He wouldn't want President Hillary or a judge assassinated. But there is no doubt it was what his comment pertained to. He made the comment because that's how his mind works. After saying "there is nothing you can do" it occurred to him that these nutty second amendment people actually could do something. Since he has no filter he just comes out with this stupid inappropriate joke.

I know that many of you get annoyed at me because you think I profess an expertise I don't have in various subjects. Does that include stupid inappropriate jokes? Didn't think so.

Reagan calling Dukakis an invalid when he couldn't remember what he had for breakfast is pretty ridiculous.

Wikileaks reminds me of when Homer Simpson started a news website. They broke a few good stories once, now they make up bull**** to stay relevant.

Yep. 3 things stood out:
1) Dukakis seems like he's still in good condition (assuming his footage is recent) more than 30 years later. It's ridiculous that Reagan would slam him on any health-related issue. (Although it does go nicely with his line from a Mondale debate: "I want you to know that also I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent's youth and inexperience."

2) Seems the Dukakis camp was just not good, and they weren't prepared for any of the attacks/criticisms from the Bush campaign. Dukakis basically says, "Clinton got exactly the same degree of attacks that we got, but his campaign was effective at anticipating and responding to them. We weren't."

3) Dukakis had a decent lead before the conventions before getting wafflecrushed.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...ng-much-worse/

"Is it possible that Trump is being treated unfairly, that we jump on every little thing he says and twist his words, making a big deal out of nothing? Sure it is. That has happened before. But in this case, the criticisms are legitimate, because this isn’t just a silly “gaffe” of the kind we waste so much time on."

Current NY Post top headline: Malia Obama appears to be smoking pot at Lollapalooza

Conservative media with finger on the pulse of the nation as always.

Interesting OPED by William Galston in today's WSJ. On the GOP talking point that this is a "Change Election". Per latest WSJ/NBC poll, Trump leads 48% to 26% as the candidate better suited to change business as usual in Washington. However, Clinton leads 42% to 36% as the candidate more likely to change the country for the better.

Galston points out that in a Change Election a candidate must do two things. He must convince voters he can bring about change. And he must convince voters that change will be for the better. Trump has done the former but failed miserably in the latter. While 77% believe Trump would change the way things work in Washington, 44% of those believe he would change things for the worse.

PairTheBoard

What is with the super right leaning ad's all over 2p2?

I actually agree with this.

Don't encourage him.

Trump's hardcore supporters are convinced that their very way of life is under attack. Am I wrong to fear what happens after Trump gets blown out and they realize they don't have the numbers to MAGI by conventional means?

they can find second amendment solutions

Lol at how you need to account for ageing because the photo they found of some doctor is 15 years old.

They didn't even go to the ****ing effort of tracking down and visiting the guy.

Or when he "accidentally" held up a picture of a 12 year old Chelsea Clinton 3 days after the election as a picture of the "new White House dog".

Meaning vote the bums out of course!

And by this you obviously mean "use the motivation to coalesce around a common goal and work through our current political system to achieve their political objectives", right?

Actually, you are doing it terribly.

Trump support dropping among Republican women

But never fear, there are still Trumpkins to UNSKEWWWWWW this negative omen:

How do you still keep using that word wrong after being corrected dozens of times?

Don't worry. Trump has got the female voters perfectly set up with some solid negs, now he just needs to ease in some kino and they'll be eating out of his hand. It worked with Ivanka.

Do you have the quotes?

As recently as last week, I read Assange saying he wasn't trying to influence the election one way or the other, but that he did think HRC and the DNC showed troublesome practices.

I'm not saying JA is or isn't trying to push one side for the election, but just that I've read him as saying that he's not and don't have quotes from him otherwise.

Would gladly stand corrected if I'm just ignorant/wrong. I'm just as curious as anybody else on this corruption stuff and politics - although, I have some issues with Wikileaks as an entity and wonder if I should support anything they do (out of principle).

jmallflush looking pretty wolfy here

The man in red on CNN: "I can't believe he said it...take him out to the shed...he was making a joke." Darrell Vickers. He will be voting for Trump.

Even Dilbert is practically throwing in the towel on the Trump train.

Trump right now actually going with the, "You heard what Hillary said when she said she's going to raise taxes on the middle class. It was pretty clear" bit.

Dumb as hell RW blogs and videos now an actual part of a Republican nominee's rally speeches. She said "we aren't going to raise taxes...". Why did I even type that? Why is this a thing? Just totally making things up.