actually been answered in the thread like 10x already tho

despite your snootinezz.....i like your picture.......Cows with their tongues out are l0lz

Read the FAQ that was posted in the thread. I'm helpful to a certain point, but you aren't even trying to figure this stuff out on your own.

An experienced troll should make this an advanced level troll, in which they give blatantly wrong advice to questions like these, but use great detail and make it sound plausible.............could be fun.

ok sorry guys,

but i did read the whole thread before posting and just now the faq the first dumb questions were in the faqs

the sweetheart teaser question i didnt find here or on google

ill go banish myself to the corner now

is 0 between -7 and +3?

I've teased through the zero many times before...

How many times? As many times as Jack Klumpas has ridden in a Cadillac?

There's a section on crossing the 0 (teasing from -3.5 to +3.5) in NFL Teasers for Advanced Players.

Did you read the first page of the thread?

share ricebowl plz

If sum of push% of extra points + implied win% > breakeven single leg win%, then fire away...

bah... making me do my own work

do you have proprietary push chart? Or, do you just use SBR?

Math is hard

did daliman cover sites that don't include overtime in their spread bets? would the 0 be more profitable at such sites?

gotta love books that let you cancel 25 teasers when the lines have changed out of your favour for all games. ill try this again sunday morning i suppose

No, didn't know that they existed, and no, they wouldn't be, even if they did.

That's your office? My cup better go jingle when you pass by tomorrow.

haha.....i used to issue physical challenges to panhandlers in order to earn their mobniez, that is, until I got pwned one time by a freakishly strong homeless person

lolwut? The 0 would obviously be more profitable. However the 3 and the 6 would be less profitable. And the majority of the profit from the 0 would come at the loss of the 3s, meaning a tease from the -3.5 to the +3.5 would likely show no increase in profitability. So the correct answer is yes the 0 is worth more, but it probably doesnt matter, and the value of the basic tease across the 3 and 6 is likely to lose value at said books.

On a related note, crap sandwiches would taste better with mustard, but they're still crap sandwiches, which no one makes anyway. The reason Wongs are profitable isn't just because they cover the 3 and the 7; it's also because you get the 4 and the 6, which I'm pretty sure are the #3 and #4 most common margin of victory. If with the 3 and 7 you for some odd reason got the 1 and 0, as well as the 5, they'd suck and be little different than any other tease. The 0 is next to worthless, 1 and 2 suck also. Anyone that wants to pay -130 to go from 3.5 to 3.5 through the 0 can book with me.

I haven't been around for awhile, but aren't you supposed to be smarter than this, shipit?

Why would I do that when I can get -105 commonly?

You get -105 on 7 pointers? Jeez, that might actually make going through the 0 profitable. Hell, any tease at all, for that matter. Go through the 12 and the 18 at that rate.

Meh. Books play games, sometimes they bad at them.