Quote:
An earlier round of this came in late December, when AT&T announced it was paying out a $1,000 holiday bonus to its employees and attributed the decision to the GOP tax bill.
AT&T, like other telecommunications companies, has received some significant regulatory favors from the Trump administration in the form of new rules rescinding net neutrality regulation and allowing internet service providers to sell users’ web browsing data. They’re also struggling to gain regulatory approval for a proposed merger with Time Warner. Their framing of the bonus as a tax bill payoff was immediately hailed by GOP politicians, and they were swiftly followed by Comcast and two major banks.
Now, if you stop to think about it for a moment, it’s pretty clear that Donald Trump did not invent the practice of the corporate holiday bonus in December 2017. Indeed, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, about a quarter of private sector workers got a “holiday,” “year-end,” or “cash profit-sharing” bonus back in 2016:
It will take months for the data to become available to assess whether more bonuses were actually paid in 2017 than in 2016. And even if they were, there’d be no particular reason to think bonuses were paid because of the tax law. But the political upside to companies in regulated industries saying that whatever bonuses they are paying for whatever reason were due to the tax law is pretty clear.
By contrast, back in March 2016, when Comcast agreed to an across-the-board 2 to 3 percent pay raise with 10 months of retroactive back pay, it didn’t see any particular political upside in showering the Obama administration with praise.
And that's the truth of the matter. It'll take a while to see if or what the economic impact of the bill is, but Trump signaled to CEOs that if they want favorable treatment or to avoid harsh treatment they need to pay fidelity to him and they are. So we get corporate announcements about how the tax bill, Trump's signature achievement, has done X or Y good thing.
Quote:
Companies could choose to lobby quietly for Republican policies they like without overtly entering the fray in this way — executives loved Bush’s tax cuts too but didn’t spend the mid-aughts sending out an endless stream of press releases crediting the president with every new hire and every raise.
By engaging in this way, they are perhaps marginally increasing the likelihood of receiving favorable treatment from the White House. But they are also spurring the ongoing radicalization of Democratic Party elites. Under both Obama and Clinton, Democrats saw themselves as essentially performing a balancing act between a range of legitimate interests — including big business.
....
But that’s starting to change. Late last year, a Democratic senator who told me he thinks his caucus is getting pulled too far to the left also casually mentioned that a government takeover of the entire broadband and cable industry might be a good idea. And the Democrats who actually think of themselves as left-wing are thinking bigger than that.
As well they should. If companies want to throw their hat in with Trump, Democrats shouldn't welcome them back in when they're in power.
https://www.vox.com/explainers/2018/...ions-explained