Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Then disavow ALL of it. The last 20 years of ever-worsening dog whistle politics. Of American's insane foreign policy and torture. Fox News. AM Radio. Breitbart. Bannon. Steve King. GOP leadership. Mercer and the donor class funding garbage humans like Milo and giving them a microphone.
Don't start with ****ing pedophilia. What sort of moral compass is that?
Something something that's all too liberal, gotta start with pedophilia then slowly work up deplorables sense of shame from there. Good strategy, good luck with that.
You're stretching my take way farther than it was intended to go. First of all, Romney did at least speak out against Trump for his rhetoric. He's been a somewhat consistent critic of Trumpism.
I agree 100% that someone needs to step up and disavow all of it. The point I'm trying to make is, that person needs to be a Republican. We ARE pointing out the disgracefulness and unacceptability of all of it. But, we're just partisan enemies to these voters. Someone they have approved of before needs to do it... and yes, far more strongly than they have so far, but in a world where so far there are like four prominent Republican "outspoken," critics of Trump, we need more and we need them to be louder and more critical.
So my point is, I think we should say, "Good job, at least someone has the guts to speak up against X, Y, Z, now admit that your party led us here." instead of "**** that guy, he's been part of the problem."
EVERYONE that a GOP voter will view as having the authority and respect to point out how morally ****ed that party is has been part of the problem.
Now, if your preference is hard line moral absolutism, I respect the virtue of that... I just don't see how it helps us improve the circumstances. Long-term, Democrats are never winning in Alabama. We may steal this seat for 2 years, but it's going to flip right back.
We need someone to lead the GOP back to a place where at least the degree of deplorability is containable. I think it better serves us not to bitterly attack the only people doing anything at all to do that. I think Mitt Romney occupying a Senate seat in Utah would be a big win for the left, and for America in general.
So, in summation of a long-winding response, I'd just say I prefer a route of... "Good for you for speaking up, and thank you for having common decency. That said, what do you have to say about the party's rhetoric over the last 15 years leading to this? Were you complicit? If you don't think so, how do you defend it?"