Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread

10-17-2010 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daliman
I really, sincerely, and truly hope you win all of your teases.
Well, thanks.

You bet the same ones or something?
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-17-2010 , 03:51 PM
Do teasers ever win?
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-17-2010 , 04:04 PM
ugh chargers
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-17-2010 , 04:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by calm
Do teasers ever win?
Nothing I back wins. The future is here.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-17-2010 , 11:06 PM
bad day for me - did any1 do ok?

any1 help me with this question please. given the high variance nature of this, is it better to bet only 3 and 4 teamers, or bet the 2 teamers as well even at -110.

say my roll is 15k.
what % of roll would you bet on weeks with:
2 teams only
3 teams
4 teams
5 teams
6 teams
sorry if i am doing this wong but how the fvck do you half kelly 30 or so semi dependent parlays. can some1 tell me the accepted EV. i believe my 2% for -110's and 5% for +180's and +300's are about right but a little conservative?

thanks
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-17-2010 , 11:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by subz
bad day for me - did any1 do ok?

any1 help me with this question please. given the high variance nature of this, is it better to bet only 3 and 4 teamers, or bet the 2 teamers as well even at -110.

say my roll is 15k.
what % of roll would you bet on weeks with:
2 teams only
3 teams
4 teams
5 teams
6 teams
sorry if i am doing this wong but how the fvck do you half kelly 30 or so semi dependent parlays. can some1 tell me the accepted EV. i believe my 2% for -110's and 5% for +180's and +300's are about right but a little conservative?

thanks
A 5% half kelly BR bet needs a 20% edge for +180. Which would never happen.

This might help if math is your thing. http://www.bjmath.com/bjmath/thorp/ch6.pdf
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-17-2010 , 11:53 PM
i did ok bc i woke up late and only played a DAL/JAX/SF, although final outcome is still pending.

would have hated the chargers.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-18-2010 , 09:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjornb
A 5% half kelly BR bet needs a 20% edge for +180. Which would never happen.

This might help if math is your thing. http://www.bjmath.com/bjmath/thorp/ch6.pdf
thanks for the pdf. a little heavy but do-able. just wondering how this works for betting the same teams many times in different combos and different odds. BTW, sorry my post was confusing but i meant 2% BR on all 2 teamers and 5% BR on all +180 and 5% BR on all +300. guess that's too much then. obviously i got a lot to learn.

many thanks.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-18-2010 , 08:28 PM
for any1 who is interested i have found this which is very useful - to me anyway.

http://video.sbrforum.com/video-8030...-strategy.html
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-19-2010 , 12:13 AM
death death death

the lord giveth and the lord taketh away
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-19-2010 , 12:35 AM
saw some discussion on how to size teasers, found this chart pretty useful. Been using it for the past couple years, thanks shipit!

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/40...6/#post6151808

not that it matters since all BST's/shaded 3's/good 6.5's blah blah blah never win anyway
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-19-2010 , 08:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyTurn2Raise
death death death

the lord giveth and the lord taketh away
Yep. Bodog hung atl +3 -150 for about 10 minutes and I put them in almost every 3 and 4 teamer
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-19-2010 , 07:54 PM
i lost six digits on teasers last wknd, it hurts like hell
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-19-2010 , 09:35 PM
pure pain
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 03:06 PM
What killed you, sd and atl? Atl hurt me. I actually had phi -7.5 +215 in confirmation stage just to hedge a little bit because I put atl in so many teasers at +9. Then I thought nahhh hedging is for girls
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 03:53 PM
I got so hammered on Saturday I missed getting any bets in. I run good.
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjornb
I got so hammered on Saturday I missed getting any bets in. I run good.
same
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 05:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjornb
I got so hammered on Saturday I missed getting any bets in. I run good.
I got the bets in then got hammered on Sunday to kill the pain
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 05:40 PM
i've been throwing in UFL underdogs to all teasers looking good

9-1 so far
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 05:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsigley
i've been throwing in UFL underdogs to all teasers looking good

9-1 so far
zomg are u crazy, they don't all cross the 3 and the 7!
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 06:33 PM
i know but i might lay off today so much steam coming in on florida on already the highest spread in history
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 06:39 PM
haha the tuskers are a force to be reckoned with
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 06:43 PM
Sacramento has lost games by 17 and 23, I'm guessing dogs are 8-2 unless this isn't the highest spread in UFL History?
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 06:54 PM
they were actually favorites in those 2 games

week 1 3 point favorites lost by 17
week 2 4.5 dogs won by 4
week 3 7 point dogs lost by 1
week 5 1 point favorites lost by 23

only one that didn't cover was omaha against las vegas. omaha was 3.5 dogs lost by 12 though i remember something ridiculous happening like fumbling near the goal line early in the game and then getting stopped on 4th down half a yard short
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote
10-21-2010 , 10:33 PM
of course sac wins outright as 10 point dogs
Wong Teasers Basic Strategy Discussion Thread Quote

      
m