Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register

04-12-2011 , 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulebennett
100 to win 50
200 to win 100
400 to win 200
800 to win 400
1600 to win 800
3200 to win 1600

Yeah, they go on a six-game winning streak and you're suddenly betting $3,200 on a game.
That would be a sick sweat to have 3200 on a game if they were playing someone equally as bad with their 4th starter.
Quote
04-12-2011 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulebennett
100 to win 50
200 to win 100 Down 300
400 to win 200 600 to win 300
800 to win 400 1,800 to win 900
1600 to win 800 5,400 to win 2,700
3200 to win 1600 16,200 to win 8,100

Yeah, they go on a six-game winning streak and you're suddenly betting $3,200 on a game.
The above double up only gets back the last bet, not all the bets before. The bolded edit shows the break even bets. Just to break even we are actually betting ~16K.

If we want to profit $100 after our bets, which is the goal of progressive betting systems, then it gets even worse.

200 to win 100 (-200)

600 to win 300 (-800)

1,800 to win 900 (-2,600)

5,400 to win 2,700 (-7K)

14.2K to win 7.1K (-21.2K)

42.6K to win 21.3K

So if the Pirates win 5 straight against you, you will either be +100 or down ~64K after that 6th game.

Funsies.

Last edited by Sevenfold; 04-12-2011 at 01:53 PM.
Quote
04-12-2011 , 01:46 PM
Yeah, my bad. Thanks for correcting that. It gets ugly quick.
Quote
07-14-2011 , 02:31 AM
bump for epicnesss....winner winner chicken dinner!
Quote
07-14-2011 , 02:54 AM
shaaadup.
Quote
07-14-2011 , 07:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NajdorfDefense
G doesn't get nearly enough credit for creating one of the alltime epic troll threads. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
What thread you talking about? his "well"?
Quote
07-15-2011 , 07:15 PM
ROASTED!
Quote
04-09-2012 , 04:30 PM
Quote
04-09-2012 , 04:39 PM
Quote
04-09-2012 , 05:29 PM
I'm hoppin on this bandwagon at least for the Darvish
Quote
04-09-2012 , 11:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle Bluntson
I'm hoppin on this bandwagon at least for the Darvish
looks good so far!
Quote
04-09-2012 , 11:15 PM
did I say Darvish.. I mistyped and meant Texas's ability to score runs
Quote
04-09-2012 , 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by n00b590
BOOM!

Let's keep the ball rolling...

Quote
04-14-2012 , 10:55 AM
Bet-sizing FTL. YTD: 1-1 -1200

Royal Bluntson - Darvish bandwagon, let's do it!

Quote
04-16-2012 , 07:30 PM
Damn wish I read this thread more.

I'm all over it next time.. Let's hop on the Yankees -2.5 System as well and break the bank baby
Quote
04-19-2012 , 09:53 PM
lol...tr00ling
Quote
04-19-2012 , 10:14 PM
Quote
06-17-2012 , 12:00 PM
Bump. YTD 2-1 +500, rmigley was right derivatives are ez money.

Quote
06-17-2012 , 09:30 PM
Any place to get historical 2.5 run lines?
Thanks
Quote
06-24-2012 , 06:54 PM
let's get that derivative money unluckyboy

YTD: 3-1 +1325


Quote
06-24-2012 , 07:17 PM
Tbh, I came looking for a recipe.
Quote
06-24-2012 , 07:27 PM
crushed yes score in 1st inning in that game and it lost what happened n00b24
Quote
06-24-2012 , 10:21 PM
Welcome to the wonderful world of Texas Rangers -2½
Quote
06-24-2012 , 10:38 PM
should joined the becky hammons 2H +340 system instead
Quote

      
m