Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register

04-24-2009 , 09:51 PM
Fu Jerry,

This board is for gambling not math class. All that junk tells me is you are just a geek who doesn't understand how to bet sports. TomG found a great way to to bet a little and win a lot and you are just jealous.
Quote
04-24-2009 , 09:59 PM
Actually, he found a way to bet a lot to win a little (2 units to win .58 or .15)

That's if he doesn't lose both, which as it sits now, he will.

Why are you so blindly buying into this? 7 games in, and he's already venturing away from what his "system" recommends.

Just my opinion. I'm here to improve my methods of making money just like everyone else.
Quote
04-24-2009 , 10:02 PM
1) Obv I was talking about the basic idea, not the one off modification.

2) You got to spend money to make money. And this will make money. Anybody who knows anything knows the Rangers scoring will be wild.
Quote
04-24-2009 , 10:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomG
Friday (2 Plays)
1 Unit on Texas Rangers -2˝ +258 (5Dimes)
1 Unit on Baltimore Orioles -2˝ +215 (Greek)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJLTNYK
I might piss myself if I come home and see either the Rangers or Orioles won by 1 or 2.
Final

Tex 5
Balt 4



Quote:
Originally Posted by Fusilli Jerry
Actually, he found a way to bet a lot to win a little (2 units to win .58 or .15)
The above is incorrect.

If he hits one side, the win is 1.58 or 1.15

Last edited by Sevenfold; 04-24-2009 at 10:23 PM.
Quote
04-24-2009 , 10:33 PM
Better luck tomorrow.
Quote
04-24-2009 , 10:34 PM
I am like 95% sure at least one of the posters I think is leveling itt isn't actually leveling.
Quote
04-24-2009 , 10:40 PM
All my posts have been sarcastic, except the one when I started the "Fade the Texas Rangers 2 1/2 system" which would be awesome if it could be done.

EDIT: if you thought I wasn't really lvling
Quote
04-24-2009 , 10:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fusilli Jerry
LOL at those who can't figure out how to use the interwebs and resort to making these kind of posts about 5 pages that always resort in an epic fail, when the thread is clearly still on the first page for anyone with a brain
FYP
Quote
04-24-2009 , 11:45 PM
"Slump? I ain't in no slump! I just ain't hitting." -- Yogi Berra

Updated YTD: 0-8, -9.0 units, 9 units wagered, -100% ROI

Back tomorrow with Saturday's play(s).
Quote
04-25-2009 , 12:32 AM
Next game is Feldman V Hendrickson at SP. Avg WHIP of over 2.00! Great game to Martingale! Gonna win all those credits back and more!!! Let's GOGOGOGO
Quote
04-25-2009 , 01:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loosekanen
Next game is Feldman V Hendrickson at SP. Avg WHIP of over 2.00! Great game to Martingale! Gonna win all those credits back and more!!! Let's GOGOGOGO
suprised it took this many posts for someone mention martingale.
Quote
04-25-2009 , 01:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomG
"Slump? I ain't in no slump! I just ain't hitting." -- Yogi Berra

Updated YTD: 0-8, -9.0 units, 9 units wagered, -100% ROI

Back tomorrow with Saturday's play(s).
Your local bartender slash bookie must be trying damn hard to hide a grin every time you enter the joint
Quote
04-25-2009 , 04:54 AM
[x] thread delivers
Quote
04-25-2009 , 05:52 AM
this is awesome.
Quote
04-25-2009 , 06:05 AM
The only thing that doesn't win in this thread is the actual system.
Quote
04-25-2009 , 06:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomG
"Slump? I ain't in no slump! I just ain't hitting." -- Yogi Berra

Updated YTD: 0-8, -9.0 units, 9 units wagered, -100% ROI

Back tomorrow with Saturday's play(s).
Tell me I didn't jump ahead to see another failed system and I found another Chernobyl of systems?
Quote
04-25-2009 , 07:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlickMcFavorite
It's nice to finally find a forum where if you put yourself out there and try to discuss a system of wagering that tons of people will jump into your thread just to make fun of it. You would be suprised how rare that is. It makes this forum tops. I'm glad tha veterans of this forum are so helpfull. I would choose to ridicule too before offering any advice or discussing the topic like an adult. That's why this forum is here right? Either discuss the system properly or disregard there is no reason to go out of your way to make fun of someone.
Provide some quality systems? The fact is that systems are too mechanical and if they're any good will be exploited immediately. You want to make money betting bases? Find spots to oppose the big teams, if they're slumping then maybe you might find a spot to get on. No NY teams, No Cubs, Bosox, Dodgers etc.

Lets discuss systems in general. Then lets discuss systems we make public and how they'll continue to be +EV from this point forward ignoring any previous positive variance and allowing every piling on mother****er to jump in. Lets defend idiocy and lack of evidence, lets call our 22 all the way down the river even tho its hopeless...
Quote
04-25-2009 , 09:58 AM
Rangers -2.5 looks pretty +EV today.
Quote
04-25-2009 , 10:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBears
I am like 95% sure at least one of the posters I think is leveling itt isn't actually leveling.
It's not me is it?
Quote
04-25-2009 , 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmosphere
Rangers -2.5 looks pretty +EV today.
So is Baltimore -2.5!!! I'm expecting a crazy 10-2 type game, just not sure who wins.
Quote
04-25-2009 , 11:31 AM
come on folks, the downside has already hit
nothing but smooth sailing ahead

reversion to the mean FTMFW
Quote
04-25-2009 , 01:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PICKAPEPPA
This is one of those coded posts that reveals a great nugget on how to beat sports betting that every one talks about in this forum, right?
shhhhhh
Quote
04-25-2009 , 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaFossil
So is Baltimore -2.5!!! I'm expecting a crazy 10-2 type game, just not sure who wins.
If only there were a way to take advantage....
Quote
04-25-2009 , 02:39 PM
Let's take a moment to put things in perspective, folks.

Suppose this thread was instead the "Texas Rangers 1˝ System." You might think, "Hey, that's one less run to cover." Well, believe it or not, the Rangers 1˝ System would have the exact same record! What does this tell us?

The only difference between 1˝ and 2˝ is that sometimes teams win by 2. And this isn't happening! Therefore, we will continue to lay 2˝ runs (instead of switching to 1˝) on the Rangers knowing we are risking less to win more.

Using the same basic strategy as Friday's plays...

Saturday (2 Plays)
1 Unit on Texas Rangers -2˝ +210 (5Dimes)
1 Unit on Baltimore Orioles -2˝ +230 (Greek)
Quote
04-25-2009 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyTurn2Raise
come on folks, the downside has already hit
nothing but smooth sailing ahead

reversion to the mean FTMFW
Kurtosis + reversion to mean can't fail.

Sadly, the kurtosis has been in the other tail so far.
Quote

      
m