Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
It is hard to believe that this description is all there is to it. Especially the "just to accumulate a little more money" part.
It's not. There's been a consistent push to invert the values in the Republican Party. You here a bit of it when they talk about needing reward the most productive people in society. Instead of centering on the hard work and sacrifice of the average person or focusing on how the poorest are treated, the entrepreneur and the wealthy are the center of the moral economy because they are the most productive and therefor the most important people in society. You see with Tyler Cowen posts about how the most moral time was the Gilded Age when there was no safety net and lots of immigration because the sanctity of private property and the Lochner primacy of private contacts or posts how focusing on growth should be the only goal of the US government and implicitly getting rid of non growth things like caring for the poor and old, etc.
You see it in so many Republicans lauding Ayn Rand as a moralist. Her primary morality being that great men are held back by bureaucrats, rules and laws, and wealth and selfishness are intrinsic goods.
You see it in Hayek saying that in order to progress we need independently and generational wealth so that the landed elite can invent and experiment without the need to work.
Of course we see it as inflicting misery on the weak and old but they see it as moving wealth from less productive sectors of the economy to more productive sectors and therefor increasing growth which ultimately gives more overall wealth and therefor is the most moral thing they can do.
If you were to ask Paul Ryan if he thought that axing Social Security and cutting taxes for the rich by the equal amount was one of the most moral things he could do and you swore that you'd never tell a soul, he'd probably say yes and not have any reservations.
Last edited by Huehuecoyotl; 12-01-2017 at 11:27 PM.