Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
2018 Midterms Gameday Thread UPDATE 15 Mississippi still WOAT 2018 Midterms Gameday Thread UPDATE 15 Mississippi still WOAT

11-06-2018 , 12:47 PM
At what time can we expect the results to start coming? Like when the first races close for voting at 6 pm ET, at what time can we expect to know with decent certainty who won those?
11-06-2018 , 12:47 PM
ResistanceHole: Absolutely perfect: hero millennial announces he is here to cancel out deplorable grandmother's vote. GOOD DAY!
11-06-2018 , 12:49 PM
Keeeeeeeeeeeed
11-06-2018 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andro
At what time can we expect the results to start coming? Like when the first races close for voting at 6 pm ET, at what time can we expect to know with decent certainty who won those?


For california it could be weeks
11-06-2018 , 12:51 PM
Place is more packed than I've ever seen it, even on a presidential
11-06-2018 , 12:56 PM
You know deplorables are intentionally taking a long time to make voting more frustrating for Democrats and people who have lives. I guess they figure they can wait long enough and leave thousands unable to vote due to polls closing.

Malfunctioning voting machines is another interesting trick.
11-06-2018 , 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andro
At what time can we expect the results to start coming? Like when the first races close for voting at 6 pm ET, at what time can we expect to know with decent certainty who won those?
I have a hard time believing that we'll know the result of Indiana Senate in the first hour given how close the polling has been and given that some precincts will still be open during that first hour.

With Kentucky not having early voting, I'd be surprised if they could make a really quick call in KY-06 too, and if they do then I fear it would be bad news.

We could easily see strong signs in that first hour, but I doubt we get to "decent certainty" until at least the next set of states opens.
11-06-2018 , 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
The CA ballot is absurd. If I walked into the polling place without having looked at it before, and if I cared to think through the various issues, it could easily take an hour.
There was also a ton of bull**** on my ballot in TX. Both wordy props and a ton of non-partisan local races, would've easily taken 15-20 minutes if I hadn't looked at it beforehand.
11-06-2018 , 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
You know deplorables are intentionally taking a long time to make voting more frustrating for Democrats and people who have lives. I guess they figure they can wait long enough and leave thousands unable to vote due to polls closing.


When I was a student, frats at Univ of Alabama (dubbed “The Machine”) used to make their pledges stand in line during SGA elections to ensure one of theirs always won
11-06-2018 , 01:08 PM
Need Mason to tell me who is better for the POKER ECONOMY!

I mean I assume the people behind the kids in cages, but need confirmation.
11-06-2018 , 01:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andro
At what time can we expect the results to start coming? Like when the first races close for voting at 6 pm ET, at what time can we expect to know with decent certainty who won those?
The insider trick in Virginia is to watch chesterfield county. It's a large conservative leaning bellwether that typically reports most precincts very shortly after polls close at 7. If it's close or D leaning, Kaine is a lock and results will likely be good for dems statewide. It's also a big chunk of the 7th district, so if Spanberger is winning by more than 5 she has a good shot at taking down Dave Brat, which would bode well for House dems broadly and wealthy suburban battlegrounds specifically.
11-06-2018 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmakin
For california it could be weeks
Quote:
Originally Posted by LKJ
I have a hard time believing that we'll know the result of Indiana Senate in the first hour given how close the polling has been and given that some precincts will still be open during that first hour.

With Kentucky not having early voting, I'd be surprised if they could make a really quick call in KY-06 too, and if they do then I fear it would be bad news.

We could easily see strong signs in that first hour, but I doubt we get to "decent certainty" until at least the next set of states opens.


I guess it will be a long night then.

I just hope we get to see Ted Cruz crying after he loses to BETO.
11-06-2018 , 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by forum ferret
In before merge. Much better than Riverman's.
I’m not going to merge because that would push the op below the older posts i think. Good Job on the Op, Op.
11-06-2018 , 01:22 PM
Is the Georgia governor election the only election of Senate/House/Governors where there is a run-off if no candidate reaches 50%+? I just googled and it seems like it, but maybe there's more
11-06-2018 , 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatal Checkraise
Is the Georgia governor election the only election of Senate/House/Governors where there is a run-off if no candidate reaches 50%+? I just googled and it seems like it, but maybe there's more
Mississippi Senate
11-06-2018 , 01:24 PM


I've been hoping on IN-09 as being a potential upset, but if liberal Monroe County isn't turning out big (and someone in another thread said he had no wait in Bloomington) then it's tough to see that panning out. Tweet is from someone writing for the IU student newspaper, but it's mundane and specific enough to guess that he's getting an accurate number.
11-06-2018 , 01:26 PM
My mother just voted, Long Island. Poll worker told her turnout is higher than 2016 so far.
11-06-2018 , 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LKJ


I've been hoping on IN-09 as being a potential upset, but if liberal Monroe County isn't turning out big (and someone in another thread said he had no wait in Bloomington) then it's tough to see that panning out. Tweet is from someone writing for the IU student newspaper, but it's mundane and specific enough to guess that he's getting an accurate number.
If I may boost your spirits, that county had 27,107 total votes cast in 2014 (the last midterm).

https://www.in.gov/sos/elections/201...on_Turnout.pdf
11-06-2018 , 01:39 PM
What would be considered good turnout for a midterm? Google tells me 40% is average
11-06-2018 , 01:39 PM
The question given these huge numbers is:

Are we seeing a blue wave? Or mass election rigging by deplorables?
11-06-2018 , 01:41 PM
Grunch, is there an actual chance of Dem House & Senate? I see PredictIt has it at about ~15%. Volunteered this morning for 3 hours.
11-06-2018 , 01:42 PM
Gonna be a lot of tears.


https://twitter.com/williamjordann/s...207838211?s=19
11-06-2018 , 01:42 PM
Slim chance but a strong enough blue wave can make it happen.

Something like that would certainly restore my faith in the American people.
11-06-2018 , 01:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWetzel
If I may boost your spirits, that county had 27,107 total votes cast in 2014 (the last midterm).

https://www.in.gov/sos/elections/201...on_Turnout.pdf
Ah, that's good info, thanks. I guess with a baseline national average of ~40% at midterms, I was expecting that they were only turning out at slightly above average by 6:00.

Aside from the clear first-hour battlegrounds of Indiana Senate and KY-06, it does seem like IN-09 is the distant third option of something to follow during the first set of closings. 538 does give Liz Watson a 16.7% chance, though it's an awfully red district.
11-06-2018 , 01:44 PM
I don't know how long it takes to fill up a ballot, but the amount of **** you guys 'need' to vote on is ridiculous.
Just driving around NC this week and seeing the amount of signs is enough to know the system is ****ed. There's no way any civilian should be voting on Sheriff, DA or Judges or 90% of the **** in there.

It's hard enough to vote for Senators, house rep and governor.

      
m