any1 help me with this question please. given the high variance nature of this, is it better to bet only 3 and 4 teamers, or bet the 2 teamers as well even at -110.
say my roll is 15k.
what % of roll would you bet on weeks with:
2 teams only
3 teams
4 teams
5 teams
6 teams
sorry if i am doing this wong but how the fvck do you half kelly 30 or so semi dependent parlays. can some1 tell me the accepted EV. i believe my 2% for -110's and 5% for +180's and +300's are about right but a little conservative?
any1 help me with this question please. given the high variance nature of this, is it better to bet only 3 and 4 teamers, or bet the 2 teamers as well even at -110.
say my roll is 15k.
what % of roll would you bet on weeks with:
2 teams only
3 teams
4 teams
5 teams
6 teams
sorry if i am doing this wong but how the fvck do you half kelly 30 or so semi dependent parlays. can some1 tell me the accepted EV. i believe my 2% for -110's and 5% for +180's and +300's are about right but a little conservative?
thanks
A 5% half kelly BR bet needs a 20% edge for +180. Which would never happen.
thanks for the pdf. a little heavy but do-able. just wondering how this works for betting the same teams many times in different combos and different odds. BTW, sorry my post was confusing but i meant 2% BR on all 2 teamers and 5% BR on all +180 and 5% BR on all +300. guess that's too much then. obviously i got a lot to learn.
What killed you, sd and atl? Atl hurt me. I actually had phi -7.5 +215 in confirmation stage just to hedge a little bit because I put atl in so many teasers at +9. Then I thought nahhh hedging is for girls
week 1 3 point favorites lost by 17
week 2 4.5 dogs won by 4
week 3 7 point dogs lost by 1
week 5 1 point favorites lost by 23
only one that didn't cover was omaha against las vegas. omaha was 3.5 dogs lost by 12 though i remember something ridiculous happening like fumbling near the goal line early in the game and then getting stopped on 4th down half a yard short