His point is why be selective cus it seems unnecessary
Very great Analysis btw weird chess
And my point is that if he wants to ignore 17 years worth of data because he thinks it will change to go right ahead. You're too ****ing stupid to see that though.
And my point is that if he wants to ignore 17 years worth of data because he thinks it will change to go right ahead. You're too ****ing stupid to see that though.
Chill out
I understand both sides
I think his counterpoints make sense , and would guess they are correct
I don't think Tebow sucks nearly as bad as people seem to think. Michael Vick used to be the worst passer in the league, but people realized his mobility made him dangerous. In fact, he was vastly overrated at the time (like most mobile QBs).
So Tebow does suck at throwing, but it seems he can do some things which can help his team win. I am not saying he is good, but this idea that he is just flat out terrible and should lose every game appears to be based on faulty logic. Again, I am not saying he is good.
I also need the Eagles to win in order to manage a profit. I'm a little scared. I don't think the Eagles should be such big favorites. I may just hedge.