Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
2016 Presidential Election Thread: TRUMP vs. Hillary SMACKDOWN 2016 Presidential Election Thread: TRUMP vs. Hillary SMACKDOWN
View Poll Results: The 45th President of the United States of America will be
Hillary
332 46.63%
TRUMP
190 26.69%
In to watch it burn
161 22.61%
Bastard
73 10.25%
im tryin to tell you about ****in my wife in the *** and youre asking me these personal questions
57 8.01%

09-12-2016 , 11:57 AM
and everyone is a criminal technically.
09-12-2016 , 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Exactly. You all have lost your minds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Finally we have the guts to vote for a leader that will call the enemy by its real name, radical islambuckets of deplorable, although some if them are nice people. I thought "stronger together" was more effective. Maybe not for winning the job but certainly for governing.
hahahaha, all the "HE JUST WONT SAY RADICAL ISLAM" comments aside, it's cute that you talk about governing when your party is the one that obstructs actual governance at every conceivable moment. oh wait, that is unless said governance involves marginalizing poor people and minorities, or gutting regulations for everything except public bathroom use.

saying you lost your mind would be giving you credit for even having half a brain to begin with
09-12-2016 , 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PFunkaliscious
c'mon. let's be real. You don't know what you are. You just know that if there is a large enough crowd, you are going to follow it.
Like I said, with the exception of Kedu your type gave up trying to engage in favor of childish trolling a long time ago.
09-12-2016 , 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
TRUMP wants no moderators at debate. Just wants to "sit and talk" with Clinton. That seems like it would work out fine. He scared.

http://www.salon.com/2016/09/12/trum...ng-moderators/
I think debates would be more entertaining if there was a moderator to enforce time limits, but candidates themselves ask and answer questions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rafiki
Alex Wice licking his chops this morning. Man what a huge moment in all this. Just saw the faint video, it looks real real bad.
Let's hope she stays on the ballot. Plus as much as an love winning, I love the entertainment of the upcoming debate. Also I wouldn't want Trump to win by default, otherwise the country would be even more divided.

Btw a report for you guys: She has Parkinson's. The pneumo is because of difficulty swallowing. She's on dopamine agonists. You can see photos of Dr. Bardack administering neuro tests. When Assange comes out with something major (September 19th still the most likely drop date), the above will very likely be included as part of that.

Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk
09-12-2016 , 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarianceMinefield
ya next time the democrats should rig the DNC and all the media for someone who isnt dying and a criminal
What did the DNC do to rig the contest?
09-12-2016 , 12:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
What did the DNC do to rig the contest?
they forced 4M more people to vote for her than Bernie
09-12-2016 , 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016...voters-n643501

trump +19 among active military and veterans. 5 deferments from the draft during war time. trashing John McCain for being a pow in that same war while he was partying in NYC (sorry I mean dealing with his incredibly painful and debilitating foot spurs). attacking the Khan family. getting gifted a Purple Heart at a rally and proclaiming he's always wanted one. there's probably more but wtf did Hillary even do to turn these people off?

maybe they think Trump will legalize sexual assault or something
she was born a woman
09-12-2016 , 12:11 PM
lol Trumpies are getting super desperate clinging onto this miracle hope that Clinton drops unaware that any other Democrat wipes the floor with Trump.
09-12-2016 , 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
What did the DNC do to rig the contest?
Insisted on counting all the primary votes and adding them up to see who was the winner in each state.
09-12-2016 , 12:15 PM
09-12-2016 , 12:17 PM
I posted that earlier...stunning, stunning crassness as he watches 3000 people perish.
09-12-2016 , 12:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Wice
Btw a report for you guys: She has Parkinson's.
A+ hot take. Awice is like the steelhouse for the new generation.
09-12-2016 , 12:25 PM
Breaking: Mason has now locked his tax policy thread. But not before offering up Ayn Rand, In Defense of Selfishness as a response to this:



Also it came out that he's 65. Boomers man.
09-12-2016 , 12:27 PM
well the decision to close it was certainly better than the decision to start it.

ftr in this talk of boomers and gen xers and stuff what is mid 40's? Are we like the forgotten generation?
09-12-2016 , 12:27 PM
Man, I would have guessed Mason was deep into his late 70s.
09-12-2016 , 12:27 PM
And Brigadoon disappears back into the mist.



Start thread about politics. Ban all posts that don't share your terrible assumed premise. Demonstrate complete non-self-awareness about that at every turn. Sounds like an Ayn Rand fan to me.
09-12-2016 , 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
I like that these people are so ****ing conspiratorial they forgot that the video was their smoking gun of victory and now think Hillary fainting was a false flag lol

2p2 needs to do some better vetting of the mods.
lolpog has a hard time getting anyone to mod it so stronger vetting will lead to labor shortages
09-12-2016 , 12:29 PM
Do you think there's actually a decent chance Hillary could be replaced? I'm wondering about betting on her at odds of 1.64 (about -156 in American odds) and not sure if it's worth the risk.

Last edited by MultiTabling; 09-12-2016 at 12:34 PM. Reason: betting on her to become president
09-12-2016 , 12:31 PM
I posted twice in that thread. One in regards to why I believe Clinton is better for tax policy. It basically boils down to, Trump's tax plan reduces taxes on the 1% primarily. By simple math, 99% of poker players won't benefit from this. Even if you assume that poker players are five times more likely to become rich than the average person (probably not true), it still only benefits 5% of poker players. Clinton's tax plan involves increasing taxes on the 1% to fund university education, which is something that many poker players, their families, and their communities in general would benefit from. Even though my post was DIRECTLY about tax policy and why Clinton is better, it seems to have been deleted from the thread.
09-12-2016 , 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
And Brigadoon disappears back into the mist.



Start thread about politics. Ban all posts that don't share your terrible assumed premise. Demonstrate complete non-self-awareness about that at every turn. Sounds like an Ayn Rand fan to me.
Poor Mason, why did nobody answer his question???
09-12-2016 , 12:35 PM
My god, being an Ayn Rand fan at 65 sounds like a special kind of hell. Is there some kind of charity for these people? I feel like I should do something.
09-12-2016 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MultiTabling
Do you think there's actually a decent chance Hillary could be replaced? I'm wondering about betting on her at odds of 1.64 (about -156 in American odds) and not sure if it's worth the risk.

Dvaut posted ITT and made a pretty compelling case that replacing her at this date is nearly impossible short of death due to the messy state by state ballot process.
What is the spread between Clinton wins versus Dem wins? That would provide some interesting market data.
09-12-2016 , 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
Reminds me of this thread 4 years ago. I called MM out on his BS back then, and even linked to a thread that just got bumped in this forum as evidence for his BS.

ETA: Start at post #308.
Lol that thread. Complete lack of accountability. Notice the die-hards like renodoc hanging on until the end, making excuses.
09-12-2016 , 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Wice
Btw a report for you guys: She has Parkinson's. The pneumo is because of difficulty swallowing. She's on dopamine agonists. You can see photos of Dr. Bardack administering neuro tests. When Assange comes out with something major (September 19th still the most likely drop date), the above will very likely be included as part of that.
Here's a Trump report for you: He met secretly with Putin over the weekend. Absolutely no difficulty swallowing.
09-12-2016 , 12:41 PM
While we are busy freaking out about a human being who's campaigning relentlessly 24/7 getting sick (this changes EVERYTHING!!!!!!) it seems like some real issues are getting uncovered and it's just getting completely ignored for the most part:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...b62_story.html
Quote:
Donald Trump was in a tuxedo, standing next to his award: a statue of a palm tree, as tall as a toddler. It was 2010, and Trump was being honored by a charity — the Palm Beach Police Foundation — for his “selfless support” of its cause.

His support did not include any of his own money.

Instead, Trump had found a way to give away somebody else’s money and claim the credit for himself.

Trump had earlier gone to a charity in New Jersey — the Charles Evans Foundation, named for a deceased businessman — and asked for a donation. Trump said he was raising money for the Palm Beach Police Foundation.

The Evans Foundation said yes. In 2009 and 2010, it gave a total of $150,000 to the Donald J. Trump Foundation, a small charity that the Republican presidential nominee founded in 1987.

Then, Trump’s foundation turned around and made donations to the police group in South Florida. In those years, the Trump Foundation’s gifts totaled $150,000.

Trump had effectively turned the Evans Foundation’s gifts into his own gifts, without adding any money of his own.

On the night that he won the Palm Tree Award for his philanthropy, Trump may have actually made money. The gala was held at his Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, and the police foundation paid to rent the room. It’s unclear how much was paid in 2010, but the police foundation reported in its tax filings that it rented Mar-a-Lago in 2014 for $276,463.

The Donald J. Trump Foundation is not like other charities. An investigation of the foundation — including examinations of 17 years of tax filings and interviews with more than 200 individuals or groups listed as donors or beneficiaries — found that it collects and spends money in a very unusual manner.

For one thing, nearly all of its money comes from people other than Trump. In tax records, the last gift from Trump was in 2008. Since then, all of the donations have been other people’s money — an arrangement that experts say is almost unheard of for a family foundation.

Trump then takes that money and generally does with it as he pleases. In many cases, he passes it on to other charities, which often are under the impression that it is Trump’s own money.

In two cases, he has used money from his charity to buy himself a gift. In one of those cases — not previously reported — Trump spent $20,000 of money earmarked for charitable purposes to buy a six-foot-tall painting of himself.

Money from the Trump Foundation has also been used for political purposes, which is against the law. The Washington Post reported this month that Trump paid a penalty this year to the Internal Revenue Service for a 2013 donation in which the foundation gave $25,000 to a campaign group affiliated with Florida Attorney General Pamela Bondi (R).

      
m