posted by Namath12

The guys on Mythbusters tried using a bunch of tactics to beat them and couldn't

12-28-2017 , 04:03 PM

#3364

gobbo

Trust the fat man.

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 15,623

Cliffs: Clench your butt when answering.

12-28-2017 , 04:16 PM

#3365

cuserounder

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 8,217

Quote:

Originally Posted by MvdB

There were also many more accusers. He’s implicitly saying he only passed the test for three of them.

Good enough for his supporters to say "But he passed a lie detector! HE'S INNOCENT!"

Never mind that he never provided the results.

12-28-2017 , 04:51 PM

#3366

PartyGirlUK

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 23,530

12-28-2017 , 05:01 PM

#3367

iron81

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 17,729

"Alabama Association of Polygraph Examiners"

Real or Onion?

12-28-2017 , 05:04 PM

#3368

cuserounder

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 8,217

That was like a non-concession concession.

I think this clown is going to start a church and get rich off of the offering plate. o/u 6 months until "Reverend Roy 'The Judge' Moore" is making appearances on Fox?

12-28-2017 , 09:00 PM

#3369

fatboy8

journeyman

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 341

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuserounder

Under, by about 5 months. I expect to see him on Fox, and possibly even his own show, by February.

12-28-2017 , 10:00 PM

#3370

PoppaTMan

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,862

Fox may have no scruples, but they ain't stupid. You can get a similar message without his baggage from any number of places.

12-29-2017 , 09:43 AM

#3371

tomdemaine

Just tries harder

Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 20,065

The baggage is the message. The tribal signal that 'we hate liberals so much that we'll pay this disgusting backward evil pedophile millions because he upsets them'.