Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread

11-15-2010 , 04:03 PM
Post Oak would advise putting them in the same teaser.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-15-2010 , 04:07 PM
eurocup is starting tho. allen iverson gonna represent
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-15-2010 , 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsigley
allen iverson gonna represent
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exOxUAntx8I
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-15-2010 , 05:50 PM
thank you for mentioning the Titans Thremp. I was kind of sad face this morning about not doing the 6.5 pt ones with the Broncos. But, now I see the ones I stupidly missed were .500 and it's party time.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-16-2010 , 12:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by That Foreign Guy
Only in the most basic terms - each point is worth a certain amount of cover %, you need the multiplied cover %s of the two games to be greater than the break even percentage given the odds you're getting.

I'm not sure how to deal with the shaded lines on Pinny part of the equation though. Do I assume the shading is on the original (pre-tease) lines and that I adjust the cover % there (so instead of covering -3 50% of the time a team that is -3 -130 covers 52% or whatever) then add the value of each point?
Then why not use Pinny's drop down and calculate from there? Not ideal for all lines obv but it should get you pretty close.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 04:09 PM
Bears +7.5
Steelers -1.5
Jets -1
Titans -1
Browns +7.5


How does that look? Only gonna tease the ones including the Bears today.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 04:19 PM
Chiefs -2?
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 04:32 PM
I only have money on BetJamaica (probably should get money on a few other books) right now and they have it at -3 right now. Where is it at -2?
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
I only have money on BetJamaica (probably should get money on a few other books) right now and they have it at -3 right now. Where is it at -2?
Bodog.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 05:10 PM
I had Chiefs at -2 earlier in the week on legends, I have not logged in since Tuesday though.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pwn_Master
Bodog.
Ah.



And Bears just went to +8.5.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 08:05 PM
Say you're looking to clear a bonus so looking for closest to 0ev you can find. What's the approximate house edge on a two-team teaser where both teams are -7.5 market but +100 teaser gives -2 each game?
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 08:52 PM
A true 7.5 is still +EV for the player at -2
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 09:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by atrainpsu
A true 7.5 is still +EV for the player at -2
Cool thank you
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by atrainpsu
A true 7.5 is still +EV for the player at -2
By "true" do you mean a -110 2 team teaser?
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-18-2010 , 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
By "true" do you mean a -110 2 team teaser?
Think he means a team that is -7.5 -110 as opposed to -7.5 +104.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-19-2010 , 01:01 AM
I read it as he is saying +100 5.5 pt teasers are +EV.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-19-2010 , 11:52 AM
Locked into a lot of 3 and 4 teamers after last night. Ill probably hedge last minute like a little girl though.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-19-2010 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
By "true" do you mean a -110 2 team teaser?
No

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa!
Think he means a team that is -7.5 -110 as opposed to -7.5 +104.
This, basically.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PICKAPEPPA
I read it as he is saying +100 5.5 pt teasers are +EV.
Reasonably true, as long as you cross the 3 and 7. I probably wouldn't do -8.5 to -3, or +1.5 to +7.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-20-2010 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by atrainpsu
Reasonably true, as long as you cross the 3 and 7. I probably wouldn't do -8.5 to -3, or +1.5 to +7.
Thanks. Is the breakeven between -105 and -110?
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-21-2010 , 05:39 PM
Ahh, would won 15X more $ if Titans had covered -1.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-21-2010 , 06:23 PM
Same here. Slight loser due to middle bet.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-21-2010 , 06:42 PM
Damn you Titans. Won a tiny bit bc I didn't RR TEN in my CHI teasers.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-21-2010 , 07:09 PM
Titans have ****ed with teasers all year........I not sending Jeff Fisher a xmas card
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
11-22-2010 , 12:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
Ahh, would won 15X more $ if Titans had covered -1.
yep

5 of 6 NFL legs = small gain

so close to a "make it rain" moment
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote

      
m